Cargando…

Does sperm quality and DNA integrity differ in cryopreserved semen samples from young, adult, and aged Nellore bulls?

BACKGROUND: In humans, it is now well documented that rising paternal age is correlated with decreased sperm DNA integrity and embryonic developmental failures. On the other side of the coin, it is also reported that very young fathers such as teenagers carry an increased risk of adverse birth outco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carreira, J. T., Trevizan, J. T., Carvalho, I. R., Kipper, B., Rodrigues, L. H., Silva, C., Perri, S. H. V., Drevet, J. R., Koivisto, M. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5479005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-017-0056-9
_version_ 1783245055008440320
author Carreira, J. T.
Trevizan, J. T.
Carvalho, I. R.
Kipper, B.
Rodrigues, L. H.
Silva, C.
Perri, S. H. V.
Drevet, J. R.
Koivisto, M. B.
author_facet Carreira, J. T.
Trevizan, J. T.
Carvalho, I. R.
Kipper, B.
Rodrigues, L. H.
Silva, C.
Perri, S. H. V.
Drevet, J. R.
Koivisto, M. B.
author_sort Carreira, J. T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In humans, it is now well documented that rising paternal age is correlated with decreased sperm DNA integrity and embryonic developmental failures. On the other side of the coin, it is also reported that very young fathers such as teenagers carry an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes. These observations suggest that, at least in humans, there is an age window for optimal sperm DNA integrity. In bovine, little is known about sperm DNA quality in young bulls and how it evolves with age. This study aimed to fill in this gap as it may be of importance for the bovine industry to know when exactly a bull is an optimal performer for reproductive programs. METHODS: Forty Nellore bulls were divided into three age groups: 1.8 to 2 years – young bulls; 3.5 to 7 years – adult bulls; and 8 to 14.3 years – aged bulls. Three ejaculates were collected from each bull, cryopreserved and evaluated for various parameters including: computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA), plasma membrane and acrosome integrity, mitochondrial potential, sperm nuclear protamination, DNA oxidative damage, and Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA). RESULTS: We report here that young bulls presented superior values for motility, plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, and high mitochondrial potential. However, they also presented higher values for sperm morphological abnormalities compared to adult and aged animal groups (p < 0.05). In addition, young bulls exhibited more defective protamination than older animals did. The oldest bulls showed more nuclear oxidative damage than the younger groups of bulls while both the young and aged groups were found more susceptible to DNA denaturation as revealed with the SCSA test (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that young bulls spermatozoa best survived the freezing procedure, followed by adult and aged bulls. However, young and aged bulls were found to be more susceptible to DNA damage, respectively caused by protamine deficiency and oxidation. Therefore, although young bulls have correct semen parameters according to classical evaluation, our results indicate that they may show some structural nuclear immaturity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5479005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54790052017-06-23 Does sperm quality and DNA integrity differ in cryopreserved semen samples from young, adult, and aged Nellore bulls? Carreira, J. T. Trevizan, J. T. Carvalho, I. R. Kipper, B. Rodrigues, L. H. Silva, C. Perri, S. H. V. Drevet, J. R. Koivisto, M. B. Basic Clin Androl Research Article BACKGROUND: In humans, it is now well documented that rising paternal age is correlated with decreased sperm DNA integrity and embryonic developmental failures. On the other side of the coin, it is also reported that very young fathers such as teenagers carry an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes. These observations suggest that, at least in humans, there is an age window for optimal sperm DNA integrity. In bovine, little is known about sperm DNA quality in young bulls and how it evolves with age. This study aimed to fill in this gap as it may be of importance for the bovine industry to know when exactly a bull is an optimal performer for reproductive programs. METHODS: Forty Nellore bulls were divided into three age groups: 1.8 to 2 years – young bulls; 3.5 to 7 years – adult bulls; and 8 to 14.3 years – aged bulls. Three ejaculates were collected from each bull, cryopreserved and evaluated for various parameters including: computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA), plasma membrane and acrosome integrity, mitochondrial potential, sperm nuclear protamination, DNA oxidative damage, and Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA). RESULTS: We report here that young bulls presented superior values for motility, plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, and high mitochondrial potential. However, they also presented higher values for sperm morphological abnormalities compared to adult and aged animal groups (p < 0.05). In addition, young bulls exhibited more defective protamination than older animals did. The oldest bulls showed more nuclear oxidative damage than the younger groups of bulls while both the young and aged groups were found more susceptible to DNA denaturation as revealed with the SCSA test (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that young bulls spermatozoa best survived the freezing procedure, followed by adult and aged bulls. However, young and aged bulls were found to be more susceptible to DNA damage, respectively caused by protamine deficiency and oxidation. Therefore, although young bulls have correct semen parameters according to classical evaluation, our results indicate that they may show some structural nuclear immaturity. BioMed Central 2017-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5479005/ /pubmed/28649382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-017-0056-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Carreira, J. T.
Trevizan, J. T.
Carvalho, I. R.
Kipper, B.
Rodrigues, L. H.
Silva, C.
Perri, S. H. V.
Drevet, J. R.
Koivisto, M. B.
Does sperm quality and DNA integrity differ in cryopreserved semen samples from young, adult, and aged Nellore bulls?
title Does sperm quality and DNA integrity differ in cryopreserved semen samples from young, adult, and aged Nellore bulls?
title_full Does sperm quality and DNA integrity differ in cryopreserved semen samples from young, adult, and aged Nellore bulls?
title_fullStr Does sperm quality and DNA integrity differ in cryopreserved semen samples from young, adult, and aged Nellore bulls?
title_full_unstemmed Does sperm quality and DNA integrity differ in cryopreserved semen samples from young, adult, and aged Nellore bulls?
title_short Does sperm quality and DNA integrity differ in cryopreserved semen samples from young, adult, and aged Nellore bulls?
title_sort does sperm quality and dna integrity differ in cryopreserved semen samples from young, adult, and aged nellore bulls?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5479005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-017-0056-9
work_keys_str_mv AT carreirajt doesspermqualityanddnaintegritydifferincryopreservedsemensamplesfromyoungadultandagednellorebulls
AT trevizanjt doesspermqualityanddnaintegritydifferincryopreservedsemensamplesfromyoungadultandagednellorebulls
AT carvalhoir doesspermqualityanddnaintegritydifferincryopreservedsemensamplesfromyoungadultandagednellorebulls
AT kipperb doesspermqualityanddnaintegritydifferincryopreservedsemensamplesfromyoungadultandagednellorebulls
AT rodrigueslh doesspermqualityanddnaintegritydifferincryopreservedsemensamplesfromyoungadultandagednellorebulls
AT silvac doesspermqualityanddnaintegritydifferincryopreservedsemensamplesfromyoungadultandagednellorebulls
AT perrishv doesspermqualityanddnaintegritydifferincryopreservedsemensamplesfromyoungadultandagednellorebulls
AT drevetjr doesspermqualityanddnaintegritydifferincryopreservedsemensamplesfromyoungadultandagednellorebulls
AT koivistomb doesspermqualityanddnaintegritydifferincryopreservedsemensamplesfromyoungadultandagednellorebulls