Cargando…

Clash of kingdoms or why Drosophila larvae positively respond to fungal competitors

BACKGROUND: Competition with filamentous fungi has been demonstrated to be an important cause of mortality for the vast group of insects that depend on ephemeral resources (e.g. fruit, dung, carrion). Recent data suggest that the well-known aggregation of Drosophila larvae across decaying fruit yiel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rohlfs, Marko
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC548382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15679898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-2-2
_version_ 1782122356569800704
author Rohlfs, Marko
author_facet Rohlfs, Marko
author_sort Rohlfs, Marko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Competition with filamentous fungi has been demonstrated to be an important cause of mortality for the vast group of insects that depend on ephemeral resources (e.g. fruit, dung, carrion). Recent data suggest that the well-known aggregation of Drosophila larvae across decaying fruit yields a competitive advantage over mould, by which the larvae achieve a higher survival probability in larger groups compared with smaller ones. Feeding and locomotor behaviour of larger larval groups is assumed to cause disruption of fungal hyphae, leading to suppression of fungal growth, which in turn improves the chances of larval survival to the adult stage. Given the relationship between larval density, mould suppression and larval survival, the present study has tested whether fungal-infected food patches elicit communal foraging behaviour on mould-infected sites by which larvae might hamper mould growth more efficiently. RESULTS: Based on laboratory experiments in which Drosophila larvae were offered the choice between fungal-infected and uninfected food patches, larvae significantly aggregated on patches containing young fungal colonies. Grouping behaviour was also visible when larvae were offered only fungal-infected or only uninfected patches; however, larval aggregation was less strong under these conditions than in a heterogeneous environment (infected and uninfected patches). CONCLUSION: Because filamentous fungi can be deadly competitors for insect larvae on ephemeral resources, social attraction of Drosophila larvae to fungal-infected sites leading to suppression of mould growth may reflect an adaptive behavioural response that increases insect larval fitness and can thus be discussed as an anti-competitor behaviour. These observations support the hypothesis that adverse environmental conditions operate in favour of social behaviour. In a search for the underlying mechanisms of communal behaviour in Drosophila, this study highlights the necessity of investigating the role of inter-kingdom competition as a potential driving force in the evolution of spatial behaviour in insects.
format Text
id pubmed-548382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5483822005-02-10 Clash of kingdoms or why Drosophila larvae positively respond to fungal competitors Rohlfs, Marko Front Zool Research BACKGROUND: Competition with filamentous fungi has been demonstrated to be an important cause of mortality for the vast group of insects that depend on ephemeral resources (e.g. fruit, dung, carrion). Recent data suggest that the well-known aggregation of Drosophila larvae across decaying fruit yields a competitive advantage over mould, by which the larvae achieve a higher survival probability in larger groups compared with smaller ones. Feeding and locomotor behaviour of larger larval groups is assumed to cause disruption of fungal hyphae, leading to suppression of fungal growth, which in turn improves the chances of larval survival to the adult stage. Given the relationship between larval density, mould suppression and larval survival, the present study has tested whether fungal-infected food patches elicit communal foraging behaviour on mould-infected sites by which larvae might hamper mould growth more efficiently. RESULTS: Based on laboratory experiments in which Drosophila larvae were offered the choice between fungal-infected and uninfected food patches, larvae significantly aggregated on patches containing young fungal colonies. Grouping behaviour was also visible when larvae were offered only fungal-infected or only uninfected patches; however, larval aggregation was less strong under these conditions than in a heterogeneous environment (infected and uninfected patches). CONCLUSION: Because filamentous fungi can be deadly competitors for insect larvae on ephemeral resources, social attraction of Drosophila larvae to fungal-infected sites leading to suppression of mould growth may reflect an adaptive behavioural response that increases insect larval fitness and can thus be discussed as an anti-competitor behaviour. These observations support the hypothesis that adverse environmental conditions operate in favour of social behaviour. In a search for the underlying mechanisms of communal behaviour in Drosophila, this study highlights the necessity of investigating the role of inter-kingdom competition as a potential driving force in the evolution of spatial behaviour in insects. BioMed Central 2005-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC548382/ /pubmed/15679898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-2-2 Text en Copyright © 2005 Rohlfs; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Rohlfs, Marko
Clash of kingdoms or why Drosophila larvae positively respond to fungal competitors
title Clash of kingdoms or why Drosophila larvae positively respond to fungal competitors
title_full Clash of kingdoms or why Drosophila larvae positively respond to fungal competitors
title_fullStr Clash of kingdoms or why Drosophila larvae positively respond to fungal competitors
title_full_unstemmed Clash of kingdoms or why Drosophila larvae positively respond to fungal competitors
title_short Clash of kingdoms or why Drosophila larvae positively respond to fungal competitors
title_sort clash of kingdoms or why drosophila larvae positively respond to fungal competitors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC548382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15679898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-2-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rohlfsmarko clashofkingdomsorwhydrosophilalarvaepositivelyrespondtofungalcompetitors