Cargando…

Transvenous versus open chest lead placement for resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: comparison of ventricular electromechanical synchronicity

BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead placement is the standard approach for left ventricular (LV) pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), while the open chest access epicardial lead placement is currently the most frequently used second choice. Our study aimed to compare the ventricular electrome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Hai-Bo, Meng, Xu, Han, Jie, Li, Yan, Zhang, Ye, Jiang, Teng-Yong, Zhao, Ying-Xin, Zhou, Yu-Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Science Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5483595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663764
http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.04.001
_version_ 1783245779706576896
author Zhang, Hai-Bo
Meng, Xu
Han, Jie
Li, Yan
Zhang, Ye
Jiang, Teng-Yong
Zhao, Ying-Xin
Zhou, Yu-Jie
author_facet Zhang, Hai-Bo
Meng, Xu
Han, Jie
Li, Yan
Zhang, Ye
Jiang, Teng-Yong
Zhao, Ying-Xin
Zhou, Yu-Jie
author_sort Zhang, Hai-Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead placement is the standard approach for left ventricular (LV) pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), while the open chest access epicardial lead placement is currently the most frequently used second choice. Our study aimed to compare the ventricular electromechanical synchronicity in patients with heart failure after CRT with these two different LV pacing techniques. METHODS: We enrolled 33 consecutive patients with refractory heart failure secondly to dilated cardiomyopathy who were eligible for CRT in this study. Nineteen patients received transvenous (TV group) while 14 received open chest (OP group) LV lead pacing. Intra- and inter-ventricular electromechanical synchronicity was assessed by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) before and one year after CRT procedure. RESULTS: Before CRT procedure, the mean QRS-duration, maximum time difference to systolic peak velocity among 12 left ventricle segments (LV Ts-12), standard deviation of time difference to systolic peak velocity of 12 left ventricle segments (LV Ts-SD), and inter-ventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) in OP and TV group were 166 ± 17 ms and 170 ± 21 ms, 391 ± 42 ms and 397 ± 36 ms, 144 ± 30 ms and 148 ± 22 ms, 58 ± 25 ms and 60 ± 36 ms, respectively (all P > 0.05). At one year after the CRT, the mean QRS-duration, LV Ts-12, LV Ts-SD, and IVMD in TV and OP group were 128 ± 14 ms and 141 ± 22 ms (P = 0.031), 136 ± 37 ms and 294 ± 119 ms (P = 0.023), 50 ± 22 ms and 96 ± 34 ms (P = 0.015), 27 ± 11 ms and 27 ± 26 ms (P = 0.86), respectively. The LV lead implantation procedure time was 53.4 ± 16.3 min for OP group and 136 ± 35.1 min for TV group (P = 0.016). The mean LV pacing threshold increased significantly from 1.7 ± 0.6 V/0.5 ms to 2.3 ± 1.6 V/0.5 ms (P < 0.05) in TV group while it remained stable in the OP group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional endovascular approach, open chest access of LV pacing for CRT leads to better improvement of the intraventricular synchronization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5483595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Science Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54835952017-06-29 Transvenous versus open chest lead placement for resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: comparison of ventricular electromechanical synchronicity Zhang, Hai-Bo Meng, Xu Han, Jie Li, Yan Zhang, Ye Jiang, Teng-Yong Zhao, Ying-Xin Zhou, Yu-Jie J Geriatr Cardiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead placement is the standard approach for left ventricular (LV) pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), while the open chest access epicardial lead placement is currently the most frequently used second choice. Our study aimed to compare the ventricular electromechanical synchronicity in patients with heart failure after CRT with these two different LV pacing techniques. METHODS: We enrolled 33 consecutive patients with refractory heart failure secondly to dilated cardiomyopathy who were eligible for CRT in this study. Nineteen patients received transvenous (TV group) while 14 received open chest (OP group) LV lead pacing. Intra- and inter-ventricular electromechanical synchronicity was assessed by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) before and one year after CRT procedure. RESULTS: Before CRT procedure, the mean QRS-duration, maximum time difference to systolic peak velocity among 12 left ventricle segments (LV Ts-12), standard deviation of time difference to systolic peak velocity of 12 left ventricle segments (LV Ts-SD), and inter-ventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) in OP and TV group were 166 ± 17 ms and 170 ± 21 ms, 391 ± 42 ms and 397 ± 36 ms, 144 ± 30 ms and 148 ± 22 ms, 58 ± 25 ms and 60 ± 36 ms, respectively (all P > 0.05). At one year after the CRT, the mean QRS-duration, LV Ts-12, LV Ts-SD, and IVMD in TV and OP group were 128 ± 14 ms and 141 ± 22 ms (P = 0.031), 136 ± 37 ms and 294 ± 119 ms (P = 0.023), 50 ± 22 ms and 96 ± 34 ms (P = 0.015), 27 ± 11 ms and 27 ± 26 ms (P = 0.86), respectively. The LV lead implantation procedure time was 53.4 ± 16.3 min for OP group and 136 ± 35.1 min for TV group (P = 0.016). The mean LV pacing threshold increased significantly from 1.7 ± 0.6 V/0.5 ms to 2.3 ± 1.6 V/0.5 ms (P < 0.05) in TV group while it remained stable in the OP group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional endovascular approach, open chest access of LV pacing for CRT leads to better improvement of the intraventricular synchronization. Science Press 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5483595/ /pubmed/28663764 http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.04.001 Text en Institute of Geriatric Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Hai-Bo
Meng, Xu
Han, Jie
Li, Yan
Zhang, Ye
Jiang, Teng-Yong
Zhao, Ying-Xin
Zhou, Yu-Jie
Transvenous versus open chest lead placement for resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: comparison of ventricular electromechanical synchronicity
title Transvenous versus open chest lead placement for resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: comparison of ventricular electromechanical synchronicity
title_full Transvenous versus open chest lead placement for resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: comparison of ventricular electromechanical synchronicity
title_fullStr Transvenous versus open chest lead placement for resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: comparison of ventricular electromechanical synchronicity
title_full_unstemmed Transvenous versus open chest lead placement for resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: comparison of ventricular electromechanical synchronicity
title_short Transvenous versus open chest lead placement for resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: comparison of ventricular electromechanical synchronicity
title_sort transvenous versus open chest lead placement for resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: comparison of ventricular electromechanical synchronicity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5483595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663764
http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.04.001
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghaibo transvenousversusopenchestleadplacementforresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithheartfailurecomparisonofventricularelectromechanicalsynchronicity
AT mengxu transvenousversusopenchestleadplacementforresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithheartfailurecomparisonofventricularelectromechanicalsynchronicity
AT hanjie transvenousversusopenchestleadplacementforresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithheartfailurecomparisonofventricularelectromechanicalsynchronicity
AT liyan transvenousversusopenchestleadplacementforresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithheartfailurecomparisonofventricularelectromechanicalsynchronicity
AT zhangye transvenousversusopenchestleadplacementforresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithheartfailurecomparisonofventricularelectromechanicalsynchronicity
AT jiangtengyong transvenousversusopenchestleadplacementforresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithheartfailurecomparisonofventricularelectromechanicalsynchronicity
AT zhaoyingxin transvenousversusopenchestleadplacementforresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithheartfailurecomparisonofventricularelectromechanicalsynchronicity
AT zhouyujie transvenousversusopenchestleadplacementforresynchronizationtherapyinpatientswithheartfailurecomparisonofventricularelectromechanicalsynchronicity