Cargando…

Effects of supervised and unsupervised physical activity programmes for weight loss

OBJECTIVES: Physical activity is important for weight management. However, it remains unclear what type of physical activity prescription/programme is optimal for increasing physical activity during a standard behavioural weight loss intervention. This study examined changes in physical activity aft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Creasy, S. A., Rogers, R. J., Davis, K. K., Gibbs, B. B., Kershaw, E. E., Jakicic, J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5478811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28713583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.107
_version_ 1783245029651775488
author Creasy, S. A.
Rogers, R. J.
Davis, K. K.
Gibbs, B. B.
Kershaw, E. E.
Jakicic, J. M.
author_facet Creasy, S. A.
Rogers, R. J.
Davis, K. K.
Gibbs, B. B.
Kershaw, E. E.
Jakicic, J. M.
author_sort Creasy, S. A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Physical activity is important for weight management. However, it remains unclear what type of physical activity prescription/programme is optimal for increasing physical activity during a standard behavioural weight loss intervention. This study examined changes in physical activity after a 12‐week supervised programme prescribed in minutes per week (SUP‐PA), an unsupervised programme prescribed in minutes per week (UNSUP‐PA) and an unsupervised programme prescribed in steps per day (STEP). METHODS: Fifty‐two adults who were overweight or obese (age: 43.5 ± 10.1 years, BMI: 31.5 ± 3.5 kg·m(−2)) were randomized to STEP (n = 18), UNSUP‐PA (n = 17) and SUP‐PA (n = 17). Subjects attended weekly in‐person group intervention sessions and were prescribed a calorie‐restricted diet (1,200–1,800 kcals·day(−1)) combined with increased physical activity (150 min·week(−1) or 10,000 steps·day(−1) with 2,500 brisk steps·day(−1)). RESULTS: All three groups significantly increased moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (STEP: 80.6 ± 218.5 min·week(−1), UNSUP‐PA: 112.9 ± 180.4 min·week(−1) and SUP‐PA: 151.1 ± 174.0 min·week(−1), p < 0.001) with no differences between groups (p = 0.94) or group by time interaction (p = 0.81). In addition, there were no significant differences in weight loss between the groups (p = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: In this short‐term study, all three physical activity programmes increased physical activity and elicited modest weight loss when combined with a standard behavioural weight loss intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5478811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54788112017-07-13 Effects of supervised and unsupervised physical activity programmes for weight loss Creasy, S. A. Rogers, R. J. Davis, K. K. Gibbs, B. B. Kershaw, E. E. Jakicic, J. M. Obes Sci Pract Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Physical activity is important for weight management. However, it remains unclear what type of physical activity prescription/programme is optimal for increasing physical activity during a standard behavioural weight loss intervention. This study examined changes in physical activity after a 12‐week supervised programme prescribed in minutes per week (SUP‐PA), an unsupervised programme prescribed in minutes per week (UNSUP‐PA) and an unsupervised programme prescribed in steps per day (STEP). METHODS: Fifty‐two adults who were overweight or obese (age: 43.5 ± 10.1 years, BMI: 31.5 ± 3.5 kg·m(−2)) were randomized to STEP (n = 18), UNSUP‐PA (n = 17) and SUP‐PA (n = 17). Subjects attended weekly in‐person group intervention sessions and were prescribed a calorie‐restricted diet (1,200–1,800 kcals·day(−1)) combined with increased physical activity (150 min·week(−1) or 10,000 steps·day(−1) with 2,500 brisk steps·day(−1)). RESULTS: All three groups significantly increased moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (STEP: 80.6 ± 218.5 min·week(−1), UNSUP‐PA: 112.9 ± 180.4 min·week(−1) and SUP‐PA: 151.1 ± 174.0 min·week(−1), p < 0.001) with no differences between groups (p = 0.94) or group by time interaction (p = 0.81). In addition, there were no significant differences in weight loss between the groups (p = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: In this short‐term study, all three physical activity programmes increased physical activity and elicited modest weight loss when combined with a standard behavioural weight loss intervention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5478811/ /pubmed/28713583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.107 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, World Obesity and The Obesity Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Creasy, S. A.
Rogers, R. J.
Davis, K. K.
Gibbs, B. B.
Kershaw, E. E.
Jakicic, J. M.
Effects of supervised and unsupervised physical activity programmes for weight loss
title Effects of supervised and unsupervised physical activity programmes for weight loss
title_full Effects of supervised and unsupervised physical activity programmes for weight loss
title_fullStr Effects of supervised and unsupervised physical activity programmes for weight loss
title_full_unstemmed Effects of supervised and unsupervised physical activity programmes for weight loss
title_short Effects of supervised and unsupervised physical activity programmes for weight loss
title_sort effects of supervised and unsupervised physical activity programmes for weight loss
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5478811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28713583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.107
work_keys_str_mv AT creasysa effectsofsupervisedandunsupervisedphysicalactivityprogrammesforweightloss
AT rogersrj effectsofsupervisedandunsupervisedphysicalactivityprogrammesforweightloss
AT daviskk effectsofsupervisedandunsupervisedphysicalactivityprogrammesforweightloss
AT gibbsbb effectsofsupervisedandunsupervisedphysicalactivityprogrammesforweightloss
AT kershawee effectsofsupervisedandunsupervisedphysicalactivityprogrammesforweightloss
AT jakicicjm effectsofsupervisedandunsupervisedphysicalactivityprogrammesforweightloss