Cargando…
Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length
PURPOSE: The design of the attachment must provide an optimum stress distribution around the implant. In this study, for implant overdentures with a bar/clip attachment or a locator attachment, the stress transmitted to the implant in accordance with the change in the denture base length and the ver...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5483399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680544 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.143 |
_version_ | 1783245748980154368 |
---|---|
author | Yoo, Jin Suk Kwon, Kung-Rock Noh, Kwantae Lee, Hyeonjong Paek, Janghyun |
author_facet | Yoo, Jin Suk Kwon, Kung-Rock Noh, Kwantae Lee, Hyeonjong Paek, Janghyun |
author_sort | Yoo, Jin Suk |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The design of the attachment must provide an optimum stress distribution around the implant. In this study, for implant overdentures with a bar/clip attachment or a locator attachment, the stress transmitted to the implant in accordance with the change in the denture base length and the vertical pressure was measured and analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Test model was created with epoxy resin. The strain gauges made a tight contact with implant surfaces. A universal testing machine was used to exert a vertical pressure on the mandibular implant overdenture and the strain rate of the implants was measured. RESULTS: Means and standard deviations of the maximum micro-deformation rates were determined. 1) Locator attachment: The implants on the working side generally showed higher strain than those on the non-working side. Tensile force was observed on the mesial surface of the implant on the working side, and the compressive force was applied to the buccal surface and on the surfaces of the implant on the non-working side. 2) Bar/clip attachment: The implants on the both non-working and working sides showed high strain; all surfaces except the mesial surface of the implant on the non-working side showed a compressive force. CONCLUSION: To minimize the strain on implants in mandibular implant overdentures, the attachment of the implant should be carefully selected and the denture base should be extended as much as possible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5483399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54833992017-07-05 Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length Yoo, Jin Suk Kwon, Kung-Rock Noh, Kwantae Lee, Hyeonjong Paek, Janghyun J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The design of the attachment must provide an optimum stress distribution around the implant. In this study, for implant overdentures with a bar/clip attachment or a locator attachment, the stress transmitted to the implant in accordance with the change in the denture base length and the vertical pressure was measured and analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Test model was created with epoxy resin. The strain gauges made a tight contact with implant surfaces. A universal testing machine was used to exert a vertical pressure on the mandibular implant overdenture and the strain rate of the implants was measured. RESULTS: Means and standard deviations of the maximum micro-deformation rates were determined. 1) Locator attachment: The implants on the working side generally showed higher strain than those on the non-working side. Tensile force was observed on the mesial surface of the implant on the working side, and the compressive force was applied to the buccal surface and on the surfaces of the implant on the non-working side. 2) Bar/clip attachment: The implants on the both non-working and working sides showed high strain; all surfaces except the mesial surface of the implant on the non-working side showed a compressive force. CONCLUSION: To minimize the strain on implants in mandibular implant overdentures, the attachment of the implant should be carefully selected and the denture base should be extended as much as possible. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2017-06 2017-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5483399/ /pubmed/28680544 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.143 Text en © 2017 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yoo, Jin Suk Kwon, Kung-Rock Noh, Kwantae Lee, Hyeonjong Paek, Janghyun Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length |
title | Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length |
title_full | Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length |
title_fullStr | Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length |
title_full_unstemmed | Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length |
title_short | Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length |
title_sort | stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: comparative study with differences in the denture base length |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5483399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680544 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.143 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoojinsuk stressanalysisofmandibularimplantoverdenturewithlocatorandbarclipattachmentcomparativestudywithdifferencesinthedenturebaselength AT kwonkungrock stressanalysisofmandibularimplantoverdenturewithlocatorandbarclipattachmentcomparativestudywithdifferencesinthedenturebaselength AT nohkwantae stressanalysisofmandibularimplantoverdenturewithlocatorandbarclipattachmentcomparativestudywithdifferencesinthedenturebaselength AT leehyeonjong stressanalysisofmandibularimplantoverdenturewithlocatorandbarclipattachmentcomparativestudywithdifferencesinthedenturebaselength AT paekjanghyun stressanalysisofmandibularimplantoverdenturewithlocatorandbarclipattachmentcomparativestudywithdifferencesinthedenturebaselength |