Cargando…

Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering

A variety of engineered scaffolds have been created for tissue engineering using polymers, ceramics and their composites. Biomimicry has been adopted for majority of the three-dimensional (3D) scaffold design both in terms of physicochemical properties, as well as bioactivity for superior tissue reg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stratton, Scott, Shelke, Namdev B., Hoshino, Kazunori, Rudraiah, Swetha, Kumbar, Sangamesh G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: KeAi Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28653043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.11.001
_version_ 1783245583637544960
author Stratton, Scott
Shelke, Namdev B.
Hoshino, Kazunori
Rudraiah, Swetha
Kumbar, Sangamesh G.
author_facet Stratton, Scott
Shelke, Namdev B.
Hoshino, Kazunori
Rudraiah, Swetha
Kumbar, Sangamesh G.
author_sort Stratton, Scott
collection PubMed
description A variety of engineered scaffolds have been created for tissue engineering using polymers, ceramics and their composites. Biomimicry has been adopted for majority of the three-dimensional (3D) scaffold design both in terms of physicochemical properties, as well as bioactivity for superior tissue regeneration. Scaffolds fabricated via salt leaching, particle sintering, hydrogels and lithography have been successful in promoting cell growth in vitro and tissue regeneration in vivo. Scaffold systems derived from decellularization of whole organs or tissues has been popular due to their assured biocompatibility and bioactivity. Traditional scaffold fabrication techniques often failed to create intricate structures with greater resolution, not reproducible and involved multiple steps. The 3D printing technology overcome several limitations of the traditional techniques and made it easier to adopt several thermoplastics and hydrogels to create micro-nanostructured scaffolds and devices for tissue engineering and drug delivery. This review highlights scaffold fabrication methodologies with a focus on optimizing scaffold performance through the matrix pores, bioactivity and degradation rate to enable tissue regeneration. Review highlights few examples of bioactive scaffold mediated nerve, muscle, tendon/ligament and bone regeneration. Regardless of the efforts required for optimization, a shift in 3D scaffold uses from the laboratory into everyday life is expected in the near future as some of the methods discussed in this review become more streamlined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5482547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher KeAi Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54825472017-12-01 Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering Stratton, Scott Shelke, Namdev B. Hoshino, Kazunori Rudraiah, Swetha Kumbar, Sangamesh G. Bioact Mater Bioactive polymers and gel A variety of engineered scaffolds have been created for tissue engineering using polymers, ceramics and their composites. Biomimicry has been adopted for majority of the three-dimensional (3D) scaffold design both in terms of physicochemical properties, as well as bioactivity for superior tissue regeneration. Scaffolds fabricated via salt leaching, particle sintering, hydrogels and lithography have been successful in promoting cell growth in vitro and tissue regeneration in vivo. Scaffold systems derived from decellularization of whole organs or tissues has been popular due to their assured biocompatibility and bioactivity. Traditional scaffold fabrication techniques often failed to create intricate structures with greater resolution, not reproducible and involved multiple steps. The 3D printing technology overcome several limitations of the traditional techniques and made it easier to adopt several thermoplastics and hydrogels to create micro-nanostructured scaffolds and devices for tissue engineering and drug delivery. This review highlights scaffold fabrication methodologies with a focus on optimizing scaffold performance through the matrix pores, bioactivity and degradation rate to enable tissue regeneration. Review highlights few examples of bioactive scaffold mediated nerve, muscle, tendon/ligament and bone regeneration. Regardless of the efforts required for optimization, a shift in 3D scaffold uses from the laboratory into everyday life is expected in the near future as some of the methods discussed in this review become more streamlined. KeAi Publishing 2016-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5482547/ /pubmed/28653043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.11.001 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Bioactive polymers and gel
Stratton, Scott
Shelke, Namdev B.
Hoshino, Kazunori
Rudraiah, Swetha
Kumbar, Sangamesh G.
Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering
title Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_full Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_fullStr Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_full_unstemmed Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_short Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_sort bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering
topic Bioactive polymers and gel
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28653043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT strattonscott bioactivepolymericscaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT shelkenamdevb bioactivepolymericscaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT hoshinokazunori bioactivepolymericscaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT rudraiahswetha bioactivepolymericscaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT kumbarsangameshg bioactivepolymericscaffoldsfortissueengineering