Cargando…
Current globalization of drug interventional clinical trials: characteristics and associated factors, 2011–2013
BACKGROUND: Clinical trial globalization is a major trend for industry-sponsored clinical trials. There has been a shift in clinical trial sites towards emerging regions of Eastern Europe, Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. Our study objectives were to evaluate the current characteris...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28637515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2025-1 |
_version_ | 1783245244214542336 |
---|---|
author | Jeong, Sohyun Sohn, Minji Kim, Jae Hyun Ko, Minoh Seo, Hee-won Song, Yun-Kyoung Choi, Boyoon Han, Nayoung Na, Han-Sung Lee, Jong Gu Kim, In-Wha Oh, Jung Mi Lee, Euni |
author_facet | Jeong, Sohyun Sohn, Minji Kim, Jae Hyun Ko, Minoh Seo, Hee-won Song, Yun-Kyoung Choi, Boyoon Han, Nayoung Na, Han-Sung Lee, Jong Gu Kim, In-Wha Oh, Jung Mi Lee, Euni |
author_sort | Jeong, Sohyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical trial globalization is a major trend for industry-sponsored clinical trials. There has been a shift in clinical trial sites towards emerging regions of Eastern Europe, Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. Our study objectives were to evaluate the current characteristics of clinical trials and to find out the associated multiple factors which could explain clinical trial globalization and its implications for clinical trial globalization in 2011–2013. METHODS: The data elements of “phase,” “recruitment status,” “type of sponsor,” “age groups,” and “design of trial” from 30 countries were extracted from the ClinicalTrials.gov website. Ten continental representative countries including the USA were selected and the design elements were compared to those of the USA. Factors associated with trial site distribution were chosen for a multilinear regression analysis. RESULTS: The USA, Germany, France, Canada, and United Kingdom were the “top five” countries which frequently held clinical trials. The design elements from nine continental representative countries were quite different from those of the USA; phase 1 trials were more prevalent in India (OR 1.517, p < 0.001) while phase 3 trials were much more prevalent in all nine representative countries than in the USA. A larger number of “child” age group trials was performed in Poland (OR 1.852, p < 0.001), Israel (OR 1.546, p = 0.005), and South Africa (OR 1.963, p < 0.001) than in the USA. Multivariate analysis showed that health care expenditure per capita, Economic Freedom Index, Human Capital Index, and Intellectual Property Rights Index could explain the variance of regional distribution of clinical trials by 63.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The globalization of clinical trials in the emerging regions of Asia, South Africa, and Eastern Europe developed in parallel with the factors of economic drive, population for recruitment, and regulatory constraints. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2025-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5480138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54801382017-06-23 Current globalization of drug interventional clinical trials: characteristics and associated factors, 2011–2013 Jeong, Sohyun Sohn, Minji Kim, Jae Hyun Ko, Minoh Seo, Hee-won Song, Yun-Kyoung Choi, Boyoon Han, Nayoung Na, Han-Sung Lee, Jong Gu Kim, In-Wha Oh, Jung Mi Lee, Euni Trials Research BACKGROUND: Clinical trial globalization is a major trend for industry-sponsored clinical trials. There has been a shift in clinical trial sites towards emerging regions of Eastern Europe, Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. Our study objectives were to evaluate the current characteristics of clinical trials and to find out the associated multiple factors which could explain clinical trial globalization and its implications for clinical trial globalization in 2011–2013. METHODS: The data elements of “phase,” “recruitment status,” “type of sponsor,” “age groups,” and “design of trial” from 30 countries were extracted from the ClinicalTrials.gov website. Ten continental representative countries including the USA were selected and the design elements were compared to those of the USA. Factors associated with trial site distribution were chosen for a multilinear regression analysis. RESULTS: The USA, Germany, France, Canada, and United Kingdom were the “top five” countries which frequently held clinical trials. The design elements from nine continental representative countries were quite different from those of the USA; phase 1 trials were more prevalent in India (OR 1.517, p < 0.001) while phase 3 trials were much more prevalent in all nine representative countries than in the USA. A larger number of “child” age group trials was performed in Poland (OR 1.852, p < 0.001), Israel (OR 1.546, p = 0.005), and South Africa (OR 1.963, p < 0.001) than in the USA. Multivariate analysis showed that health care expenditure per capita, Economic Freedom Index, Human Capital Index, and Intellectual Property Rights Index could explain the variance of regional distribution of clinical trials by 63.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The globalization of clinical trials in the emerging regions of Asia, South Africa, and Eastern Europe developed in parallel with the factors of economic drive, population for recruitment, and regulatory constraints. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2025-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5480138/ /pubmed/28637515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2025-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Jeong, Sohyun Sohn, Minji Kim, Jae Hyun Ko, Minoh Seo, Hee-won Song, Yun-Kyoung Choi, Boyoon Han, Nayoung Na, Han-Sung Lee, Jong Gu Kim, In-Wha Oh, Jung Mi Lee, Euni Current globalization of drug interventional clinical trials: characteristics and associated factors, 2011–2013 |
title | Current globalization of drug interventional clinical trials: characteristics and associated factors, 2011–2013 |
title_full | Current globalization of drug interventional clinical trials: characteristics and associated factors, 2011–2013 |
title_fullStr | Current globalization of drug interventional clinical trials: characteristics and associated factors, 2011–2013 |
title_full_unstemmed | Current globalization of drug interventional clinical trials: characteristics and associated factors, 2011–2013 |
title_short | Current globalization of drug interventional clinical trials: characteristics and associated factors, 2011–2013 |
title_sort | current globalization of drug interventional clinical trials: characteristics and associated factors, 2011–2013 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28637515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2025-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeongsohyun currentglobalizationofdruginterventionalclinicaltrialscharacteristicsandassociatedfactors20112013 AT sohnminji currentglobalizationofdruginterventionalclinicaltrialscharacteristicsandassociatedfactors20112013 AT kimjaehyun currentglobalizationofdruginterventionalclinicaltrialscharacteristicsandassociatedfactors20112013 AT kominoh currentglobalizationofdruginterventionalclinicaltrialscharacteristicsandassociatedfactors20112013 AT seoheewon currentglobalizationofdruginterventionalclinicaltrialscharacteristicsandassociatedfactors20112013 AT songyunkyoung currentglobalizationofdruginterventionalclinicaltrialscharacteristicsandassociatedfactors20112013 AT choiboyoon currentglobalizationofdruginterventionalclinicaltrialscharacteristicsandassociatedfactors20112013 AT hannayoung currentglobalizationofdruginterventionalclinicaltrialscharacteristicsandassociatedfactors20112013 AT nahansung currentglobalizationofdruginterventionalclinicaltrialscharacteristicsandassociatedfactors20112013 AT leejonggu currentglobalizationofdruginterventionalclinicaltrialscharacteristicsandassociatedfactors20112013 AT kiminwha currentglobalizationofdruginterventionalclinicaltrialscharacteristicsandassociatedfactors20112013 AT ohjungmi currentglobalizationofdruginterventionalclinicaltrialscharacteristicsandassociatedfactors20112013 AT leeeuni currentglobalizationofdruginterventionalclinicaltrialscharacteristicsandassociatedfactors20112013 |