Cargando…

Ciprofloxacin for contacts of cases of meningococcal meningitis as an epidemic response: study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Epidemics of meningococcal meningitis are common in the “African meningitis belt.” Current response strategies include reactive vaccination campaigns, which are often organized too late to have maximal impact. A novel strain of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C has been circulating in r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coldiron, Matthew E., Alcoba, Gabriel, Ciglenecki, Iza, Hitchings, Matt, Djibo, Ali, Page, Anne-Laure, Langendorf, Celine, Grais, Rebecca F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28646924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2028-y
_version_ 1783245665362509824
author Coldiron, Matthew E.
Alcoba, Gabriel
Ciglenecki, Iza
Hitchings, Matt
Djibo, Ali
Page, Anne-Laure
Langendorf, Celine
Grais, Rebecca F.
author_facet Coldiron, Matthew E.
Alcoba, Gabriel
Ciglenecki, Iza
Hitchings, Matt
Djibo, Ali
Page, Anne-Laure
Langendorf, Celine
Grais, Rebecca F.
author_sort Coldiron, Matthew E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epidemics of meningococcal meningitis are common in the “African meningitis belt.” Current response strategies include reactive vaccination campaigns, which are often organized too late to have maximal impact. A novel strain of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C has been circulating in recent years, and vaccine supplies are limited. An evaluation of chemoprophylaxis with single-dose ciprofloxacin for household contacts of meningitis cases has therefore been recommended. METHODS/DESIGN: A three-arm cluster-randomized trial has been designed for implementation during a meningococcal meningitis epidemic in a health district in Niger in which at least two Health Zones (HZs) have met the weekly epidemic threshold. The primary outcome is the incidence (attack rate) of meningitis during the epidemic. Villages will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three different arms: standard care, household-level prophylaxis, or village-wide prophylaxis. After study launch, when a case of meningococcal meningitis is identified in an HZ, the first reported case from a village will trigger the inclusion and randomization of the village. Household-level prophylaxis with single-dose ciprofloxacin will be offered in the home to all household members within 24 hours of the notification of the case, and village-wide distributions will occur within 72 hours of the notification of the case. The sample size necessary to detect differences between each of the two intervention arms and the standard care arm will be set after 4 weeks of data collection, in order to quantify multiple variables that could be particular to a given area. The primary analysis will compare attack rates at the end of the epidemic in each of the three arms. A nested sub-study will assess the effects of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis on the prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant enterobacteriaceae. A total of 200 participants in the standard care arm and 200 in the village-wide prophylaxis arm will provide stool samples at days 0, 7, and 28 following their village’s inclusion in the study. DISCUSSION: An innovative trial is proposed for implementation during an epidemic that will assess the impact of a novel strategy for meningitis outbreak response. In parallel, we will describe potential negative effects of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02724046. Registered on 15 March 2016. Last updated on 13 June 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2028-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5482956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54829562017-06-26 Ciprofloxacin for contacts of cases of meningococcal meningitis as an epidemic response: study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial Coldiron, Matthew E. Alcoba, Gabriel Ciglenecki, Iza Hitchings, Matt Djibo, Ali Page, Anne-Laure Langendorf, Celine Grais, Rebecca F. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Epidemics of meningococcal meningitis are common in the “African meningitis belt.” Current response strategies include reactive vaccination campaigns, which are often organized too late to have maximal impact. A novel strain of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C has been circulating in recent years, and vaccine supplies are limited. An evaluation of chemoprophylaxis with single-dose ciprofloxacin for household contacts of meningitis cases has therefore been recommended. METHODS/DESIGN: A three-arm cluster-randomized trial has been designed for implementation during a meningococcal meningitis epidemic in a health district in Niger in which at least two Health Zones (HZs) have met the weekly epidemic threshold. The primary outcome is the incidence (attack rate) of meningitis during the epidemic. Villages will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three different arms: standard care, household-level prophylaxis, or village-wide prophylaxis. After study launch, when a case of meningococcal meningitis is identified in an HZ, the first reported case from a village will trigger the inclusion and randomization of the village. Household-level prophylaxis with single-dose ciprofloxacin will be offered in the home to all household members within 24 hours of the notification of the case, and village-wide distributions will occur within 72 hours of the notification of the case. The sample size necessary to detect differences between each of the two intervention arms and the standard care arm will be set after 4 weeks of data collection, in order to quantify multiple variables that could be particular to a given area. The primary analysis will compare attack rates at the end of the epidemic in each of the three arms. A nested sub-study will assess the effects of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis on the prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant enterobacteriaceae. A total of 200 participants in the standard care arm and 200 in the village-wide prophylaxis arm will provide stool samples at days 0, 7, and 28 following their village’s inclusion in the study. DISCUSSION: An innovative trial is proposed for implementation during an epidemic that will assess the impact of a novel strategy for meningitis outbreak response. In parallel, we will describe potential negative effects of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02724046. Registered on 15 March 2016. Last updated on 13 June 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2028-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5482956/ /pubmed/28646924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2028-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Coldiron, Matthew E.
Alcoba, Gabriel
Ciglenecki, Iza
Hitchings, Matt
Djibo, Ali
Page, Anne-Laure
Langendorf, Celine
Grais, Rebecca F.
Ciprofloxacin for contacts of cases of meningococcal meningitis as an epidemic response: study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial
title Ciprofloxacin for contacts of cases of meningococcal meningitis as an epidemic response: study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial
title_full Ciprofloxacin for contacts of cases of meningococcal meningitis as an epidemic response: study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial
title_fullStr Ciprofloxacin for contacts of cases of meningococcal meningitis as an epidemic response: study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Ciprofloxacin for contacts of cases of meningococcal meningitis as an epidemic response: study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial
title_short Ciprofloxacin for contacts of cases of meningococcal meningitis as an epidemic response: study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial
title_sort ciprofloxacin for contacts of cases of meningococcal meningitis as an epidemic response: study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28646924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2028-y
work_keys_str_mv AT coldironmatthewe ciprofloxacinforcontactsofcasesofmeningococcalmeningitisasanepidemicresponsestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT alcobagabriel ciprofloxacinforcontactsofcasesofmeningococcalmeningitisasanepidemicresponsestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT cigleneckiiza ciprofloxacinforcontactsofcasesofmeningococcalmeningitisasanepidemicresponsestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT hitchingsmatt ciprofloxacinforcontactsofcasesofmeningococcalmeningitisasanepidemicresponsestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT djiboali ciprofloxacinforcontactsofcasesofmeningococcalmeningitisasanepidemicresponsestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT pageannelaure ciprofloxacinforcontactsofcasesofmeningococcalmeningitisasanepidemicresponsestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT langendorfceline ciprofloxacinforcontactsofcasesofmeningococcalmeningitisasanepidemicresponsestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT graisrebeccaf ciprofloxacinforcontactsofcasesofmeningococcalmeningitisasanepidemicresponsestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedtrial