Cargando…

Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility of self-assessment of medical abortion outcome using a low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test, checklist and text messages. The study assessed whether accurate self-assessment required a demonstration of the low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test or if verbal instructi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Constant, Deborah, Harries, Jane, Daskilewicz, Kristen, Myer, Landon, Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179600
_version_ 1783245320476426240
author Constant, Deborah
Harries, Jane
Daskilewicz, Kristen
Myer, Landon
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
author_facet Constant, Deborah
Harries, Jane
Daskilewicz, Kristen
Myer, Landon
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
author_sort Constant, Deborah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility of self-assessment of medical abortion outcome using a low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test, checklist and text messages. The study assessed whether accurate self-assessment required a demonstration of the low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test or if verbal instructions suffice. METHODS: This non-inferiority trial enrolled 525 adult women from six public sector abortion clinics. Eligible women were undergoing medical abortion at gestations within 63 days. Consenting women completed a baseline interview, received standard care with mifepristone and home-administration of misoprostol. All were given a low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test and checklist for use 14 days later, sent text reminders, and asked to attend in-clinic follow-up after two weeks. Women were randomly assigned 1:1 to an instruction-only group (n = 262; issued with pre-scripted instructions on the low-sensitivity pregnancy test), or a demonstration group (n = 263; performed practice tests guided by lay health workers). The primary outcome was accurate self-assessment of incomplete abortion, defined as needing additional misoprostol or vacuum aspiration. Analysis was by intention to treat and a non-inferiority margin was set to six percentage points. Women’s acceptability of their abortion procedure and preferences for follow-up were also assessed. RESULTS: Follow-up was 81% for abortion outcome, confirmed in-clinic at two weeks or self-reported within six months. Non-inferiority of instruction-only to a demonstration was inconclusive for accurate self-assessment (risk difference for instruction-only –demonstration: -2.5%; 95%CI: -9% to 4%). Comparing instruction-only to demonstration groups, 99% and 100% found the pregnancy test easy to do; and 91% and 93% respectively chose the pregnancy test, checklist and text messages for abortion outcome assessment in the future. CONCLUSION: Routine self-assessment using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test, checklist and text messages is feasible and preferred by women attending South African primary care abortion clinics. Counselling with additional emphasis on prompt recognition of ongoing pregnancies is recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02231619
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5480887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54808872017-07-05 Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial Constant, Deborah Harries, Jane Daskilewicz, Kristen Myer, Landon Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility of self-assessment of medical abortion outcome using a low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test, checklist and text messages. The study assessed whether accurate self-assessment required a demonstration of the low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test or if verbal instructions suffice. METHODS: This non-inferiority trial enrolled 525 adult women from six public sector abortion clinics. Eligible women were undergoing medical abortion at gestations within 63 days. Consenting women completed a baseline interview, received standard care with mifepristone and home-administration of misoprostol. All were given a low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test and checklist for use 14 days later, sent text reminders, and asked to attend in-clinic follow-up after two weeks. Women were randomly assigned 1:1 to an instruction-only group (n = 262; issued with pre-scripted instructions on the low-sensitivity pregnancy test), or a demonstration group (n = 263; performed practice tests guided by lay health workers). The primary outcome was accurate self-assessment of incomplete abortion, defined as needing additional misoprostol or vacuum aspiration. Analysis was by intention to treat and a non-inferiority margin was set to six percentage points. Women’s acceptability of their abortion procedure and preferences for follow-up were also assessed. RESULTS: Follow-up was 81% for abortion outcome, confirmed in-clinic at two weeks or self-reported within six months. Non-inferiority of instruction-only to a demonstration was inconclusive for accurate self-assessment (risk difference for instruction-only –demonstration: -2.5%; 95%CI: -9% to 4%). Comparing instruction-only to demonstration groups, 99% and 100% found the pregnancy test easy to do; and 91% and 93% respectively chose the pregnancy test, checklist and text messages for abortion outcome assessment in the future. CONCLUSION: Routine self-assessment using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test, checklist and text messages is feasible and preferred by women attending South African primary care abortion clinics. Counselling with additional emphasis on prompt recognition of ongoing pregnancies is recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02231619 Public Library of Science 2017-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5480887/ /pubmed/28640845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179600 Text en © 2017 Constant et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Constant, Deborah
Harries, Jane
Daskilewicz, Kristen
Myer, Landon
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial
title Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial
title_full Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial
title_fullStr Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial
title_short Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial
title_sort is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in south african primary healthcare settings? a randomized trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179600
work_keys_str_mv AT constantdeborah isselfassessmentofmedicalabortionusingalowsensitivitypregnancytestcombinedwithachecklistandphonetextmessagesfeasibleinsouthafricanprimaryhealthcaresettingsarandomizedtrial
AT harriesjane isselfassessmentofmedicalabortionusingalowsensitivitypregnancytestcombinedwithachecklistandphonetextmessagesfeasibleinsouthafricanprimaryhealthcaresettingsarandomizedtrial
AT daskilewiczkristen isselfassessmentofmedicalabortionusingalowsensitivitypregnancytestcombinedwithachecklistandphonetextmessagesfeasibleinsouthafricanprimaryhealthcaresettingsarandomizedtrial
AT myerlandon isselfassessmentofmedicalabortionusingalowsensitivitypregnancytestcombinedwithachecklistandphonetextmessagesfeasibleinsouthafricanprimaryhealthcaresettingsarandomizedtrial
AT gemzelldanielssonkristina isselfassessmentofmedicalabortionusingalowsensitivitypregnancytestcombinedwithachecklistandphonetextmessagesfeasibleinsouthafricanprimaryhealthcaresettingsarandomizedtrial