Cargando…

Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Remote parenchymal haemorrhage (rPH) after intravenous thrombolysis is defined as hemorrhages that appear in brain regions without visible ischemic damage, remote from the area of ischemia causing the initial stroke symptom. The pathophysiology of rPH is not clear and may be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prats-Sanchez, Luis, Martínez-Domeño, Alejandro, Camps-Renom, Pol, Delgado-Mederos, Raquel, Guisado-Alonso, Daniel, Marín, Rebeca, Dorado, Laura, Rudilosso, Salvatore, Gómez-González, Alejandra, Purroy, Francisco, Gómez-Choco, Manuel, Cánovas, David, Cocho, Dolores, Garces, Moises, Abilleira, Sonia, Martí-Fàbregas, Joan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178284
_version_ 1783245311600230400
author Prats-Sanchez, Luis
Martínez-Domeño, Alejandro
Camps-Renom, Pol
Delgado-Mederos, Raquel
Guisado-Alonso, Daniel
Marín, Rebeca
Dorado, Laura
Rudilosso, Salvatore
Gómez-González, Alejandra
Purroy, Francisco
Gómez-Choco, Manuel
Cánovas, David
Cocho, Dolores
Garces, Moises
Abilleira, Sonia
Martí-Fàbregas, Joan
author_facet Prats-Sanchez, Luis
Martínez-Domeño, Alejandro
Camps-Renom, Pol
Delgado-Mederos, Raquel
Guisado-Alonso, Daniel
Marín, Rebeca
Dorado, Laura
Rudilosso, Salvatore
Gómez-González, Alejandra
Purroy, Francisco
Gómez-Choco, Manuel
Cánovas, David
Cocho, Dolores
Garces, Moises
Abilleira, Sonia
Martí-Fàbregas, Joan
author_sort Prats-Sanchez, Luis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Remote parenchymal haemorrhage (rPH) after intravenous thrombolysis is defined as hemorrhages that appear in brain regions without visible ischemic damage, remote from the area of ischemia causing the initial stroke symptom. The pathophysiology of rPH is not clear and may be explained by different underlying mechanisms. We hypothesized that rPH may have different risk factors according to the bleeding location. We report the variables that we found associated with deep and lobar rPH after intravenous thrombolysis. METHODS: This is a descriptive study of patients with ischemic stroke who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. These patients were included in a multicenter prospective registry. We collected demographic, clinical and radiological data. We evaluated the number and distribution of cerebral microbleeds (CMB) from Magnetic Resonance Imaging. We excluded patients treated endovascularly, patients with parenchymal hemorrhage without concomitant rPH and stroke mimics. We compared the variables from patients with deep or lobar rPH with those with no intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: We studied 934 patients (mean age 73.9±12.6 years) and 52.8% were men. We observed rPH in 34 patients (3.6%); 9 (0.9%) were deep and 25 (2.7%) lobar. No hemorrhage was observed in 900 (96.6%) patients. Deep rPH were associated with hypertensive episodes within first 24 hours after intravenous thrombolysis (77.7% vs 23.3%, p<0.001). Lobar rPH were associated with the presence of CMB (53.8% vs 7.9%, p<0.001), multiple (>1) CMB (30.7% vs 4.4%, p = 0.003), lobar CMB (53.8% vs 3.0%, p<0.001) and severe leukoaraiosis (76.9% vs 42%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: A high blood pressure within the first 24 hours after intravenous thrombolysis is associated with deep rPH, whereas lobar rPH are associated with imaging markers of amyloid deposition. Thus, our results suggest that deep and lobar rPH after intravenous thrombolysis may have different mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5480833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54808332017-07-05 Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis Prats-Sanchez, Luis Martínez-Domeño, Alejandro Camps-Renom, Pol Delgado-Mederos, Raquel Guisado-Alonso, Daniel Marín, Rebeca Dorado, Laura Rudilosso, Salvatore Gómez-González, Alejandra Purroy, Francisco Gómez-Choco, Manuel Cánovas, David Cocho, Dolores Garces, Moises Abilleira, Sonia Martí-Fàbregas, Joan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Remote parenchymal haemorrhage (rPH) after intravenous thrombolysis is defined as hemorrhages that appear in brain regions without visible ischemic damage, remote from the area of ischemia causing the initial stroke symptom. The pathophysiology of rPH is not clear and may be explained by different underlying mechanisms. We hypothesized that rPH may have different risk factors according to the bleeding location. We report the variables that we found associated with deep and lobar rPH after intravenous thrombolysis. METHODS: This is a descriptive study of patients with ischemic stroke who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. These patients were included in a multicenter prospective registry. We collected demographic, clinical and radiological data. We evaluated the number and distribution of cerebral microbleeds (CMB) from Magnetic Resonance Imaging. We excluded patients treated endovascularly, patients with parenchymal hemorrhage without concomitant rPH and stroke mimics. We compared the variables from patients with deep or lobar rPH with those with no intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: We studied 934 patients (mean age 73.9±12.6 years) and 52.8% were men. We observed rPH in 34 patients (3.6%); 9 (0.9%) were deep and 25 (2.7%) lobar. No hemorrhage was observed in 900 (96.6%) patients. Deep rPH were associated with hypertensive episodes within first 24 hours after intravenous thrombolysis (77.7% vs 23.3%, p<0.001). Lobar rPH were associated with the presence of CMB (53.8% vs 7.9%, p<0.001), multiple (>1) CMB (30.7% vs 4.4%, p = 0.003), lobar CMB (53.8% vs 3.0%, p<0.001) and severe leukoaraiosis (76.9% vs 42%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: A high blood pressure within the first 24 hours after intravenous thrombolysis is associated with deep rPH, whereas lobar rPH are associated with imaging markers of amyloid deposition. Thus, our results suggest that deep and lobar rPH after intravenous thrombolysis may have different mechanisms. Public Library of Science 2017-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5480833/ /pubmed/28640874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178284 Text en © 2017 Prats-Sanchez et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Prats-Sanchez, Luis
Martínez-Domeño, Alejandro
Camps-Renom, Pol
Delgado-Mederos, Raquel
Guisado-Alonso, Daniel
Marín, Rebeca
Dorado, Laura
Rudilosso, Salvatore
Gómez-González, Alejandra
Purroy, Francisco
Gómez-Choco, Manuel
Cánovas, David
Cocho, Dolores
Garces, Moises
Abilleira, Sonia
Martí-Fàbregas, Joan
Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis
title Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis
title_full Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis
title_fullStr Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis
title_short Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis
title_sort risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178284
work_keys_str_mv AT pratssanchezluis riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT martinezdomenoalejandro riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT campsrenompol riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT delgadomederosraquel riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT guisadoalonsodaniel riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT marinrebeca riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT doradolaura riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT rudilossosalvatore riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT gomezgonzalezalejandra riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT purroyfrancisco riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT gomezchocomanuel riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT canovasdavid riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT cochodolores riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT garcesmoises riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT abilleirasonia riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis
AT martifabregasjoan riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis