Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of simultaneous colorectal ESD for large synchronous colorectal lesions
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS : Multiple large colorectal lesions are sometimes diagnosed during colonoscopy. However, there have been no investigations of the feasibility of simultaneous endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for multiple lesions. This study aims to reveal the strategy of simultaneous...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28670616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-110567 |
_version_ | 1783245624466997248 |
---|---|
author | Chiba, Hideyuki Tachikawa, Jun Kurihara, Daisuke Ashikari, Keiichi Goto, Toru Takahashi, Akihiro Sakai, Eiji Ohata, Ken Nakajima, Atsushi |
author_facet | Chiba, Hideyuki Tachikawa, Jun Kurihara, Daisuke Ashikari, Keiichi Goto, Toru Takahashi, Akihiro Sakai, Eiji Ohata, Ken Nakajima, Atsushi |
author_sort | Chiba, Hideyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS : Multiple large colorectal lesions are sometimes diagnosed during colonoscopy. However, there have been no investigations of the feasibility of simultaneous endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for multiple lesions. This study aims to reveal the strategy of simultaneous ESD for multiple large colorectal lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS : 246 patients who underwent ESD for 274 colorectal lesions were retrospectively evaluated in this study. Fifty-one large colorectal lesions among 23 patients were treated by ESD simultaneously (simultaneous group), and 223 patients were treated with ESD for a single lesion (single group). RESULTS: En-bloc resection and curative resection rates did not differ. Compared with the single group, each procedure time was faster (31.8 ± 23.6 min vs. 45.8 ± 44.8, P = 0.002), but total procedure time was significantly longer in the simultaneous group (70.6 ± 33.4 vs. 45.8 ± 44.8 min, P = 0.01). Rates of adverse events including bleeding and perforation were not higher in the simultaneous group but the mean blood pressure, incidence of bradycardia and the amount of sedative drug used during ESD were significantly higher in the simultaneous group. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified non-experienced physician, lesion size ≥ 40 mm and submucosal fibrosis as an independent risk factor for procedure duration (≥ 90 min) (Odds ratio 11.852, 18.280, and 3.672; P < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous ESD for multiple synchronous colorectal lesions is safe and feasible compared with single ESD and can reduce the burden to patients, length of hospital stay and medical expense. These results need to be elucidated by further studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5482740 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54827402017-07-01 Safety and efficacy of simultaneous colorectal ESD for large synchronous colorectal lesions Chiba, Hideyuki Tachikawa, Jun Kurihara, Daisuke Ashikari, Keiichi Goto, Toru Takahashi, Akihiro Sakai, Eiji Ohata, Ken Nakajima, Atsushi Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS : Multiple large colorectal lesions are sometimes diagnosed during colonoscopy. However, there have been no investigations of the feasibility of simultaneous endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for multiple lesions. This study aims to reveal the strategy of simultaneous ESD for multiple large colorectal lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS : 246 patients who underwent ESD for 274 colorectal lesions were retrospectively evaluated in this study. Fifty-one large colorectal lesions among 23 patients were treated by ESD simultaneously (simultaneous group), and 223 patients were treated with ESD for a single lesion (single group). RESULTS: En-bloc resection and curative resection rates did not differ. Compared with the single group, each procedure time was faster (31.8 ± 23.6 min vs. 45.8 ± 44.8, P = 0.002), but total procedure time was significantly longer in the simultaneous group (70.6 ± 33.4 vs. 45.8 ± 44.8 min, P = 0.01). Rates of adverse events including bleeding and perforation were not higher in the simultaneous group but the mean blood pressure, incidence of bradycardia and the amount of sedative drug used during ESD were significantly higher in the simultaneous group. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified non-experienced physician, lesion size ≥ 40 mm and submucosal fibrosis as an independent risk factor for procedure duration (≥ 90 min) (Odds ratio 11.852, 18.280, and 3.672; P < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous ESD for multiple synchronous colorectal lesions is safe and feasible compared with single ESD and can reduce the burden to patients, length of hospital stay and medical expense. These results need to be elucidated by further studies. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-07 2017-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5482740/ /pubmed/28670616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-110567 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Chiba, Hideyuki Tachikawa, Jun Kurihara, Daisuke Ashikari, Keiichi Goto, Toru Takahashi, Akihiro Sakai, Eiji Ohata, Ken Nakajima, Atsushi Safety and efficacy of simultaneous colorectal ESD for large synchronous colorectal lesions |
title | Safety and efficacy of simultaneous colorectal ESD for large synchronous colorectal lesions |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of simultaneous colorectal ESD for large synchronous colorectal lesions |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of simultaneous colorectal ESD for large synchronous colorectal lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of simultaneous colorectal ESD for large synchronous colorectal lesions |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of simultaneous colorectal ESD for large synchronous colorectal lesions |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of simultaneous colorectal esd for large synchronous colorectal lesions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28670616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-110567 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chibahideyuki safetyandefficacyofsimultaneouscolorectalesdforlargesynchronouscolorectallesions AT tachikawajun safetyandefficacyofsimultaneouscolorectalesdforlargesynchronouscolorectallesions AT kuriharadaisuke safetyandefficacyofsimultaneouscolorectalesdforlargesynchronouscolorectallesions AT ashikarikeiichi safetyandefficacyofsimultaneouscolorectalesdforlargesynchronouscolorectallesions AT gototoru safetyandefficacyofsimultaneouscolorectalesdforlargesynchronouscolorectallesions AT takahashiakihiro safetyandefficacyofsimultaneouscolorectalesdforlargesynchronouscolorectallesions AT sakaieiji safetyandefficacyofsimultaneouscolorectalesdforlargesynchronouscolorectallesions AT ohataken safetyandefficacyofsimultaneouscolorectalesdforlargesynchronouscolorectallesions AT nakajimaatsushi safetyandefficacyofsimultaneouscolorectalesdforlargesynchronouscolorectallesions |