Cargando…

Reimbursement and use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

The use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer increased through the mid-2000s, in association with acquisition of the devices by large urology groups. More recently, reimbursement for IMRT in the office setting (generally representing freestanding facilities owned by ph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahinian, Vahakn B., Kaufman, Samuel R., Yan, Phyllis, Herrel, Lindsey A., Borza, Tudor, Hollenbeck, Brent K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006929
_version_ 1783245830689390592
author Shahinian, Vahakn B.
Kaufman, Samuel R.
Yan, Phyllis
Herrel, Lindsey A.
Borza, Tudor
Hollenbeck, Brent K.
author_facet Shahinian, Vahakn B.
Kaufman, Samuel R.
Yan, Phyllis
Herrel, Lindsey A.
Borza, Tudor
Hollenbeck, Brent K.
author_sort Shahinian, Vahakn B.
collection PubMed
description The use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer increased through the mid-2000s, in association with acquisition of the devices by large urology groups. More recently, reimbursement for IMRT in the office setting (generally representing freestanding facilities owned by physicians) has been declining. The aim of the study was to examine trends in IMRT use and related payments in the office versus hospital outpatient setting over time. In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 66,967 men aged 66 years or older, with newly diagnosed prostate cancer from 2007 through 2012 were identified in a 20% national sample of Medicare claims. IMRT use in the office versus hospital outpatient setting was examined over time, adjusted for patient characteristics using multivariable logistic regression models. Mean reimbursement for IMRT treatments and total IMRT-related payments were plotted by year. IMRT use increased from 28.6% to 38.0% of newly diagnosed men with prostate cancer over the study period, exclusively related to growth in the office setting. In particular, use in the office setting increased from 13.2% in 2007 to 22.1%, whereas use in the hospital outpatient setting remained essentially steady throughout the period around 15%. During the same period mean reimbursement for IMRT in the office setting declined from $504 per individual radiation treatment to $381, whereas it increased from $283 to $380 in the hospital outpatient setting. However, total IMRT-related payments in the office setting increased through 2011 due to increased utilization, falling only in 2012 (to $35.7 million from $48.3 million in 2011) related both to continued declines in reimbursement and a large reduction in new cases of prostate cancer. In conclusion, use of IMRT in the physician office setting in men diagnosed with prostate cancer has continued to increase in the face of declining reimbursement. Total payments for IMRT fell only in 2012, following a substantial reduction in new cases of prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5484181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54841812017-07-06 Reimbursement and use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer Shahinian, Vahakn B. Kaufman, Samuel R. Yan, Phyllis Herrel, Lindsey A. Borza, Tudor Hollenbeck, Brent K. Medicine (Baltimore) 7300 The use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer increased through the mid-2000s, in association with acquisition of the devices by large urology groups. More recently, reimbursement for IMRT in the office setting (generally representing freestanding facilities owned by physicians) has been declining. The aim of the study was to examine trends in IMRT use and related payments in the office versus hospital outpatient setting over time. In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 66,967 men aged 66 years or older, with newly diagnosed prostate cancer from 2007 through 2012 were identified in a 20% national sample of Medicare claims. IMRT use in the office versus hospital outpatient setting was examined over time, adjusted for patient characteristics using multivariable logistic regression models. Mean reimbursement for IMRT treatments and total IMRT-related payments were plotted by year. IMRT use increased from 28.6% to 38.0% of newly diagnosed men with prostate cancer over the study period, exclusively related to growth in the office setting. In particular, use in the office setting increased from 13.2% in 2007 to 22.1%, whereas use in the hospital outpatient setting remained essentially steady throughout the period around 15%. During the same period mean reimbursement for IMRT in the office setting declined from $504 per individual radiation treatment to $381, whereas it increased from $283 to $380 in the hospital outpatient setting. However, total IMRT-related payments in the office setting increased through 2011 due to increased utilization, falling only in 2012 (to $35.7 million from $48.3 million in 2011) related both to continued declines in reimbursement and a large reduction in new cases of prostate cancer. In conclusion, use of IMRT in the physician office setting in men diagnosed with prostate cancer has continued to increase in the face of declining reimbursement. Total payments for IMRT fell only in 2012, following a substantial reduction in new cases of prostate cancer. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5484181/ /pubmed/28640073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006929 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 7300
Shahinian, Vahakn B.
Kaufman, Samuel R.
Yan, Phyllis
Herrel, Lindsey A.
Borza, Tudor
Hollenbeck, Brent K.
Reimbursement and use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title Reimbursement and use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_full Reimbursement and use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_fullStr Reimbursement and use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Reimbursement and use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_short Reimbursement and use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
title_sort reimbursement and use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
topic 7300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006929
work_keys_str_mv AT shahinianvahaknb reimbursementanduseofintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT kaufmansamuelr reimbursementanduseofintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT yanphyllis reimbursementanduseofintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT herrellindseya reimbursementanduseofintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT borzatudor reimbursementanduseofintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer
AT hollenbeckbrentk reimbursementanduseofintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforprostatecancer