Cargando…

Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length

PURPOSE: The design of the attachment must provide an optimum stress distribution around the implant. In this study, for implant overdentures with a bar/clip attachment or a locator attachment, the stress transmitted to the implant in accordance with the change in the denture base length and the ver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoo, Jin Suk, Kwon, Kung-Rock, Noh, Kwantae, Lee, Hyeonjong, Paek, Janghyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5483399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680544
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.143
_version_ 1783245748980154368
author Yoo, Jin Suk
Kwon, Kung-Rock
Noh, Kwantae
Lee, Hyeonjong
Paek, Janghyun
author_facet Yoo, Jin Suk
Kwon, Kung-Rock
Noh, Kwantae
Lee, Hyeonjong
Paek, Janghyun
author_sort Yoo, Jin Suk
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The design of the attachment must provide an optimum stress distribution around the implant. In this study, for implant overdentures with a bar/clip attachment or a locator attachment, the stress transmitted to the implant in accordance with the change in the denture base length and the vertical pressure was measured and analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Test model was created with epoxy resin. The strain gauges made a tight contact with implant surfaces. A universal testing machine was used to exert a vertical pressure on the mandibular implant overdenture and the strain rate of the implants was measured. RESULTS: Means and standard deviations of the maximum micro-deformation rates were determined. 1) Locator attachment: The implants on the working side generally showed higher strain than those on the non-working side. Tensile force was observed on the mesial surface of the implant on the working side, and the compressive force was applied to the buccal surface and on the surfaces of the implant on the non-working side. 2) Bar/clip attachment: The implants on the both non-working and working sides showed high strain; all surfaces except the mesial surface of the implant on the non-working side showed a compressive force. CONCLUSION: To minimize the strain on implants in mandibular implant overdentures, the attachment of the implant should be carefully selected and the denture base should be extended as much as possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5483399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54833992017-07-05 Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length Yoo, Jin Suk Kwon, Kung-Rock Noh, Kwantae Lee, Hyeonjong Paek, Janghyun J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The design of the attachment must provide an optimum stress distribution around the implant. In this study, for implant overdentures with a bar/clip attachment or a locator attachment, the stress transmitted to the implant in accordance with the change in the denture base length and the vertical pressure was measured and analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Test model was created with epoxy resin. The strain gauges made a tight contact with implant surfaces. A universal testing machine was used to exert a vertical pressure on the mandibular implant overdenture and the strain rate of the implants was measured. RESULTS: Means and standard deviations of the maximum micro-deformation rates were determined. 1) Locator attachment: The implants on the working side generally showed higher strain than those on the non-working side. Tensile force was observed on the mesial surface of the implant on the working side, and the compressive force was applied to the buccal surface and on the surfaces of the implant on the non-working side. 2) Bar/clip attachment: The implants on the both non-working and working sides showed high strain; all surfaces except the mesial surface of the implant on the non-working side showed a compressive force. CONCLUSION: To minimize the strain on implants in mandibular implant overdentures, the attachment of the implant should be carefully selected and the denture base should be extended as much as possible. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2017-06 2017-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5483399/ /pubmed/28680544 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.143 Text en © 2017 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yoo, Jin Suk
Kwon, Kung-Rock
Noh, Kwantae
Lee, Hyeonjong
Paek, Janghyun
Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length
title Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length
title_full Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length
title_fullStr Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length
title_full_unstemmed Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length
title_short Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length
title_sort stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: comparative study with differences in the denture base length
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5483399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680544
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.143
work_keys_str_mv AT yoojinsuk stressanalysisofmandibularimplantoverdenturewithlocatorandbarclipattachmentcomparativestudywithdifferencesinthedenturebaselength
AT kwonkungrock stressanalysisofmandibularimplantoverdenturewithlocatorandbarclipattachmentcomparativestudywithdifferencesinthedenturebaselength
AT nohkwantae stressanalysisofmandibularimplantoverdenturewithlocatorandbarclipattachmentcomparativestudywithdifferencesinthedenturebaselength
AT leehyeonjong stressanalysisofmandibularimplantoverdenturewithlocatorandbarclipattachmentcomparativestudywithdifferencesinthedenturebaselength
AT paekjanghyun stressanalysisofmandibularimplantoverdenturewithlocatorandbarclipattachmentcomparativestudywithdifferencesinthedenturebaselength