Cargando…

Polymicrobial and Monomicrobial Infections after Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Study to Determine which Infection is more Severe

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective clinical review. PURPOSE: To investigate the difference in clinical manifestations and severity between polymicrobial and monomicrobial infections after spinal surgery. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Surgical site infections (SSIs) after spinal surgery are a major diagnostic a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Shaoqiang, Qi, Qiang, Chen, Zhongqiang, Liu, Ning, Guo, Zhaoqing, Sun, Chuiguo, Li, Weishi, Zeng, Yan, Liu, Zhongjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5481598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28670411
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.3.427
_version_ 1783245417483337728
author Liu, Shaoqiang
Qi, Qiang
Chen, Zhongqiang
Liu, Ning
Guo, Zhaoqing
Sun, Chuiguo
Li, Weishi
Zeng, Yan
Liu, Zhongjun
author_facet Liu, Shaoqiang
Qi, Qiang
Chen, Zhongqiang
Liu, Ning
Guo, Zhaoqing
Sun, Chuiguo
Li, Weishi
Zeng, Yan
Liu, Zhongjun
author_sort Liu, Shaoqiang
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective clinical review. PURPOSE: To investigate the difference in clinical manifestations and severity between polymicrobial and monomicrobial infections after spinal surgery. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Surgical site infections (SSIs) after spinal surgery are a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for spinal surgeons. Polymicrobial infections after spinal surgery seem to result in poorer outcomes than monomicrobial infections because of complementary resistance to antibiotics. However, comparison of the clinical manifestations and severity between polymicrobial and monomicrobial infections are limited. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with SSIs after spinal surgery were studied: 20 patients with polymicrobial infections and 47 with monomicrobial infections. Pathogenic bacteria identified were counted and classified. Age, sex, and body mass index were compared between the two groups to identify homogeneity. The groups were compared for clinical manifestations by surgical site, postoperative time to infection, infection site, incisional drainage, incisional swelling, incisional pain, neurological signs, temperature, white blood cell count, and the percentage of neutrophils. Finally, the groups were compared for severity by hospital stay, number of rehospitalizations, number of debridements, duration of antibiotics administration, number of antibiotics administered, and implant removal. RESULTS: Polymicrobial infections comprised 29.9% of SSIs after spinal surgery, and most polymicrobial infections (70.0%) were caused by two species of bacteria only. There was no difference between the groups in terms of clinical manifestations and severity. In total, 96 bacterial strains were isolated from the spinal wounds: 60 strains were gram-positive and 36 were gram-negative pathogenic bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter cloacae were cultured in order of the frequency of appearance. CONCLUSIONS: Most polymicrobial infections were caused by two bacterial species after spinal surgery. There was no difference in clinical manifestations or severity between polymicrobial and monomicrobial infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5481598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54815982017-06-30 Polymicrobial and Monomicrobial Infections after Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Study to Determine which Infection is more Severe Liu, Shaoqiang Qi, Qiang Chen, Zhongqiang Liu, Ning Guo, Zhaoqing Sun, Chuiguo Li, Weishi Zeng, Yan Liu, Zhongjun Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective clinical review. PURPOSE: To investigate the difference in clinical manifestations and severity between polymicrobial and monomicrobial infections after spinal surgery. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Surgical site infections (SSIs) after spinal surgery are a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for spinal surgeons. Polymicrobial infections after spinal surgery seem to result in poorer outcomes than monomicrobial infections because of complementary resistance to antibiotics. However, comparison of the clinical manifestations and severity between polymicrobial and monomicrobial infections are limited. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with SSIs after spinal surgery were studied: 20 patients with polymicrobial infections and 47 with monomicrobial infections. Pathogenic bacteria identified were counted and classified. Age, sex, and body mass index were compared between the two groups to identify homogeneity. The groups were compared for clinical manifestations by surgical site, postoperative time to infection, infection site, incisional drainage, incisional swelling, incisional pain, neurological signs, temperature, white blood cell count, and the percentage of neutrophils. Finally, the groups were compared for severity by hospital stay, number of rehospitalizations, number of debridements, duration of antibiotics administration, number of antibiotics administered, and implant removal. RESULTS: Polymicrobial infections comprised 29.9% of SSIs after spinal surgery, and most polymicrobial infections (70.0%) were caused by two species of bacteria only. There was no difference between the groups in terms of clinical manifestations and severity. In total, 96 bacterial strains were isolated from the spinal wounds: 60 strains were gram-positive and 36 were gram-negative pathogenic bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter cloacae were cultured in order of the frequency of appearance. CONCLUSIONS: Most polymicrobial infections were caused by two bacterial species after spinal surgery. There was no difference in clinical manifestations or severity between polymicrobial and monomicrobial infections. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2017-06 2017-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5481598/ /pubmed/28670411 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.3.427 Text en Copyright © 2017 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Liu, Shaoqiang
Qi, Qiang
Chen, Zhongqiang
Liu, Ning
Guo, Zhaoqing
Sun, Chuiguo
Li, Weishi
Zeng, Yan
Liu, Zhongjun
Polymicrobial and Monomicrobial Infections after Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Study to Determine which Infection is more Severe
title Polymicrobial and Monomicrobial Infections after Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Study to Determine which Infection is more Severe
title_full Polymicrobial and Monomicrobial Infections after Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Study to Determine which Infection is more Severe
title_fullStr Polymicrobial and Monomicrobial Infections after Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Study to Determine which Infection is more Severe
title_full_unstemmed Polymicrobial and Monomicrobial Infections after Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Study to Determine which Infection is more Severe
title_short Polymicrobial and Monomicrobial Infections after Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Study to Determine which Infection is more Severe
title_sort polymicrobial and monomicrobial infections after spinal surgery: a retrospective study to determine which infection is more severe
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5481598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28670411
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.3.427
work_keys_str_mv AT liushaoqiang polymicrobialandmonomicrobialinfectionsafterspinalsurgeryaretrospectivestudytodeterminewhichinfectionismoresevere
AT qiqiang polymicrobialandmonomicrobialinfectionsafterspinalsurgeryaretrospectivestudytodeterminewhichinfectionismoresevere
AT chenzhongqiang polymicrobialandmonomicrobialinfectionsafterspinalsurgeryaretrospectivestudytodeterminewhichinfectionismoresevere
AT liuning polymicrobialandmonomicrobialinfectionsafterspinalsurgeryaretrospectivestudytodeterminewhichinfectionismoresevere
AT guozhaoqing polymicrobialandmonomicrobialinfectionsafterspinalsurgeryaretrospectivestudytodeterminewhichinfectionismoresevere
AT sunchuiguo polymicrobialandmonomicrobialinfectionsafterspinalsurgeryaretrospectivestudytodeterminewhichinfectionismoresevere
AT liweishi polymicrobialandmonomicrobialinfectionsafterspinalsurgeryaretrospectivestudytodeterminewhichinfectionismoresevere
AT zengyan polymicrobialandmonomicrobialinfectionsafterspinalsurgeryaretrospectivestudytodeterminewhichinfectionismoresevere
AT liuzhongjun polymicrobialandmonomicrobialinfectionsafterspinalsurgeryaretrospectivestudytodeterminewhichinfectionismoresevere