Cargando…
Pavlovian influences on learning differ between rats and mice in a counter-balanced Go/NoGo judgement bias task
Judgement bias tests of animal affect and hence welfare assume that the animal’s responses to ambiguous stimuli, which may herald positive or negative outcomes, are under instrumental control and reflect ‘optimism’ or ‘pessimism’ about what will happen. However, Pavlovian control favours responses (...
Autores principales: | Jones, Samantha, Paul, Elizabeth S., Dayan, Peter, Robinson, Emma S.J., Mendl, Michael |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28549647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.05.044 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessing animal affect: an automated and self-initiated judgement bias task based on natural investigative behaviour
por: Jones, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Author Correction: Assessing animal affect: an automated and self-initiated judgement bias task based on natural investigative behaviour
por: Jones, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Sex differences in learning and performing the Go/NoGo tasks
por: Zhang, Qianwen, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task
por: Hintze, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Reward and punisher experience alter rodent decision-making in a judgement bias task
por: Neville, Vikki, et al.
Publicado: (2020)