Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of cold snare resection in preventive screening colonoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIM:  Removal of polyps during colonoscopy effectively prevents the development of colorectal cancer. So far, snare resection with high frequency current with or without prior submucosal saline injection is the method of choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schett, B., Wallner, J., Weingart, V., Ayvaz, A., Richter, U., Stahl, J., Allescher, H.-D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28670614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-105491
_version_ 1783245625901449216
author Schett, B.
Wallner, J.
Weingart, V.
Ayvaz, A.
Richter, U.
Stahl, J.
Allescher, H.-D.
author_facet Schett, B.
Wallner, J.
Weingart, V.
Ayvaz, A.
Richter, U.
Stahl, J.
Allescher, H.-D.
author_sort Schett, B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM:  Removal of polyps during colonoscopy effectively prevents the development of colorectal cancer. So far, snare resection with high frequency current with or without prior submucosal saline injection is the method of choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcome of cold snare resection during routine endoscopy. METHODS:  In this prospective study, 522 patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were included. Cold snare resection for diminutive (< 6 mm), small (6 – 9 mm), and larger polyps (> 9 – 15 mm) was performed using a dedicated cold snare device (Exacto (®) ) without prior submucosal injection. Outcome parameters included bleeding rate, perforation rate, procedure time, histologic evaluation of polyp margins, and success rates. The data were compared to a group of patients undergoing hot snare resection. RESULTS:  Overall, 1233 polyps were removed using cold snare resection with an overall success rate of 99.4 %. All failures of cold snare resection occurred in the cecum (8/82, failure rate 9.8 %). In the remaining colon, the success rate was 100 %. Immediate post-polypectomy bleeding occurred in 0.49 % of all patients and was most frequently seen in polyps larger than 9 mm. The procedure time was significantly shorter using cold snare resection compared with hot snare resection (27.6 min vs. 35.7 min, P  < 0.01). CONCLUSION:  Cold snare resection can be performed safely in outpatients for removal of small polyps in screening colonoscopy. It does not require prior saline injection and reduces procedure time without an increased risk of bleeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5482746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54827462017-07-01 Efficacy and safety of cold snare resection in preventive screening colonoscopy Schett, B. Wallner, J. Weingart, V. Ayvaz, A. Richter, U. Stahl, J. Allescher, H.-D. Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND AIM:  Removal of polyps during colonoscopy effectively prevents the development of colorectal cancer. So far, snare resection with high frequency current with or without prior submucosal saline injection is the method of choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcome of cold snare resection during routine endoscopy. METHODS:  In this prospective study, 522 patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were included. Cold snare resection for diminutive (< 6 mm), small (6 – 9 mm), and larger polyps (> 9 – 15 mm) was performed using a dedicated cold snare device (Exacto (®) ) without prior submucosal injection. Outcome parameters included bleeding rate, perforation rate, procedure time, histologic evaluation of polyp margins, and success rates. The data were compared to a group of patients undergoing hot snare resection. RESULTS:  Overall, 1233 polyps were removed using cold snare resection with an overall success rate of 99.4 %. All failures of cold snare resection occurred in the cecum (8/82, failure rate 9.8 %). In the remaining colon, the success rate was 100 %. Immediate post-polypectomy bleeding occurred in 0.49 % of all patients and was most frequently seen in polyps larger than 9 mm. The procedure time was significantly shorter using cold snare resection compared with hot snare resection (27.6 min vs. 35.7 min, P  < 0.01). CONCLUSION:  Cold snare resection can be performed safely in outpatients for removal of small polyps in screening colonoscopy. It does not require prior saline injection and reduces procedure time without an increased risk of bleeding. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-07 2017-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5482746/ /pubmed/28670614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-105491 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Schett, B.
Wallner, J.
Weingart, V.
Ayvaz, A.
Richter, U.
Stahl, J.
Allescher, H.-D.
Efficacy and safety of cold snare resection in preventive screening colonoscopy
title Efficacy and safety of cold snare resection in preventive screening colonoscopy
title_full Efficacy and safety of cold snare resection in preventive screening colonoscopy
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of cold snare resection in preventive screening colonoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of cold snare resection in preventive screening colonoscopy
title_short Efficacy and safety of cold snare resection in preventive screening colonoscopy
title_sort efficacy and safety of cold snare resection in preventive screening colonoscopy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28670614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-105491
work_keys_str_mv AT schettb efficacyandsafetyofcoldsnareresectioninpreventivescreeningcolonoscopy
AT wallnerj efficacyandsafetyofcoldsnareresectioninpreventivescreeningcolonoscopy
AT weingartv efficacyandsafetyofcoldsnareresectioninpreventivescreeningcolonoscopy
AT ayvaza efficacyandsafetyofcoldsnareresectioninpreventivescreeningcolonoscopy
AT richteru efficacyandsafetyofcoldsnareresectioninpreventivescreeningcolonoscopy
AT stahlj efficacyandsafetyofcoldsnareresectioninpreventivescreeningcolonoscopy
AT allescherhd efficacyandsafetyofcoldsnareresectioninpreventivescreeningcolonoscopy