Cargando…

The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study

BACKGROUND: The effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) for lateral ridge augmentation has been poorly addressed. This case-controlled study aimed to investigate potential effect of membrane exposure lateral ridge augmentation and subsequent implant placement. METHODS: A total...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eskan, Mehmet A., Girouard, Marie-Eve, Morton, Dean, Greenwell, Henry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5481288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28643223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0089-z
_version_ 1783245367306878976
author Eskan, Mehmet A.
Girouard, Marie-Eve
Morton, Dean
Greenwell, Henry
author_facet Eskan, Mehmet A.
Girouard, Marie-Eve
Morton, Dean
Greenwell, Henry
author_sort Eskan, Mehmet A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) for lateral ridge augmentation has been poorly addressed. This case-controlled study aimed to investigate potential effect of membrane exposure lateral ridge augmentation and subsequent implant placement. METHODS: A total of 14 patients that did receive lateral ridge augmentation procedure using allogeneic cancellous graft particulate in combination with an alloplastic bioresorbable matrix barrier were retrospectively selected for this study. Bone width was measured at the crest with a digital caliper before bone augmentation and at the reopening for implant placement 4 months later for all patients. Cases where primary flap closure was achieved and the barrier did not expose throughout the time until implant placement were assigned to the control group (n = 7). Cases where primary closure could not be achieved or a barrier exposure happened within the first week following the initial surgery were assigned to the test group. RESULTS: The measured alveolar ridge width before surgery as well as after GBR procedure were not statistically significant different between the two groups (p > 0.05). Both groups showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase in their mean alveolar ridge width 4 months after later augmentation procedure, from 3.4 ± 1.2 to 6.0 ± 1.1 mm in the control group and from 3.6 ± 1.0 to 5.0 ± 1.4 mm in the test group. However, the mean alveolar ridge gain was significantly greater in the control group than in the test group (p < 0.05). Consequently, the reduction of the augmented alveolar ridge was significantly higher in the test group averaging to 4.7 mm than for the control group showing a loss of 3.1 mm after 4 months, respectively. However, in all 14 cases, successful implant placement was achieved after 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limit of this study, it can be concluded that early exposure of a bioresorbable matrix barrier during lateral ridge augmentation may compromise the results of the GBR procedure but may still result in a favorable alveolar ridge width gain that allows for the placement of dental implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5481288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54812882017-07-09 The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study Eskan, Mehmet A. Girouard, Marie-Eve Morton, Dean Greenwell, Henry Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: The effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) for lateral ridge augmentation has been poorly addressed. This case-controlled study aimed to investigate potential effect of membrane exposure lateral ridge augmentation and subsequent implant placement. METHODS: A total of 14 patients that did receive lateral ridge augmentation procedure using allogeneic cancellous graft particulate in combination with an alloplastic bioresorbable matrix barrier were retrospectively selected for this study. Bone width was measured at the crest with a digital caliper before bone augmentation and at the reopening for implant placement 4 months later for all patients. Cases where primary flap closure was achieved and the barrier did not expose throughout the time until implant placement were assigned to the control group (n = 7). Cases where primary closure could not be achieved or a barrier exposure happened within the first week following the initial surgery were assigned to the test group. RESULTS: The measured alveolar ridge width before surgery as well as after GBR procedure were not statistically significant different between the two groups (p > 0.05). Both groups showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase in their mean alveolar ridge width 4 months after later augmentation procedure, from 3.4 ± 1.2 to 6.0 ± 1.1 mm in the control group and from 3.6 ± 1.0 to 5.0 ± 1.4 mm in the test group. However, the mean alveolar ridge gain was significantly greater in the control group than in the test group (p < 0.05). Consequently, the reduction of the augmented alveolar ridge was significantly higher in the test group averaging to 4.7 mm than for the control group showing a loss of 3.1 mm after 4 months, respectively. However, in all 14 cases, successful implant placement was achieved after 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limit of this study, it can be concluded that early exposure of a bioresorbable matrix barrier during lateral ridge augmentation may compromise the results of the GBR procedure but may still result in a favorable alveolar ridge width gain that allows for the placement of dental implants. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5481288/ /pubmed/28643223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0089-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Eskan, Mehmet A.
Girouard, Marie-Eve
Morton, Dean
Greenwell, Henry
The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
title The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
title_full The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
title_fullStr The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
title_short The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
title_sort effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5481288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28643223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0089-z
work_keys_str_mv AT eskanmehmeta theeffectofmembraneexposureonlateralridgeaugmentationacasecontrolledstudy
AT girouardmarieeve theeffectofmembraneexposureonlateralridgeaugmentationacasecontrolledstudy
AT mortondean theeffectofmembraneexposureonlateralridgeaugmentationacasecontrolledstudy
AT greenwellhenry theeffectofmembraneexposureonlateralridgeaugmentationacasecontrolledstudy
AT eskanmehmeta effectofmembraneexposureonlateralridgeaugmentationacasecontrolledstudy
AT girouardmarieeve effectofmembraneexposureonlateralridgeaugmentationacasecontrolledstudy
AT mortondean effectofmembraneexposureonlateralridgeaugmentationacasecontrolledstudy
AT greenwellhenry effectofmembraneexposureonlateralridgeaugmentationacasecontrolledstudy