Cargando…
Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most important parameter for the assessment of renal function. GFR by plasma sampling technique is considered accurate in the selection of donors for renal transplantation. Estimated GFR (eGFR) calculations using Gates’ method and Modific...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680201 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_17_17 |
_version_ | 1783245501695524864 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Manish Arora, Geetanjali Damle, Nishikant Avinash Kumar, Praveen Tripathi, Madhavi Bal, Chandrasekhar Taywade, Sameer Kamlakar Singhal, Abhinav |
author_facet | Kumar, Manish Arora, Geetanjali Damle, Nishikant Avinash Kumar, Praveen Tripathi, Madhavi Bal, Chandrasekhar Taywade, Sameer Kamlakar Singhal, Abhinav |
author_sort | Kumar, Manish |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most important parameter for the assessment of renal function. GFR by plasma sampling technique is considered accurate in the selection of donors for renal transplantation. Estimated GFR (eGFR) calculations using Gates’ method and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft–Gault (CG) equations are simple methods but have not been validated in the Indian population. Hence, we aimed to assess the correlation between these three techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The plasma sampling technique was done using two samples at 60 and 180 min after injection of 1 mCi (37MBq) (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) in 66 healthy donors. Age, sex, height, weight, and plasma creatinine were recorded. Normalized GFR (nGFR) by two-sample method and eGFR (for Gates’, MDRD, and CG) values were calculated using formulae. RESULTS: There were 14 male and 52 female donors. Mean age was 46.56 ± 12.88 years (24–69 years). Mean height was 153.74 ± 8.35 cm, whereas mean weight was 56.97 ± 11.88 kg. Mean nGFR value was 80.4 for two-sample method while mean eGFR value for Gates’, CG, and MDRD were 83.3, 89.36, and 97.47 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (eligibility value at our institution = 70), respectively. While the correlation between nGFR and eGFR CG and MDRD was weak moderate (correlation coefficient = 0.5), nGFR and eGFR Gates’ had a moderate correlation (0.686). Mean total bias for eGFR Gates’, CG, and MDRD were 2.87, 8.93, and 17.0, respectively. P(30) of eGFR Gates’, CG and MDRD were 60.6%, 57.6%, and 62.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the large variability in eGFR Gates’, CG and MDRD, nGFR estimation using the plasma sampling technique with (99m)Tc-DTPA appears necessary while screening healthy donors for renal transplantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5482013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54820132017-07-06 Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population Kumar, Manish Arora, Geetanjali Damle, Nishikant Avinash Kumar, Praveen Tripathi, Madhavi Bal, Chandrasekhar Taywade, Sameer Kamlakar Singhal, Abhinav Indian J Nucl Med Original Article PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most important parameter for the assessment of renal function. GFR by plasma sampling technique is considered accurate in the selection of donors for renal transplantation. Estimated GFR (eGFR) calculations using Gates’ method and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft–Gault (CG) equations are simple methods but have not been validated in the Indian population. Hence, we aimed to assess the correlation between these three techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The plasma sampling technique was done using two samples at 60 and 180 min after injection of 1 mCi (37MBq) (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) in 66 healthy donors. Age, sex, height, weight, and plasma creatinine were recorded. Normalized GFR (nGFR) by two-sample method and eGFR (for Gates’, MDRD, and CG) values were calculated using formulae. RESULTS: There were 14 male and 52 female donors. Mean age was 46.56 ± 12.88 years (24–69 years). Mean height was 153.74 ± 8.35 cm, whereas mean weight was 56.97 ± 11.88 kg. Mean nGFR value was 80.4 for two-sample method while mean eGFR value for Gates’, CG, and MDRD were 83.3, 89.36, and 97.47 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (eligibility value at our institution = 70), respectively. While the correlation between nGFR and eGFR CG and MDRD was weak moderate (correlation coefficient = 0.5), nGFR and eGFR Gates’ had a moderate correlation (0.686). Mean total bias for eGFR Gates’, CG, and MDRD were 2.87, 8.93, and 17.0, respectively. P(30) of eGFR Gates’, CG and MDRD were 60.6%, 57.6%, and 62.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the large variability in eGFR Gates’, CG and MDRD, nGFR estimation using the plasma sampling technique with (99m)Tc-DTPA appears necessary while screening healthy donors for renal transplantation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5482013/ /pubmed/28680201 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_17_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kumar, Manish Arora, Geetanjali Damle, Nishikant Avinash Kumar, Praveen Tripathi, Madhavi Bal, Chandrasekhar Taywade, Sameer Kamlakar Singhal, Abhinav Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population |
title | Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population |
title_full | Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population |
title_short | Comparison between Two-sample Method with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates’ Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population |
title_sort | comparison between two-sample method with (99m)tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, gates’ method and estimated glomerular filtration rate values by formula based methods in healthy kidney donor population |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680201 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_17_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarmanish comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation AT arorageetanjali comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation AT damlenishikantavinash comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation AT kumarpraveen comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation AT tripathimadhavi comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation AT balchandrasekhar comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation AT taywadesameerkamlakar comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation AT singhalabhinav comparisonbetweentwosamplemethodwith99mtcdiethylenetriaminepentaaceticacidgatesmethodandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratevaluesbyformulabasedmethodsinhealthykidneydonorpopulation |