Cargando…

Systematic review and meta-analysis of initial management of pneumothorax in adults: Intercostal tube drainage versus other invasive methods

OBJECTIVES: The ideal invasive management as initial approach for pneumothorax (PTX) is still under debate. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the evidence for the effectiveness of intercostal tube drainage and other various invasive methods as the initial approac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Min Joung, Park, Incheol, Park, Joon Min, Kim, Kyung Hwan, Park, Junseok, Shin, Dong Wun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178802
_version_ 1783245314547777536
author Kim, Min Joung
Park, Incheol
Park, Joon Min
Kim, Kyung Hwan
Park, Junseok
Shin, Dong Wun
author_facet Kim, Min Joung
Park, Incheol
Park, Joon Min
Kim, Kyung Hwan
Park, Junseok
Shin, Dong Wun
author_sort Kim, Min Joung
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The ideal invasive management as initial approach for pneumothorax (PTX) is still under debate. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the evidence for the effectiveness of intercostal tube drainage and other various invasive methods as the initial approach to all subtypes of PTX in adults. METHODS: Three databases were searched from inception to May 29, 2016: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL. Randomised controlled trials that evaluated intercostal tube drainage as the control and various invasive methods as the intervention for the initial approach to PTX in adults were included. The primary outcome was the early success rate of each method, and the risk ratios (RRs) were used for an effect size measure. The secondary outcomes were recurrence rate, hospitalization rate, hospital stay, and complications. RESULTS: Seven studies met our inclusion criteria. Interventions were aspiration in six studies and catheterization connected to a one-way valve in one study. Meta-analyses were conducted for early success rate, recurrence rate, hospitalization rate, and hospital stay. Aspiration was inferior to intercostal tube drainage in terms of early success rate (RR = 0.82, confidence interval [CI] = 0.72 to 0.95, I(2) = 0%). While aspiration and intercostal tube drainage showed no significant difference in the recurrence rate (RR = 0.84, CI = 0.57 to 1.23, I(2) = 0%), aspiration had shorter hospital stay than intercostal tube drainage (mean difference = -1.73, CI = -2.33 to -1.13, I(2) = 0%). Aspiration had lower hospitalization rate than intercostal tube drainage, but marked heterogeneity was present (RR = 0.38, CI = 0.19 to 0.76, I(2) = 85%). CONCLUSION: Aspiration was inferior to intercostal tube drainage in terms of early resolution, but it had shorter hospital stay. The recurrence rate of aspiration and intercostal tube drainage did not differ significantly. The efficacy of catheterization connected to a one-way valve was inconclusive because of the small number of relevant studies. (Registration of study protocol: PROSPERO, CRD42016037866)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5480863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54808632017-07-05 Systematic review and meta-analysis of initial management of pneumothorax in adults: Intercostal tube drainage versus other invasive methods Kim, Min Joung Park, Incheol Park, Joon Min Kim, Kyung Hwan Park, Junseok Shin, Dong Wun PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The ideal invasive management as initial approach for pneumothorax (PTX) is still under debate. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the evidence for the effectiveness of intercostal tube drainage and other various invasive methods as the initial approach to all subtypes of PTX in adults. METHODS: Three databases were searched from inception to May 29, 2016: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL. Randomised controlled trials that evaluated intercostal tube drainage as the control and various invasive methods as the intervention for the initial approach to PTX in adults were included. The primary outcome was the early success rate of each method, and the risk ratios (RRs) were used for an effect size measure. The secondary outcomes were recurrence rate, hospitalization rate, hospital stay, and complications. RESULTS: Seven studies met our inclusion criteria. Interventions were aspiration in six studies and catheterization connected to a one-way valve in one study. Meta-analyses were conducted for early success rate, recurrence rate, hospitalization rate, and hospital stay. Aspiration was inferior to intercostal tube drainage in terms of early success rate (RR = 0.82, confidence interval [CI] = 0.72 to 0.95, I(2) = 0%). While aspiration and intercostal tube drainage showed no significant difference in the recurrence rate (RR = 0.84, CI = 0.57 to 1.23, I(2) = 0%), aspiration had shorter hospital stay than intercostal tube drainage (mean difference = -1.73, CI = -2.33 to -1.13, I(2) = 0%). Aspiration had lower hospitalization rate than intercostal tube drainage, but marked heterogeneity was present (RR = 0.38, CI = 0.19 to 0.76, I(2) = 85%). CONCLUSION: Aspiration was inferior to intercostal tube drainage in terms of early resolution, but it had shorter hospital stay. The recurrence rate of aspiration and intercostal tube drainage did not differ significantly. The efficacy of catheterization connected to a one-way valve was inconclusive because of the small number of relevant studies. (Registration of study protocol: PROSPERO, CRD42016037866) Public Library of Science 2017-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5480863/ /pubmed/28640890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178802 Text en © 2017 Kim et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Min Joung
Park, Incheol
Park, Joon Min
Kim, Kyung Hwan
Park, Junseok
Shin, Dong Wun
Systematic review and meta-analysis of initial management of pneumothorax in adults: Intercostal tube drainage versus other invasive methods
title Systematic review and meta-analysis of initial management of pneumothorax in adults: Intercostal tube drainage versus other invasive methods
title_full Systematic review and meta-analysis of initial management of pneumothorax in adults: Intercostal tube drainage versus other invasive methods
title_fullStr Systematic review and meta-analysis of initial management of pneumothorax in adults: Intercostal tube drainage versus other invasive methods
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and meta-analysis of initial management of pneumothorax in adults: Intercostal tube drainage versus other invasive methods
title_short Systematic review and meta-analysis of initial management of pneumothorax in adults: Intercostal tube drainage versus other invasive methods
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of initial management of pneumothorax in adults: intercostal tube drainage versus other invasive methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178802
work_keys_str_mv AT kimminjoung systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinitialmanagementofpneumothoraxinadultsintercostaltubedrainageversusotherinvasivemethods
AT parkincheol systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinitialmanagementofpneumothoraxinadultsintercostaltubedrainageversusotherinvasivemethods
AT parkjoonmin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinitialmanagementofpneumothoraxinadultsintercostaltubedrainageversusotherinvasivemethods
AT kimkyunghwan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinitialmanagementofpneumothoraxinadultsintercostaltubedrainageversusotherinvasivemethods
AT parkjunseok systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinitialmanagementofpneumothoraxinadultsintercostaltubedrainageversusotherinvasivemethods
AT shindongwun systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofinitialmanagementofpneumothoraxinadultsintercostaltubedrainageversusotherinvasivemethods