Cargando…
Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Remote parenchymal haemorrhage (rPH) after intravenous thrombolysis is defined as hemorrhages that appear in brain regions without visible ischemic damage, remote from the area of ischemia causing the initial stroke symptom. The pathophysiology of rPH is not clear and may be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178284 |
_version_ | 1783245311600230400 |
---|---|
author | Prats-Sanchez, Luis Martínez-Domeño, Alejandro Camps-Renom, Pol Delgado-Mederos, Raquel Guisado-Alonso, Daniel Marín, Rebeca Dorado, Laura Rudilosso, Salvatore Gómez-González, Alejandra Purroy, Francisco Gómez-Choco, Manuel Cánovas, David Cocho, Dolores Garces, Moises Abilleira, Sonia Martí-Fàbregas, Joan |
author_facet | Prats-Sanchez, Luis Martínez-Domeño, Alejandro Camps-Renom, Pol Delgado-Mederos, Raquel Guisado-Alonso, Daniel Marín, Rebeca Dorado, Laura Rudilosso, Salvatore Gómez-González, Alejandra Purroy, Francisco Gómez-Choco, Manuel Cánovas, David Cocho, Dolores Garces, Moises Abilleira, Sonia Martí-Fàbregas, Joan |
author_sort | Prats-Sanchez, Luis |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Remote parenchymal haemorrhage (rPH) after intravenous thrombolysis is defined as hemorrhages that appear in brain regions without visible ischemic damage, remote from the area of ischemia causing the initial stroke symptom. The pathophysiology of rPH is not clear and may be explained by different underlying mechanisms. We hypothesized that rPH may have different risk factors according to the bleeding location. We report the variables that we found associated with deep and lobar rPH after intravenous thrombolysis. METHODS: This is a descriptive study of patients with ischemic stroke who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. These patients were included in a multicenter prospective registry. We collected demographic, clinical and radiological data. We evaluated the number and distribution of cerebral microbleeds (CMB) from Magnetic Resonance Imaging. We excluded patients treated endovascularly, patients with parenchymal hemorrhage without concomitant rPH and stroke mimics. We compared the variables from patients with deep or lobar rPH with those with no intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: We studied 934 patients (mean age 73.9±12.6 years) and 52.8% were men. We observed rPH in 34 patients (3.6%); 9 (0.9%) were deep and 25 (2.7%) lobar. No hemorrhage was observed in 900 (96.6%) patients. Deep rPH were associated with hypertensive episodes within first 24 hours after intravenous thrombolysis (77.7% vs 23.3%, p<0.001). Lobar rPH were associated with the presence of CMB (53.8% vs 7.9%, p<0.001), multiple (>1) CMB (30.7% vs 4.4%, p = 0.003), lobar CMB (53.8% vs 3.0%, p<0.001) and severe leukoaraiosis (76.9% vs 42%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: A high blood pressure within the first 24 hours after intravenous thrombolysis is associated with deep rPH, whereas lobar rPH are associated with imaging markers of amyloid deposition. Thus, our results suggest that deep and lobar rPH after intravenous thrombolysis may have different mechanisms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5480833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54808332017-07-05 Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis Prats-Sanchez, Luis Martínez-Domeño, Alejandro Camps-Renom, Pol Delgado-Mederos, Raquel Guisado-Alonso, Daniel Marín, Rebeca Dorado, Laura Rudilosso, Salvatore Gómez-González, Alejandra Purroy, Francisco Gómez-Choco, Manuel Cánovas, David Cocho, Dolores Garces, Moises Abilleira, Sonia Martí-Fàbregas, Joan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Remote parenchymal haemorrhage (rPH) after intravenous thrombolysis is defined as hemorrhages that appear in brain regions without visible ischemic damage, remote from the area of ischemia causing the initial stroke symptom. The pathophysiology of rPH is not clear and may be explained by different underlying mechanisms. We hypothesized that rPH may have different risk factors according to the bleeding location. We report the variables that we found associated with deep and lobar rPH after intravenous thrombolysis. METHODS: This is a descriptive study of patients with ischemic stroke who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. These patients were included in a multicenter prospective registry. We collected demographic, clinical and radiological data. We evaluated the number and distribution of cerebral microbleeds (CMB) from Magnetic Resonance Imaging. We excluded patients treated endovascularly, patients with parenchymal hemorrhage without concomitant rPH and stroke mimics. We compared the variables from patients with deep or lobar rPH with those with no intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: We studied 934 patients (mean age 73.9±12.6 years) and 52.8% were men. We observed rPH in 34 patients (3.6%); 9 (0.9%) were deep and 25 (2.7%) lobar. No hemorrhage was observed in 900 (96.6%) patients. Deep rPH were associated with hypertensive episodes within first 24 hours after intravenous thrombolysis (77.7% vs 23.3%, p<0.001). Lobar rPH were associated with the presence of CMB (53.8% vs 7.9%, p<0.001), multiple (>1) CMB (30.7% vs 4.4%, p = 0.003), lobar CMB (53.8% vs 3.0%, p<0.001) and severe leukoaraiosis (76.9% vs 42%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: A high blood pressure within the first 24 hours after intravenous thrombolysis is associated with deep rPH, whereas lobar rPH are associated with imaging markers of amyloid deposition. Thus, our results suggest that deep and lobar rPH after intravenous thrombolysis may have different mechanisms. Public Library of Science 2017-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5480833/ /pubmed/28640874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178284 Text en © 2017 Prats-Sanchez et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Prats-Sanchez, Luis Martínez-Domeño, Alejandro Camps-Renom, Pol Delgado-Mederos, Raquel Guisado-Alonso, Daniel Marín, Rebeca Dorado, Laura Rudilosso, Salvatore Gómez-González, Alejandra Purroy, Francisco Gómez-Choco, Manuel Cánovas, David Cocho, Dolores Garces, Moises Abilleira, Sonia Martí-Fàbregas, Joan Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis |
title | Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis |
title_full | Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis |
title_fullStr | Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis |
title_short | Risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis |
title_sort | risk factors are different for deep and lobar remote hemorrhages after intravenous thrombolysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pratssanchezluis riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT martinezdomenoalejandro riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT campsrenompol riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT delgadomederosraquel riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT guisadoalonsodaniel riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT marinrebeca riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT doradolaura riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT rudilossosalvatore riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT gomezgonzalezalejandra riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT purroyfrancisco riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT gomezchocomanuel riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT canovasdavid riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT cochodolores riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT garcesmoises riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT abilleirasonia riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis AT martifabregasjoan riskfactorsaredifferentfordeepandlobarremotehemorrhagesafterintravenousthrombolysis |