Cargando…

Why do physicians lack engagement with smoking cessation treatment in their COPD patients? A multinational qualitative study

Smoking cessation is the only effective intervention to slow down the accelerated decline in lung function in smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nevertheless, physicians often do not routinely provide evidence-based smoking cessation treatment to their patients. To understand underl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Eerd, Eva Anne Marije, Bech Risør, Mette, Spigt, Mark, Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek, Andreeva, Elena, Francis, Nick, Wollny, Anja, Melbye, Hasse, van Schayck, Onno, Kotz, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28646217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-017-0038-6
_version_ 1783245651121799168
author van Eerd, Eva Anne Marije
Bech Risør, Mette
Spigt, Mark
Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
Andreeva, Elena
Francis, Nick
Wollny, Anja
Melbye, Hasse
van Schayck, Onno
Kotz, Daniel
author_facet van Eerd, Eva Anne Marije
Bech Risør, Mette
Spigt, Mark
Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
Andreeva, Elena
Francis, Nick
Wollny, Anja
Melbye, Hasse
van Schayck, Onno
Kotz, Daniel
author_sort van Eerd, Eva Anne Marije
collection PubMed
description Smoking cessation is the only effective intervention to slow down the accelerated decline in lung function in smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nevertheless, physicians often do not routinely provide evidence-based smoking cessation treatment to their patients. To understand underlying reasons, we explored how physicians engage in smoking cessation treatment in their chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. In total, 21 focus group discussions were held with general practitioners and pulmonologists in seven different countries in Europe and Asia. We generated three themes, whereby some of the issues concerned smokers in general: first, ‘physicians’ frustration with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients who smoke’. These frustrations interfered with the provision of evidence-based treatment and could result in this group of patients being treated unequally. Second: ‘physicians’ limited knowledge of, and negative beliefs about, smoking cessation treatment’. This hindered treating smokers effectively. Third: ‘healthcare organisational factors that influence the use of smoking cessation treatments’. Money and time issues, as well as the failure to regard smoking as a disease, influenced how physicians engaged in smoking cessation treatment. Our results indicate that there is a number of barriers to the provision of effective smoking cessation treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and smokers in general. Introducing an informative smoking cessation programme, including communication skills and ethical issues, in the vocational and postgraduate medical training may help to address these barriers. This is important in order to increase engagement with smoking cessation treatment and to improve quality of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5482893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54828932017-07-05 Why do physicians lack engagement with smoking cessation treatment in their COPD patients? A multinational qualitative study van Eerd, Eva Anne Marije Bech Risør, Mette Spigt, Mark Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek Andreeva, Elena Francis, Nick Wollny, Anja Melbye, Hasse van Schayck, Onno Kotz, Daniel NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Article Smoking cessation is the only effective intervention to slow down the accelerated decline in lung function in smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nevertheless, physicians often do not routinely provide evidence-based smoking cessation treatment to their patients. To understand underlying reasons, we explored how physicians engage in smoking cessation treatment in their chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. In total, 21 focus group discussions were held with general practitioners and pulmonologists in seven different countries in Europe and Asia. We generated three themes, whereby some of the issues concerned smokers in general: first, ‘physicians’ frustration with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients who smoke’. These frustrations interfered with the provision of evidence-based treatment and could result in this group of patients being treated unequally. Second: ‘physicians’ limited knowledge of, and negative beliefs about, smoking cessation treatment’. This hindered treating smokers effectively. Third: ‘healthcare organisational factors that influence the use of smoking cessation treatments’. Money and time issues, as well as the failure to regard smoking as a disease, influenced how physicians engaged in smoking cessation treatment. Our results indicate that there is a number of barriers to the provision of effective smoking cessation treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and smokers in general. Introducing an informative smoking cessation programme, including communication skills and ethical issues, in the vocational and postgraduate medical training may help to address these barriers. This is important in order to increase engagement with smoking cessation treatment and to improve quality of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5482893/ /pubmed/28646217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-017-0038-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
van Eerd, Eva Anne Marije
Bech Risør, Mette
Spigt, Mark
Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
Andreeva, Elena
Francis, Nick
Wollny, Anja
Melbye, Hasse
van Schayck, Onno
Kotz, Daniel
Why do physicians lack engagement with smoking cessation treatment in their COPD patients? A multinational qualitative study
title Why do physicians lack engagement with smoking cessation treatment in their COPD patients? A multinational qualitative study
title_full Why do physicians lack engagement with smoking cessation treatment in their COPD patients? A multinational qualitative study
title_fullStr Why do physicians lack engagement with smoking cessation treatment in their COPD patients? A multinational qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Why do physicians lack engagement with smoking cessation treatment in their COPD patients? A multinational qualitative study
title_short Why do physicians lack engagement with smoking cessation treatment in their COPD patients? A multinational qualitative study
title_sort why do physicians lack engagement with smoking cessation treatment in their copd patients? a multinational qualitative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28646217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-017-0038-6
work_keys_str_mv AT vaneerdevaannemarije whydophysicianslackengagementwithsmokingcessationtreatmentintheircopdpatientsamultinationalqualitativestudy
AT bechrisørmette whydophysicianslackengagementwithsmokingcessationtreatmentintheircopdpatientsamultinationalqualitativestudy
AT spigtmark whydophysicianslackengagementwithsmokingcessationtreatmentintheircopdpatientsamultinationalqualitativestudy
AT godyckicwirkomaciek whydophysicianslackengagementwithsmokingcessationtreatmentintheircopdpatientsamultinationalqualitativestudy
AT andreevaelena whydophysicianslackengagementwithsmokingcessationtreatmentintheircopdpatientsamultinationalqualitativestudy
AT francisnick whydophysicianslackengagementwithsmokingcessationtreatmentintheircopdpatientsamultinationalqualitativestudy
AT wollnyanja whydophysicianslackengagementwithsmokingcessationtreatmentintheircopdpatientsamultinationalqualitativestudy
AT melbyehasse whydophysicianslackengagementwithsmokingcessationtreatmentintheircopdpatientsamultinationalqualitativestudy
AT vanschayckonno whydophysicianslackengagementwithsmokingcessationtreatmentintheircopdpatientsamultinationalqualitativestudy
AT kotzdaniel whydophysicianslackengagementwithsmokingcessationtreatmentintheircopdpatientsamultinationalqualitativestudy