Cargando…
The role of 'confounding by indication' in assessing the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes in general practice: results of a case-control study
BACKGROUND: In quality of care research, limited information is found on the relationship between quality of care and disease outcomes. This case-control study was conducted with the aim to assess the effect of guideline adherence for stroke prevention on the occurrence of stroke in general practice...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC548271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15676067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-5-10 |
_version_ | 1782122329599377408 |
---|---|
author | de Koning, Johan S Klazinga, Niek S Koudstaal, Peter J Prins, Ad Borsboom, Gerard JJM Mackenbach, Johan P |
author_facet | de Koning, Johan S Klazinga, Niek S Koudstaal, Peter J Prins, Ad Borsboom, Gerard JJM Mackenbach, Johan P |
author_sort | de Koning, Johan S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In quality of care research, limited information is found on the relationship between quality of care and disease outcomes. This case-control study was conducted with the aim to assess the effect of guideline adherence for stroke prevention on the occurrence of stroke in general practice. We report on the problems related to a variant of confounding by indication, that may be common in quality of care studies. METHODS: Stroke patients (cases) and controls were recruited from the general practitioner's (GP) patient register, and an expert panel assessed the quality of care of cases and controls using guideline-based review criteria. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients was assessed. Compared to patients without shortcomings in preventive care, patients who received sub-optimal care appeared to have a lower risk of experiencing a stroke (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.53). This result was partly explained by the presence of risk factors (6.1 per cases, 4.4 per control), as reflected by the finding that the OR came much closer to 1.00 after adjustment for the number of risk factors (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.29 to 2.30). Patients with more risk factors for stroke had a lower risk of sub-optimal care (OR for the number of risk factors present 0.76; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.94). This finding represents a variant of 'confounding by indication', which could not be fully adjusted for due to incomplete information on risk factors for stroke. CONCLUSIONS: At present, inaccurate recording of patient and risk factor information by GPs seriously limits the potential use of a case-control method to assess the effect of guideline adherence on disease outcome in general practice. We conclude that studies on the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes, like other observational studies of intended treatment effect, should be designed and performed such that confounding by indication is minimized. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-548271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-5482712005-02-06 The role of 'confounding by indication' in assessing the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes in general practice: results of a case-control study de Koning, Johan S Klazinga, Niek S Koudstaal, Peter J Prins, Ad Borsboom, Gerard JJM Mackenbach, Johan P BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In quality of care research, limited information is found on the relationship between quality of care and disease outcomes. This case-control study was conducted with the aim to assess the effect of guideline adherence for stroke prevention on the occurrence of stroke in general practice. We report on the problems related to a variant of confounding by indication, that may be common in quality of care studies. METHODS: Stroke patients (cases) and controls were recruited from the general practitioner's (GP) patient register, and an expert panel assessed the quality of care of cases and controls using guideline-based review criteria. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients was assessed. Compared to patients without shortcomings in preventive care, patients who received sub-optimal care appeared to have a lower risk of experiencing a stroke (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.53). This result was partly explained by the presence of risk factors (6.1 per cases, 4.4 per control), as reflected by the finding that the OR came much closer to 1.00 after adjustment for the number of risk factors (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.29 to 2.30). Patients with more risk factors for stroke had a lower risk of sub-optimal care (OR for the number of risk factors present 0.76; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.94). This finding represents a variant of 'confounding by indication', which could not be fully adjusted for due to incomplete information on risk factors for stroke. CONCLUSIONS: At present, inaccurate recording of patient and risk factor information by GPs seriously limits the potential use of a case-control method to assess the effect of guideline adherence on disease outcome in general practice. We conclude that studies on the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes, like other observational studies of intended treatment effect, should be designed and performed such that confounding by indication is minimized. BioMed Central 2005-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC548271/ /pubmed/15676067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-5-10 Text en Copyright © 2005 de Koning et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Koning, Johan S Klazinga, Niek S Koudstaal, Peter J Prins, Ad Borsboom, Gerard JJM Mackenbach, Johan P The role of 'confounding by indication' in assessing the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes in general practice: results of a case-control study |
title | The role of 'confounding by indication' in assessing the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes in general practice: results of a case-control study |
title_full | The role of 'confounding by indication' in assessing the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes in general practice: results of a case-control study |
title_fullStr | The role of 'confounding by indication' in assessing the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes in general practice: results of a case-control study |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of 'confounding by indication' in assessing the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes in general practice: results of a case-control study |
title_short | The role of 'confounding by indication' in assessing the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes in general practice: results of a case-control study |
title_sort | role of 'confounding by indication' in assessing the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes in general practice: results of a case-control study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC548271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15676067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-5-10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dekoningjohans theroleofconfoundingbyindicationinassessingtheeffectofqualityofcareondiseaseoutcomesingeneralpracticeresultsofacasecontrolstudy AT klazinganieks theroleofconfoundingbyindicationinassessingtheeffectofqualityofcareondiseaseoutcomesingeneralpracticeresultsofacasecontrolstudy AT koudstaalpeterj theroleofconfoundingbyindicationinassessingtheeffectofqualityofcareondiseaseoutcomesingeneralpracticeresultsofacasecontrolstudy AT prinsad theroleofconfoundingbyindicationinassessingtheeffectofqualityofcareondiseaseoutcomesingeneralpracticeresultsofacasecontrolstudy AT borsboomgerardjjm theroleofconfoundingbyindicationinassessingtheeffectofqualityofcareondiseaseoutcomesingeneralpracticeresultsofacasecontrolstudy AT mackenbachjohanp theroleofconfoundingbyindicationinassessingtheeffectofqualityofcareondiseaseoutcomesingeneralpracticeresultsofacasecontrolstudy AT dekoningjohans roleofconfoundingbyindicationinassessingtheeffectofqualityofcareondiseaseoutcomesingeneralpracticeresultsofacasecontrolstudy AT klazinganieks roleofconfoundingbyindicationinassessingtheeffectofqualityofcareondiseaseoutcomesingeneralpracticeresultsofacasecontrolstudy AT koudstaalpeterj roleofconfoundingbyindicationinassessingtheeffectofqualityofcareondiseaseoutcomesingeneralpracticeresultsofacasecontrolstudy AT prinsad roleofconfoundingbyindicationinassessingtheeffectofqualityofcareondiseaseoutcomesingeneralpracticeresultsofacasecontrolstudy AT borsboomgerardjjm roleofconfoundingbyindicationinassessingtheeffectofqualityofcareondiseaseoutcomesingeneralpracticeresultsofacasecontrolstudy AT mackenbachjohanp roleofconfoundingbyindicationinassessingtheeffectofqualityofcareondiseaseoutcomesingeneralpracticeresultsofacasecontrolstudy |