Cargando…
Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: In patients with one to three brain metastases who undergo resection, options for post-operative treatments include whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of the resection cavity. In this meta-analysis, we sought to compare the efficacy of each post-operative...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5483276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28646895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0840-x |
_version_ | 1783245728226738176 |
---|---|
author | Lamba, Nayan Muskens, Ivo S. DiRisio, Aislyn C. Meijer, Louise Briceno, Vanessa Edrees, Heba Aslam, Bilal Minhas, Sadia Verhoeff, Joost J. C. Kleynen, Catharina E. Smith, Timothy R. Mekary, Rania A. Broekman, Marike L. |
author_facet | Lamba, Nayan Muskens, Ivo S. DiRisio, Aislyn C. Meijer, Louise Briceno, Vanessa Edrees, Heba Aslam, Bilal Minhas, Sadia Verhoeff, Joost J. C. Kleynen, Catharina E. Smith, Timothy R. Mekary, Rania A. Broekman, Marike L. |
author_sort | Lamba, Nayan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In patients with one to three brain metastases who undergo resection, options for post-operative treatments include whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of the resection cavity. In this meta-analysis, we sought to compare the efficacy of each post-operative radiation modality with respect to tumor recurrence and survival. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched through June 2016 for cohort studies reporting outcomes of SRS or WBRT after metastasis resection. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using fixed-effect and random-effect models for local recurrence, distant recurrence, and overall survival. RESULTS: Eight retrospective cohort studies with 646 patients (238 with SRS versus 408 with WBRT) were included in the analysis. Comparing SRS to WBRT, the overall crude risk ratio using the fixed-effect model was 0.59 for local recurrence (95%-CI: 0.32–1.09, I(2): 3.35%, P-heterogeneity = 0.36, 3 studies), 1.09 for distant recurrence (95%-CI: 0.74–1.60, I(2): 50.5%, P-heterogeneity = 0.13; 3 studies), and 2.99 for leptomeningeal disease (95% CI 1.55–5.76; I(2): 14.4% p-heterogeneity: 0.28; 2 studies). For the same comparison, the risk ratio for median overall survival was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.41–0.54; I(2): 79.1%, P-heterogeneity < 0.01; 4 studies) in a fixed-effect model, but was no longer significant (0.63; 95%-CI: 0.40–1.00) in a random-effect model. SRS was associated with a lower risk of leukoencephalopathy (RR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07–0.33, 1 study), yet with a higher risk of radiation-necrosis (RR: 19.4, 95% CI: 1.21–310, 1 study). CONCLUSION: Based on retrospective cohort studies, the results of this study suggest that SRS of the resection cavity may offer comparable survival and similar local and distant control as adjuvant WBRT, yet may be associated with a higher risk for developing leptomeningeal disease. Future research on SRS should focus on achieving a better understanding of the various factors that may favor SRS over WBRT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5483276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54832762017-06-26 Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lamba, Nayan Muskens, Ivo S. DiRisio, Aislyn C. Meijer, Louise Briceno, Vanessa Edrees, Heba Aslam, Bilal Minhas, Sadia Verhoeff, Joost J. C. Kleynen, Catharina E. Smith, Timothy R. Mekary, Rania A. Broekman, Marike L. Radiat Oncol Review BACKGROUND: In patients with one to three brain metastases who undergo resection, options for post-operative treatments include whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of the resection cavity. In this meta-analysis, we sought to compare the efficacy of each post-operative radiation modality with respect to tumor recurrence and survival. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched through June 2016 for cohort studies reporting outcomes of SRS or WBRT after metastasis resection. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using fixed-effect and random-effect models for local recurrence, distant recurrence, and overall survival. RESULTS: Eight retrospective cohort studies with 646 patients (238 with SRS versus 408 with WBRT) were included in the analysis. Comparing SRS to WBRT, the overall crude risk ratio using the fixed-effect model was 0.59 for local recurrence (95%-CI: 0.32–1.09, I(2): 3.35%, P-heterogeneity = 0.36, 3 studies), 1.09 for distant recurrence (95%-CI: 0.74–1.60, I(2): 50.5%, P-heterogeneity = 0.13; 3 studies), and 2.99 for leptomeningeal disease (95% CI 1.55–5.76; I(2): 14.4% p-heterogeneity: 0.28; 2 studies). For the same comparison, the risk ratio for median overall survival was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.41–0.54; I(2): 79.1%, P-heterogeneity < 0.01; 4 studies) in a fixed-effect model, but was no longer significant (0.63; 95%-CI: 0.40–1.00) in a random-effect model. SRS was associated with a lower risk of leukoencephalopathy (RR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07–0.33, 1 study), yet with a higher risk of radiation-necrosis (RR: 19.4, 95% CI: 1.21–310, 1 study). CONCLUSION: Based on retrospective cohort studies, the results of this study suggest that SRS of the resection cavity may offer comparable survival and similar local and distant control as adjuvant WBRT, yet may be associated with a higher risk for developing leptomeningeal disease. Future research on SRS should focus on achieving a better understanding of the various factors that may favor SRS over WBRT. BioMed Central 2017-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5483276/ /pubmed/28646895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0840-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Lamba, Nayan Muskens, Ivo S. DiRisio, Aislyn C. Meijer, Louise Briceno, Vanessa Edrees, Heba Aslam, Bilal Minhas, Sadia Verhoeff, Joost J. C. Kleynen, Catharina E. Smith, Timothy R. Mekary, Rania A. Broekman, Marike L. Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5483276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28646895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0840-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lambanayan stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT muskensivos stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dirisioaislync stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT meijerlouise stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bricenovanessa stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT edreesheba stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT aslambilal stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT minhassadia stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT verhoeffjoostjc stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kleynencatharinae stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT smithtimothyr stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mekaryraniaa stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT broekmanmarikel stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |