Cargando…

Does the presence of a trainee compromise success of biliary cannulation at ERCP?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Findings in the literature are conflicting on whether trainee involvement in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures is detrimental to cannulation success rates. We addressed this in a prospective study, where cannulation success with or without t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frost, John Warwick, Kurup, Arun, Shetty, Sharan, Fisher, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28670611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-105579
_version_ 1783245624701878272
author Frost, John Warwick
Kurup, Arun
Shetty, Sharan
Fisher, Neil
author_facet Frost, John Warwick
Kurup, Arun
Shetty, Sharan
Fisher, Neil
author_sort Frost, John Warwick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Findings in the literature are conflicting on whether trainee involvement in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures is detrimental to cannulation success rates. We addressed this in a prospective study, where cannulation success with or without trainee presence was the primary outcome measure. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  We prospectively recorded data on 2 senior endoscopists and their trainees over an 18-month period for ERCPs in patients with a virgin ampulla. Presence or absence of a trainee at ERCP procedures was pragmatic, reflecting their other service or training commitments or annual leave. For trainee presence, the training protocol allowed them 6 minutes of supervised time in which to achieve biliary cannulation after reaching the ampulla. Study outcome measures included cannulation success, time to cannulation, technique, whether this was achieved independently by the trainee, and complications. RESULTS:  There were 219 procedures recorded and analyzed (134 with a trainee, 85 without). Three trainees were involved. Selective biliary cannulation was achieved in 201 (92 %) of cases. When a trainee was present, cannulation was successful in 122/134 procedures (91 %), compared to 79/85 (93 %) with a senior endoscopist alone ( P  = 0.8, Fisher’s exact test). Mean time to biliary cannulation with a trainee present was 7 minutes, compared with 5 minutes with no trainee. Mean time for successful independent cannulation by the trainee was 4 minutes, and 9 minutes for a consultant following a trainee’s attempt. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION:  Our study shows that with this training protocol, involvement of a trainee on a routine secondary care ERCP list does not impair biliary cannulation success, and does not prolong a subsequent attempt by the senior endoscopist if initially unsuccessful. These findings support the involvement of trainees in routine ERCP lists with this training protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5482741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54827412017-07-01 Does the presence of a trainee compromise success of biliary cannulation at ERCP? Frost, John Warwick Kurup, Arun Shetty, Sharan Fisher, Neil Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Findings in the literature are conflicting on whether trainee involvement in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures is detrimental to cannulation success rates. We addressed this in a prospective study, where cannulation success with or without trainee presence was the primary outcome measure. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  We prospectively recorded data on 2 senior endoscopists and their trainees over an 18-month period for ERCPs in patients with a virgin ampulla. Presence or absence of a trainee at ERCP procedures was pragmatic, reflecting their other service or training commitments or annual leave. For trainee presence, the training protocol allowed them 6 minutes of supervised time in which to achieve biliary cannulation after reaching the ampulla. Study outcome measures included cannulation success, time to cannulation, technique, whether this was achieved independently by the trainee, and complications. RESULTS:  There were 219 procedures recorded and analyzed (134 with a trainee, 85 without). Three trainees were involved. Selective biliary cannulation was achieved in 201 (92 %) of cases. When a trainee was present, cannulation was successful in 122/134 procedures (91 %), compared to 79/85 (93 %) with a senior endoscopist alone ( P  = 0.8, Fisher’s exact test). Mean time to biliary cannulation with a trainee present was 7 minutes, compared with 5 minutes with no trainee. Mean time for successful independent cannulation by the trainee was 4 minutes, and 9 minutes for a consultant following a trainee’s attempt. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION:  Our study shows that with this training protocol, involvement of a trainee on a routine secondary care ERCP list does not impair biliary cannulation success, and does not prolong a subsequent attempt by the senior endoscopist if initially unsuccessful. These findings support the involvement of trainees in routine ERCP lists with this training protocol. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-07 2017-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5482741/ /pubmed/28670611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-105579 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Frost, John Warwick
Kurup, Arun
Shetty, Sharan
Fisher, Neil
Does the presence of a trainee compromise success of biliary cannulation at ERCP?
title Does the presence of a trainee compromise success of biliary cannulation at ERCP?
title_full Does the presence of a trainee compromise success of biliary cannulation at ERCP?
title_fullStr Does the presence of a trainee compromise success of biliary cannulation at ERCP?
title_full_unstemmed Does the presence of a trainee compromise success of biliary cannulation at ERCP?
title_short Does the presence of a trainee compromise success of biliary cannulation at ERCP?
title_sort does the presence of a trainee compromise success of biliary cannulation at ercp?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28670611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-105579
work_keys_str_mv AT frostjohnwarwick doesthepresenceofatraineecompromisesuccessofbiliarycannulationatercp
AT kuruparun doesthepresenceofatraineecompromisesuccessofbiliarycannulationatercp
AT shettysharan doesthepresenceofatraineecompromisesuccessofbiliarycannulationatercp
AT fisherneil doesthepresenceofatraineecompromisesuccessofbiliarycannulationatercp