Cargando…

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: In patients with one to three brain metastases who undergo resection, options for post-operative treatments include whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of the resection cavity. In this meta-analysis, we sought to compare the efficacy of each post-operative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamba, Nayan, Muskens, Ivo S., DiRisio, Aislyn C., Meijer, Louise, Briceno, Vanessa, Edrees, Heba, Aslam, Bilal, Minhas, Sadia, Verhoeff, Joost J. C., Kleynen, Catharina E., Smith, Timothy R., Mekary, Rania A., Broekman, Marike L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5483276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28646895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0840-x
_version_ 1783245728226738176
author Lamba, Nayan
Muskens, Ivo S.
DiRisio, Aislyn C.
Meijer, Louise
Briceno, Vanessa
Edrees, Heba
Aslam, Bilal
Minhas, Sadia
Verhoeff, Joost J. C.
Kleynen, Catharina E.
Smith, Timothy R.
Mekary, Rania A.
Broekman, Marike L.
author_facet Lamba, Nayan
Muskens, Ivo S.
DiRisio, Aislyn C.
Meijer, Louise
Briceno, Vanessa
Edrees, Heba
Aslam, Bilal
Minhas, Sadia
Verhoeff, Joost J. C.
Kleynen, Catharina E.
Smith, Timothy R.
Mekary, Rania A.
Broekman, Marike L.
author_sort Lamba, Nayan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In patients with one to three brain metastases who undergo resection, options for post-operative treatments include whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of the resection cavity. In this meta-analysis, we sought to compare the efficacy of each post-operative radiation modality with respect to tumor recurrence and survival. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched through June 2016 for cohort studies reporting outcomes of SRS or WBRT after metastasis resection. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using fixed-effect and random-effect models for local recurrence, distant recurrence, and overall survival. RESULTS: Eight retrospective cohort studies with 646 patients (238 with SRS versus 408 with WBRT) were included in the analysis. Comparing SRS to WBRT, the overall crude risk ratio using the fixed-effect model was 0.59 for local recurrence (95%-CI: 0.32–1.09, I(2): 3.35%, P-heterogeneity = 0.36, 3 studies), 1.09 for distant recurrence (95%-CI: 0.74–1.60, I(2): 50.5%, P-heterogeneity = 0.13; 3 studies), and 2.99 for leptomeningeal disease (95% CI 1.55–5.76; I(2): 14.4% p-heterogeneity: 0.28; 2 studies). For the same comparison, the risk ratio for median overall survival was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.41–0.54; I(2): 79.1%, P-heterogeneity < 0.01; 4 studies) in a fixed-effect model, but was no longer significant (0.63; 95%-CI: 0.40–1.00) in a random-effect model. SRS was associated with a lower risk of leukoencephalopathy (RR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07–0.33, 1 study), yet with a higher risk of radiation-necrosis (RR: 19.4, 95% CI: 1.21–310, 1 study). CONCLUSION: Based on retrospective cohort studies, the results of this study suggest that SRS of the resection cavity may offer comparable survival and similar local and distant control as adjuvant WBRT, yet may be associated with a higher risk for developing leptomeningeal disease. Future research on SRS should focus on achieving a better understanding of the various factors that may favor SRS over WBRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5483276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54832762017-06-26 Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lamba, Nayan Muskens, Ivo S. DiRisio, Aislyn C. Meijer, Louise Briceno, Vanessa Edrees, Heba Aslam, Bilal Minhas, Sadia Verhoeff, Joost J. C. Kleynen, Catharina E. Smith, Timothy R. Mekary, Rania A. Broekman, Marike L. Radiat Oncol Review BACKGROUND: In patients with one to three brain metastases who undergo resection, options for post-operative treatments include whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of the resection cavity. In this meta-analysis, we sought to compare the efficacy of each post-operative radiation modality with respect to tumor recurrence and survival. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched through June 2016 for cohort studies reporting outcomes of SRS or WBRT after metastasis resection. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using fixed-effect and random-effect models for local recurrence, distant recurrence, and overall survival. RESULTS: Eight retrospective cohort studies with 646 patients (238 with SRS versus 408 with WBRT) were included in the analysis. Comparing SRS to WBRT, the overall crude risk ratio using the fixed-effect model was 0.59 for local recurrence (95%-CI: 0.32–1.09, I(2): 3.35%, P-heterogeneity = 0.36, 3 studies), 1.09 for distant recurrence (95%-CI: 0.74–1.60, I(2): 50.5%, P-heterogeneity = 0.13; 3 studies), and 2.99 for leptomeningeal disease (95% CI 1.55–5.76; I(2): 14.4% p-heterogeneity: 0.28; 2 studies). For the same comparison, the risk ratio for median overall survival was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.41–0.54; I(2): 79.1%, P-heterogeneity < 0.01; 4 studies) in a fixed-effect model, but was no longer significant (0.63; 95%-CI: 0.40–1.00) in a random-effect model. SRS was associated with a lower risk of leukoencephalopathy (RR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07–0.33, 1 study), yet with a higher risk of radiation-necrosis (RR: 19.4, 95% CI: 1.21–310, 1 study). CONCLUSION: Based on retrospective cohort studies, the results of this study suggest that SRS of the resection cavity may offer comparable survival and similar local and distant control as adjuvant WBRT, yet may be associated with a higher risk for developing leptomeningeal disease. Future research on SRS should focus on achieving a better understanding of the various factors that may favor SRS over WBRT. BioMed Central 2017-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5483276/ /pubmed/28646895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0840-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Lamba, Nayan
Muskens, Ivo S.
DiRisio, Aislyn C.
Meijer, Louise
Briceno, Vanessa
Edrees, Heba
Aslam, Bilal
Minhas, Sadia
Verhoeff, Joost J. C.
Kleynen, Catharina E.
Smith, Timothy R.
Mekary, Rania A.
Broekman, Marike L.
Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after intracranial metastasis resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5483276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28646895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0840-x
work_keys_str_mv AT lambanayan stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT muskensivos stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dirisioaislync stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT meijerlouise stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bricenovanessa stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT edreesheba stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aslambilal stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT minhassadia stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT verhoeffjoostjc stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kleynencatharinae stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT smithtimothyr stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mekaryraniaa stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT broekmanmarikel stereotacticradiosurgeryversuswholebrainradiotherapyafterintracranialmetastasisresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis