Cargando…

Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most important parameter for the assessment of renal function. GFR by plasma sampling technique is considered accurate in the selection of donors for renal transplantation. Estimated GFR (eGFR) calculations using Gates’ method and Modific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Manish, Arora, Geetanjali, Damle, Nishikant Avinash, Kumar, Praveen, Tripathi, Madhavi, Bal, Chandrasekhar, Taywade, Sameer Kamlakar, Singhal, Abhinav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680201
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_17_17
_version_ 1783245501695524864
author Kumar, Manish
Arora, Geetanjali
Damle, Nishikant Avinash
Kumar, Praveen
Tripathi, Madhavi
Bal, Chandrasekhar
Taywade, Sameer Kamlakar
Singhal, Abhinav
author_facet Kumar, Manish
Arora, Geetanjali
Damle, Nishikant Avinash
Kumar, Praveen
Tripathi, Madhavi
Bal, Chandrasekhar
Taywade, Sameer Kamlakar
Singhal, Abhinav
author_sort Kumar, Manish
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most important parameter for the assessment of renal function. GFR by plasma sampling technique is considered accurate in the selection of donors for renal transplantation. Estimated GFR (eGFR) calculations using Gates’ method and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft–Gault (CG) equations are simple methods but have not been validated in the Indian population. Hence, we aimed to assess the correlation between these three techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The plasma sampling technique was done using two samples at 60 and 180 min after injection of 1 mCi (37MBq) (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) in 66 healthy donors. Age, sex, height, weight, and plasma creatinine were recorded. Normalized GFR (nGFR) by two-sample method and eGFR (for Gates’, MDRD, and CG) values were calculated using formulae. RESULTS: There were 14 male and 52 female donors. Mean age was 46.56 ± 12.88 years (24–69 years). Mean height was 153.74 ± 8.35 cm, whereas mean weight was 56.97 ± 11.88 kg. Mean nGFR value was 80.4 for two-sample method while mean eGFR value for Gates’, CG, and MDRD were 83.3, 89.36, and 97.47 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (eligibility value at our institution = 70), respectively. While the correlation between nGFR and eGFR CG and MDRD was weak moderate (correlation coefficient = 0.5), nGFR and eGFR Gates’ had a moderate correlation (0.686). Mean total bias for eGFR Gates’, CG, and MDRD were 2.87, 8.93, and 17.0, respectively. P(30) of eGFR Gates’, CG and MDRD were 60.6%, 57.6%, and 62.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the large variability in eGFR Gates’, CG and MDRD, nGFR estimation using the plasma sampling technique with (99m)Tc-DTPA appears necessary while screening healthy donors for renal transplantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5482013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54820132017-07-06 Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population Kumar, Manish Arora, Geetanjali Damle, Nishikant Avinash Kumar, Praveen Tripathi, Madhavi Bal, Chandrasekhar Taywade, Sameer Kamlakar Singhal, Abhinav Indian J Nucl Med Original Article PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most important parameter for the assessment of renal function. GFR by plasma sampling technique is considered accurate in the selection of donors for renal transplantation. Estimated GFR (eGFR) calculations using Gates’ method and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft–Gault (CG) equations are simple methods but have not been validated in the Indian population. Hence, we aimed to assess the correlation between these three techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The plasma sampling technique was done using two samples at 60 and 180 min after injection of 1 mCi (37MBq) (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) in 66 healthy donors. Age, sex, height, weight, and plasma creatinine were recorded. Normalized GFR (nGFR) by two-sample method and eGFR (for Gates’, MDRD, and CG) values were calculated using formulae. RESULTS: There were 14 male and 52 female donors. Mean age was 46.56 ± 12.88 years (24–69 years). Mean height was 153.74 ± 8.35 cm, whereas mean weight was 56.97 ± 11.88 kg. Mean nGFR value was 80.4 for two-sample method while mean eGFR value for Gates’, CG, and MDRD were 83.3, 89.36, and 97.47 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (eligibility value at our institution = 70), respectively. While the correlation between nGFR and eGFR CG and MDRD was weak moderate (correlation coefficient = 0.5), nGFR and eGFR Gates’ had a moderate correlation (0.686). Mean total bias for eGFR Gates’, CG, and MDRD were 2.87, 8.93, and 17.0, respectively. P(30) of eGFR Gates’, CG and MDRD were 60.6%, 57.6%, and 62.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the large variability in eGFR Gates’, CG and MDRD, nGFR estimation using the plasma sampling technique with (99m)Tc-DTPA appears necessary while screening healthy donors for renal transplantation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5482013/ /pubmed/28680201 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_17_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, Manish
Arora, Geetanjali
Damle, Nishikant Avinash
Kumar, Praveen
Tripathi, Madhavi
Bal, Chandrasekhar
Taywade, Sameer Kamlakar
Singhal, Abhinav
Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population
title Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population
title_full Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population
title_fullStr Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population
title_short Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population
title_sort comparison between two-sample method with (99m)tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, gates’ method and estimated glomerular filtration rate values by formula based methods in healthy kidney donor population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680201
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_17_17
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarmanish comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation
AT arorageetanjali comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation
AT damlenishikantavinash comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation
AT kumarpraveen comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation
AT tripathimadhavi comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation
AT balchandrasekhar comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation
AT taywadesameerkamlakar comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation
AT singhalabhinav comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation