Cargando…

A prospective single centre pilot evaluation of a serum calprotectin assay in unselected GI patients

BACKGROUND: Whilst C-reactive protein (CRP) is an established serum marker of inflammation, its use in gastroenterology has been limited by its poor sensitivity and specificity for GI disease. Faecal calprotectin (FC) has been adopted into mainstream GI practice as a sensitive but non-specific marke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCann, Rebecca K, Smith, Karen, Gaya, Daniel R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28093196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.01.006
_version_ 1783245292204720128
author McCann, Rebecca K
Smith, Karen
Gaya, Daniel R
author_facet McCann, Rebecca K
Smith, Karen
Gaya, Daniel R
author_sort McCann, Rebecca K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whilst C-reactive protein (CRP) is an established serum marker of inflammation, its use in gastroenterology has been limited by its poor sensitivity and specificity for GI disease. Faecal calprotectin (FC) has been adopted into mainstream GI practice as a sensitive but non-specific marker of intestinal inflammation. However, stool samples collection for FC can be challenging and the possibility of utilising a sensitive and specific serum biomarker of intestinal inflammation in luminal gastroenterology is an attractive prospect. This work investigates the performance of serum calprotectin (SC) compared to current biomarkers, FC and CRP, in an unselected cohort of patients attending our GI unit. METHODS: Patients attending in and outpatients within an adult GI service who submitted a stool sample for FC analysis were identified. A total of 109 who had a serum sample obtained within one day of stool sample collection had the serum analysed for CRP and SC and the correlation between these biomarkers was investigated. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between SC, FC and CRP was 0.10, 95% CI − 0.09–0.28 and 0.18, 95% CI − 0.01–0.35, respectively. The ICC between FC and CRP was 0.18, 95% CI − 0.01–0.35. CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveals that there is no significant correlation between SC and FC, nor between SC and CRP in a large unselected cohort of GI patients. Therefore, as a serum biomarker for intestinal inflammation, SC is unlikely to be of clinical utility and the search for an appropriate serum GI biomarker continues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5480541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54805412017-06-29 A prospective single centre pilot evaluation of a serum calprotectin assay in unselected GI patients McCann, Rebecca K Smith, Karen Gaya, Daniel R Clin Biochem Short Communication BACKGROUND: Whilst C-reactive protein (CRP) is an established serum marker of inflammation, its use in gastroenterology has been limited by its poor sensitivity and specificity for GI disease. Faecal calprotectin (FC) has been adopted into mainstream GI practice as a sensitive but non-specific marker of intestinal inflammation. However, stool samples collection for FC can be challenging and the possibility of utilising a sensitive and specific serum biomarker of intestinal inflammation in luminal gastroenterology is an attractive prospect. This work investigates the performance of serum calprotectin (SC) compared to current biomarkers, FC and CRP, in an unselected cohort of patients attending our GI unit. METHODS: Patients attending in and outpatients within an adult GI service who submitted a stool sample for FC analysis were identified. A total of 109 who had a serum sample obtained within one day of stool sample collection had the serum analysed for CRP and SC and the correlation between these biomarkers was investigated. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between SC, FC and CRP was 0.10, 95% CI − 0.09–0.28 and 0.18, 95% CI − 0.01–0.35, respectively. The ICC between FC and CRP was 0.18, 95% CI − 0.01–0.35. CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveals that there is no significant correlation between SC and FC, nor between SC and CRP in a large unselected cohort of GI patients. Therefore, as a serum biomarker for intestinal inflammation, SC is unlikely to be of clinical utility and the search for an appropriate serum GI biomarker continues. Elsevier Science 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5480541/ /pubmed/28093196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.01.006 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Communication
McCann, Rebecca K
Smith, Karen
Gaya, Daniel R
A prospective single centre pilot evaluation of a serum calprotectin assay in unselected GI patients
title A prospective single centre pilot evaluation of a serum calprotectin assay in unselected GI patients
title_full A prospective single centre pilot evaluation of a serum calprotectin assay in unselected GI patients
title_fullStr A prospective single centre pilot evaluation of a serum calprotectin assay in unselected GI patients
title_full_unstemmed A prospective single centre pilot evaluation of a serum calprotectin assay in unselected GI patients
title_short A prospective single centre pilot evaluation of a serum calprotectin assay in unselected GI patients
title_sort prospective single centre pilot evaluation of a serum calprotectin assay in unselected gi patients
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28093196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.01.006
work_keys_str_mv AT mccannrebeccak aprospectivesinglecentrepilotevaluationofaserumcalprotectinassayinunselectedgipatients
AT smithkaren aprospectivesinglecentrepilotevaluationofaserumcalprotectinassayinunselectedgipatients
AT gayadanielr aprospectivesinglecentrepilotevaluationofaserumcalprotectinassayinunselectedgipatients
AT mccannrebeccak prospectivesinglecentrepilotevaluationofaserumcalprotectinassayinunselectedgipatients
AT smithkaren prospectivesinglecentrepilotevaluationofaserumcalprotectinassayinunselectedgipatients
AT gayadanielr prospectivesinglecentrepilotevaluationofaserumcalprotectinassayinunselectedgipatients