Cargando…

Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND: This study determined whether axillary ultrasound (AUS) accurately predicted the status of axillary lymph nodes of patients who received different number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2015, 656 cases of patients with breast cancers who r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Bei-Bei, Zhao, Hong-Meng, Yu, Yue, Ge, Jie, Wang, Xin, Cao, Xu-Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852041
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13313
_version_ 1783245613612138496
author Ye, Bei-Bei
Zhao, Hong-Meng
Yu, Yue
Ge, Jie
Wang, Xin
Cao, Xu-Chen
author_facet Ye, Bei-Bei
Zhao, Hong-Meng
Yu, Yue
Ge, Jie
Wang, Xin
Cao, Xu-Chen
author_sort Ye, Bei-Bei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study determined whether axillary ultrasound (AUS) accurately predicted the status of axillary lymph nodes of patients who received different number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2015, 656 cases of patients with breast cancers who received NAC and had subsequent axillary lymph node dissection were included in this study. The findings of preoperative AUS were tested by pathological examination. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of AUS for patients who received two-, four-, and six-cycle NAC. RESULTS: In the two-cycle subgroup, the sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 80.2% (95% CI: 74.3%-86.2%), 61.4% (95% CI: 48.8%-74.0%) and 6.64 (95% CI: 3.36-12.4) respectively. In the four-cycle subgroup, the Sn, Sp and DOR were 69.7% (95% CI: 62.2%-77.1%), 66.1% (95% CI: 53.7%-78.5%) and 4.47 (95% CI: 2.32-8.62), respectively. In the six-cycle subgroup, the Sn, Sp and DOR were 56.7% (95% CI: 49.5%-64.0%), 74.5% (95% CI: 62.8%-87.2%) and 3.83 (95% CI: 1.863-7.86), respectively. Furthermore, the patients with normal AUS findings after six cycles of NAC have few positive nodes than patients with suspicious findings (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative AUS is a potentially useful imaging modality to predict the pathologic status of the axillary within four cycles of NAC. Although the accuracy is lower for patients who completed six cycles of NAC than that who received four- and two- cycles, the number of positive lymph nodes for patients with normal findings on AUS is low.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5482689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54826892017-06-27 Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients Ye, Bei-Bei Zhao, Hong-Meng Yu, Yue Ge, Jie Wang, Xin Cao, Xu-Chen Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper BACKGROUND: This study determined whether axillary ultrasound (AUS) accurately predicted the status of axillary lymph nodes of patients who received different number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2015, 656 cases of patients with breast cancers who received NAC and had subsequent axillary lymph node dissection were included in this study. The findings of preoperative AUS were tested by pathological examination. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of AUS for patients who received two-, four-, and six-cycle NAC. RESULTS: In the two-cycle subgroup, the sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 80.2% (95% CI: 74.3%-86.2%), 61.4% (95% CI: 48.8%-74.0%) and 6.64 (95% CI: 3.36-12.4) respectively. In the four-cycle subgroup, the Sn, Sp and DOR were 69.7% (95% CI: 62.2%-77.1%), 66.1% (95% CI: 53.7%-78.5%) and 4.47 (95% CI: 2.32-8.62), respectively. In the six-cycle subgroup, the Sn, Sp and DOR were 56.7% (95% CI: 49.5%-64.0%), 74.5% (95% CI: 62.8%-87.2%) and 3.83 (95% CI: 1.863-7.86), respectively. Furthermore, the patients with normal AUS findings after six cycles of NAC have few positive nodes than patients with suspicious findings (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative AUS is a potentially useful imaging modality to predict the pathologic status of the axillary within four cycles of NAC. Although the accuracy is lower for patients who completed six cycles of NAC than that who received four- and two- cycles, the number of positive lymph nodes for patients with normal findings on AUS is low. Impact Journals LLC 2016-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5482689/ /pubmed/27852041 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13313 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Ye et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Paper
Ye, Bei-Bei
Zhao, Hong-Meng
Yu, Yue
Ge, Jie
Wang, Xin
Cao, Xu-Chen
Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients
title Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients
title_full Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients
title_fullStr Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients
title_short Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients
title_sort accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients
topic Clinical Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852041
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13313
work_keys_str_mv AT yebeibei accuracyofaxillaryultrasoundafterdifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesinbreastcancerpatients
AT zhaohongmeng accuracyofaxillaryultrasoundafterdifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesinbreastcancerpatients
AT yuyue accuracyofaxillaryultrasoundafterdifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesinbreastcancerpatients
AT gejie accuracyofaxillaryultrasoundafterdifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesinbreastcancerpatients
AT wangxin accuracyofaxillaryultrasoundafterdifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesinbreastcancerpatients
AT caoxuchen accuracyofaxillaryultrasoundafterdifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesinbreastcancerpatients