Cargando…
Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients
BACKGROUND: This study determined whether axillary ultrasound (AUS) accurately predicted the status of axillary lymph nodes of patients who received different number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2015, 656 cases of patients with breast cancers who r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852041 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13313 |
_version_ | 1783245613612138496 |
---|---|
author | Ye, Bei-Bei Zhao, Hong-Meng Yu, Yue Ge, Jie Wang, Xin Cao, Xu-Chen |
author_facet | Ye, Bei-Bei Zhao, Hong-Meng Yu, Yue Ge, Jie Wang, Xin Cao, Xu-Chen |
author_sort | Ye, Bei-Bei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study determined whether axillary ultrasound (AUS) accurately predicted the status of axillary lymph nodes of patients who received different number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2015, 656 cases of patients with breast cancers who received NAC and had subsequent axillary lymph node dissection were included in this study. The findings of preoperative AUS were tested by pathological examination. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of AUS for patients who received two-, four-, and six-cycle NAC. RESULTS: In the two-cycle subgroup, the sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 80.2% (95% CI: 74.3%-86.2%), 61.4% (95% CI: 48.8%-74.0%) and 6.64 (95% CI: 3.36-12.4) respectively. In the four-cycle subgroup, the Sn, Sp and DOR were 69.7% (95% CI: 62.2%-77.1%), 66.1% (95% CI: 53.7%-78.5%) and 4.47 (95% CI: 2.32-8.62), respectively. In the six-cycle subgroup, the Sn, Sp and DOR were 56.7% (95% CI: 49.5%-64.0%), 74.5% (95% CI: 62.8%-87.2%) and 3.83 (95% CI: 1.863-7.86), respectively. Furthermore, the patients with normal AUS findings after six cycles of NAC have few positive nodes than patients with suspicious findings (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative AUS is a potentially useful imaging modality to predict the pathologic status of the axillary within four cycles of NAC. Although the accuracy is lower for patients who completed six cycles of NAC than that who received four- and two- cycles, the number of positive lymph nodes for patients with normal findings on AUS is low. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5482689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54826892017-06-27 Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients Ye, Bei-Bei Zhao, Hong-Meng Yu, Yue Ge, Jie Wang, Xin Cao, Xu-Chen Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper BACKGROUND: This study determined whether axillary ultrasound (AUS) accurately predicted the status of axillary lymph nodes of patients who received different number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2015, 656 cases of patients with breast cancers who received NAC and had subsequent axillary lymph node dissection were included in this study. The findings of preoperative AUS were tested by pathological examination. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of AUS for patients who received two-, four-, and six-cycle NAC. RESULTS: In the two-cycle subgroup, the sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 80.2% (95% CI: 74.3%-86.2%), 61.4% (95% CI: 48.8%-74.0%) and 6.64 (95% CI: 3.36-12.4) respectively. In the four-cycle subgroup, the Sn, Sp and DOR were 69.7% (95% CI: 62.2%-77.1%), 66.1% (95% CI: 53.7%-78.5%) and 4.47 (95% CI: 2.32-8.62), respectively. In the six-cycle subgroup, the Sn, Sp and DOR were 56.7% (95% CI: 49.5%-64.0%), 74.5% (95% CI: 62.8%-87.2%) and 3.83 (95% CI: 1.863-7.86), respectively. Furthermore, the patients with normal AUS findings after six cycles of NAC have few positive nodes than patients with suspicious findings (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative AUS is a potentially useful imaging modality to predict the pathologic status of the axillary within four cycles of NAC. Although the accuracy is lower for patients who completed six cycles of NAC than that who received four- and two- cycles, the number of positive lymph nodes for patients with normal findings on AUS is low. Impact Journals LLC 2016-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5482689/ /pubmed/27852041 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13313 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Ye et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Paper Ye, Bei-Bei Zhao, Hong-Meng Yu, Yue Ge, Jie Wang, Xin Cao, Xu-Chen Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients |
title | Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients |
title_full | Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients |
title_short | Accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients |
title_sort | accuracy of axillary ultrasound after different neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in breast cancer patients |
topic | Clinical Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852041 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yebeibei accuracyofaxillaryultrasoundafterdifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesinbreastcancerpatients AT zhaohongmeng accuracyofaxillaryultrasoundafterdifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesinbreastcancerpatients AT yuyue accuracyofaxillaryultrasoundafterdifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesinbreastcancerpatients AT gejie accuracyofaxillaryultrasoundafterdifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesinbreastcancerpatients AT wangxin accuracyofaxillaryultrasoundafterdifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesinbreastcancerpatients AT caoxuchen accuracyofaxillaryultrasoundafterdifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapycyclesinbreastcancerpatients |