Cargando…

A Review of Issues Related to Data Acquisition and Analysis in EEG/MEG Studies

Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) are non-invasive electrophysiological methods, which record electric potentials and magnetic fields due to electric currents in synchronously-active neurons. With MEG being more sensitive to neural activity from tangential currents and EE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puce, Aina, Hämäläinen, Matti S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5483631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28561761
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7060058
_version_ 1783245787795292160
author Puce, Aina
Hämäläinen, Matti S.
author_facet Puce, Aina
Hämäläinen, Matti S.
author_sort Puce, Aina
collection PubMed
description Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) are non-invasive electrophysiological methods, which record electric potentials and magnetic fields due to electric currents in synchronously-active neurons. With MEG being more sensitive to neural activity from tangential currents and EEG being able to detect both radial and tangential sources, the two methods are complementary. Over the years, neurophysiological studies have changed considerably: high-density recordings are becoming de rigueur; there is interest in both spontaneous and evoked activity; and sophisticated artifact detection and removal methods are available. Improved head models for source estimation have also increased the precision of the current estimates, particularly for EEG and combined EEG/MEG. Because of their complementarity, more investigators are beginning to perform simultaneous EEG/MEG studies to gain more complete information about neural activity. Given the increase in methodological complexity in EEG/MEG, it is important to gather data that are of high quality and that are as artifact free as possible. Here, we discuss some issues in data acquisition and analysis of EEG and MEG data. Practical considerations for different types of EEG and MEG studies are also discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5483631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54836312017-06-28 A Review of Issues Related to Data Acquisition and Analysis in EEG/MEG Studies Puce, Aina Hämäläinen, Matti S. Brain Sci Review Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) are non-invasive electrophysiological methods, which record electric potentials and magnetic fields due to electric currents in synchronously-active neurons. With MEG being more sensitive to neural activity from tangential currents and EEG being able to detect both radial and tangential sources, the two methods are complementary. Over the years, neurophysiological studies have changed considerably: high-density recordings are becoming de rigueur; there is interest in both spontaneous and evoked activity; and sophisticated artifact detection and removal methods are available. Improved head models for source estimation have also increased the precision of the current estimates, particularly for EEG and combined EEG/MEG. Because of their complementarity, more investigators are beginning to perform simultaneous EEG/MEG studies to gain more complete information about neural activity. Given the increase in methodological complexity in EEG/MEG, it is important to gather data that are of high quality and that are as artifact free as possible. Here, we discuss some issues in data acquisition and analysis of EEG and MEG data. Practical considerations for different types of EEG and MEG studies are also discussed. MDPI 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5483631/ /pubmed/28561761 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7060058 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Puce, Aina
Hämäläinen, Matti S.
A Review of Issues Related to Data Acquisition and Analysis in EEG/MEG Studies
title A Review of Issues Related to Data Acquisition and Analysis in EEG/MEG Studies
title_full A Review of Issues Related to Data Acquisition and Analysis in EEG/MEG Studies
title_fullStr A Review of Issues Related to Data Acquisition and Analysis in EEG/MEG Studies
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Issues Related to Data Acquisition and Analysis in EEG/MEG Studies
title_short A Review of Issues Related to Data Acquisition and Analysis in EEG/MEG Studies
title_sort review of issues related to data acquisition and analysis in eeg/meg studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5483631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28561761
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7060058
work_keys_str_mv AT puceaina areviewofissuesrelatedtodataacquisitionandanalysisineegmegstudies
AT hamalainenmattis areviewofissuesrelatedtodataacquisitionandanalysisineegmegstudies
AT puceaina reviewofissuesrelatedtodataacquisitionandanalysisineegmegstudies
AT hamalainenmattis reviewofissuesrelatedtodataacquisitionandanalysisineegmegstudies