Cargando…

Long-term results and recurrence patterns from SCALOP: a phase II randomised trial of gemcitabine- or capecitabine-based chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: SCALOP, a randomised, phase II trial, tested the activity and safety of gemcitabine (GEM)-based and capecitabine (CAP)-based chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Here we present the long-term outcomes. METHODS: Eligibility: histologically proven LAPC ⩽7 cm....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hurt, C N, Falk, S, Crosby, T, McDonald, A, Ray, R, Joseph, G, Staffurth, J, Abrams, R A, Griffiths, G, Maughan, T, Mukherjee, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.95
_version_ 1783245623742431232
author Hurt, C N
Falk, S
Crosby, T
McDonald, A
Ray, R
Joseph, G
Staffurth, J
Abrams, R A
Griffiths, G
Maughan, T
Mukherjee, S
author_facet Hurt, C N
Falk, S
Crosby, T
McDonald, A
Ray, R
Joseph, G
Staffurth, J
Abrams, R A
Griffiths, G
Maughan, T
Mukherjee, S
author_sort Hurt, C N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: SCALOP, a randomised, phase II trial, tested the activity and safety of gemcitabine (GEM)-based and capecitabine (CAP)-based chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Here we present the long-term outcomes. METHODS: Eligibility: histologically proven LAPC ⩽7 cm. Following 12 weeks of induction GEMCAP chemotherapy (three cycles: GEM 1000 mg m(−2) days 1, 8, 15; CAP 830 mg m(−2) days 1–21 q28 days) patients with stable/responding disease, tumour ⩽6 cm, and WHO Performance Status 0–1 were randomised to receive one cycle GEMCAP followed by CAP (830 mg m(−2) b.d. on weekdays only) or GEM (300 mg m(−2) weekly) with radiation (50.4 Gy per 28 fractions). RESULTS: One-hundred fourteen patients (28 UK centres) were registered between 24 December 2009 and 25 October 2011, and 74 were randomised (CAP-RT=36; GEM-RT=38). At the time of this analysis, 105 of the 114 patients had died and the surviving 9 patients had been followed up for a median of 10.9 months (IQR: 2.9–18.7). Updated median OS was 17.6 months (95% CI: 14.6–22.7) in the CAP-CRT arm and 14.6 months (95% CI: 11.1–16.0) in the GEM-CRT arm (intention-to-treat adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.68 (95% CI: 0.38–1.21, P=0.185)); median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 months (95% CI: 10.0–15.2) in the CAP-CRT arm and 10.4 months (95% CI: 8.8–12.7) in the GEM-CRT arm (intention-to-treat adjusted HR: 0.60 (95% CI: 0.32–1.14, P=0.120)). In baseline multivariable model, age ⩾65 years, better performance status, CA19.9<613 IU l(−1), and shorter tumour diameter predicted improved OS. CAP-CRT, age ⩾65 years, better performance status, CA19.9 <46 IU ml(−1) predicted improved OS and PFS in the pre-radiotherapy model. Nine-month PFS was highly predictive of OS. CONCLUSIONS: CAP-CRT remains the superior regimen. SCALOP showed that patients with CA19.9 <46 IU ml(−1) after induction chemotherapy are more likely to benefit from CRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5482737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54827372017-07-06 Long-term results and recurrence patterns from SCALOP: a phase II randomised trial of gemcitabine- or capecitabine-based chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer Hurt, C N Falk, S Crosby, T McDonald, A Ray, R Joseph, G Staffurth, J Abrams, R A Griffiths, G Maughan, T Mukherjee, S Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: SCALOP, a randomised, phase II trial, tested the activity and safety of gemcitabine (GEM)-based and capecitabine (CAP)-based chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Here we present the long-term outcomes. METHODS: Eligibility: histologically proven LAPC ⩽7 cm. Following 12 weeks of induction GEMCAP chemotherapy (three cycles: GEM 1000 mg m(−2) days 1, 8, 15; CAP 830 mg m(−2) days 1–21 q28 days) patients with stable/responding disease, tumour ⩽6 cm, and WHO Performance Status 0–1 were randomised to receive one cycle GEMCAP followed by CAP (830 mg m(−2) b.d. on weekdays only) or GEM (300 mg m(−2) weekly) with radiation (50.4 Gy per 28 fractions). RESULTS: One-hundred fourteen patients (28 UK centres) were registered between 24 December 2009 and 25 October 2011, and 74 were randomised (CAP-RT=36; GEM-RT=38). At the time of this analysis, 105 of the 114 patients had died and the surviving 9 patients had been followed up for a median of 10.9 months (IQR: 2.9–18.7). Updated median OS was 17.6 months (95% CI: 14.6–22.7) in the CAP-CRT arm and 14.6 months (95% CI: 11.1–16.0) in the GEM-CRT arm (intention-to-treat adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.68 (95% CI: 0.38–1.21, P=0.185)); median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 months (95% CI: 10.0–15.2) in the CAP-CRT arm and 10.4 months (95% CI: 8.8–12.7) in the GEM-CRT arm (intention-to-treat adjusted HR: 0.60 (95% CI: 0.32–1.14, P=0.120)). In baseline multivariable model, age ⩾65 years, better performance status, CA19.9<613 IU l(−1), and shorter tumour diameter predicted improved OS. CAP-CRT, age ⩾65 years, better performance status, CA19.9 <46 IU ml(−1) predicted improved OS and PFS in the pre-radiotherapy model. Nine-month PFS was highly predictive of OS. CONCLUSIONS: CAP-CRT remains the superior regimen. SCALOP showed that patients with CA19.9 <46 IU ml(−1) after induction chemotherapy are more likely to benefit from CRT. Nature Publishing Group 2017-05-09 2017-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5482737/ /pubmed/28376080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.95 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Hurt, C N
Falk, S
Crosby, T
McDonald, A
Ray, R
Joseph, G
Staffurth, J
Abrams, R A
Griffiths, G
Maughan, T
Mukherjee, S
Long-term results and recurrence patterns from SCALOP: a phase II randomised trial of gemcitabine- or capecitabine-based chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
title Long-term results and recurrence patterns from SCALOP: a phase II randomised trial of gemcitabine- or capecitabine-based chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
title_full Long-term results and recurrence patterns from SCALOP: a phase II randomised trial of gemcitabine- or capecitabine-based chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
title_fullStr Long-term results and recurrence patterns from SCALOP: a phase II randomised trial of gemcitabine- or capecitabine-based chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
title_full_unstemmed Long-term results and recurrence patterns from SCALOP: a phase II randomised trial of gemcitabine- or capecitabine-based chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
title_short Long-term results and recurrence patterns from SCALOP: a phase II randomised trial of gemcitabine- or capecitabine-based chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
title_sort long-term results and recurrence patterns from scalop: a phase ii randomised trial of gemcitabine- or capecitabine-based chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.95
work_keys_str_mv AT hurtcn longtermresultsandrecurrencepatternsfromscalopaphaseiirandomisedtrialofgemcitabineorcapecitabinebasedchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT falks longtermresultsandrecurrencepatternsfromscalopaphaseiirandomisedtrialofgemcitabineorcapecitabinebasedchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT crosbyt longtermresultsandrecurrencepatternsfromscalopaphaseiirandomisedtrialofgemcitabineorcapecitabinebasedchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT mcdonalda longtermresultsandrecurrencepatternsfromscalopaphaseiirandomisedtrialofgemcitabineorcapecitabinebasedchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT rayr longtermresultsandrecurrencepatternsfromscalopaphaseiirandomisedtrialofgemcitabineorcapecitabinebasedchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT josephg longtermresultsandrecurrencepatternsfromscalopaphaseiirandomisedtrialofgemcitabineorcapecitabinebasedchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT staffurthj longtermresultsandrecurrencepatternsfromscalopaphaseiirandomisedtrialofgemcitabineorcapecitabinebasedchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT abramsra longtermresultsandrecurrencepatternsfromscalopaphaseiirandomisedtrialofgemcitabineorcapecitabinebasedchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT griffithsg longtermresultsandrecurrencepatternsfromscalopaphaseiirandomisedtrialofgemcitabineorcapecitabinebasedchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT maughant longtermresultsandrecurrencepatternsfromscalopaphaseiirandomisedtrialofgemcitabineorcapecitabinebasedchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT mukherjees longtermresultsandrecurrencepatternsfromscalopaphaseiirandomisedtrialofgemcitabineorcapecitabinebasedchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer