Cargando…
The myths surrounding mild stimulation in vitro fertilization (IVF)
So-called mild controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (mCOH) has in recent years increased in popularity, claiming to be safer and more patient-friendly, while also improving in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. We here challenge the International Society for Mild Approaches in Assisted Reproduction...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28645286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-017-0266-1 |
_version_ | 1783245665119240192 |
---|---|
author | Orvieto, Raoul Vanni, Valeria Stella Gleicher, Norbert |
author_facet | Orvieto, Raoul Vanni, Valeria Stella Gleicher, Norbert |
author_sort | Orvieto, Raoul |
collection | PubMed |
description | So-called mild controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (mCOH) has in recent years increased in popularity, claiming to be safer and more patient-friendly, while also improving in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. We here challenge the International Society for Mild Approaches in Assisted Reproduction (ISMAAR) definition of mild stimulation, and especially address four fundamental issues, where our review found conventional COH (cCOH) advantageous over mCOH. They are: prevalence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), oocyte/embryo quality, pregnancy/live birth rates, and cost. We conclude that an objective review of the literature does not support the routine utilization of mCOH in assisted reproduction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5482955 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54829552017-06-26 The myths surrounding mild stimulation in vitro fertilization (IVF) Orvieto, Raoul Vanni, Valeria Stella Gleicher, Norbert Reprod Biol Endocrinol Review So-called mild controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (mCOH) has in recent years increased in popularity, claiming to be safer and more patient-friendly, while also improving in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. We here challenge the International Society for Mild Approaches in Assisted Reproduction (ISMAAR) definition of mild stimulation, and especially address four fundamental issues, where our review found conventional COH (cCOH) advantageous over mCOH. They are: prevalence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), oocyte/embryo quality, pregnancy/live birth rates, and cost. We conclude that an objective review of the literature does not support the routine utilization of mCOH in assisted reproduction. BioMed Central 2017-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5482955/ /pubmed/28645286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-017-0266-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Orvieto, Raoul Vanni, Valeria Stella Gleicher, Norbert The myths surrounding mild stimulation in vitro fertilization (IVF) |
title | The myths surrounding mild stimulation in vitro fertilization (IVF) |
title_full | The myths surrounding mild stimulation in vitro fertilization (IVF) |
title_fullStr | The myths surrounding mild stimulation in vitro fertilization (IVF) |
title_full_unstemmed | The myths surrounding mild stimulation in vitro fertilization (IVF) |
title_short | The myths surrounding mild stimulation in vitro fertilization (IVF) |
title_sort | myths surrounding mild stimulation in vitro fertilization (ivf) |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28645286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-017-0266-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orvietoraoul themythssurroundingmildstimulationinvitrofertilizationivf AT vannivaleriastella themythssurroundingmildstimulationinvitrofertilizationivf AT gleichernorbert themythssurroundingmildstimulationinvitrofertilizationivf AT orvietoraoul mythssurroundingmildstimulationinvitrofertilizationivf AT vannivaleriastella mythssurroundingmildstimulationinvitrofertilizationivf AT gleichernorbert mythssurroundingmildstimulationinvitrofertilizationivf |