Cargando…

Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis

With the rapid increase in the incidence of mental disorders and mental issues, psychiatry has become one of the fastest growing clinical medical disciplines. Development priorities and research foci in this field have evolved over different periods. All the articles in 10 psychiatric journals with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Ying, Jin, Xing, Xue, Yunzhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007349
_version_ 1783245850145718272
author Wu, Ying
Jin, Xing
Xue, Yunzhen
author_facet Wu, Ying
Jin, Xing
Xue, Yunzhen
author_sort Wu, Ying
collection PubMed
description With the rapid increase in the incidence of mental disorders and mental issues, psychiatry has become one of the fastest growing clinical medical disciplines. Development priorities and research foci in this field have evolved over different periods. All the articles in 10 psychiatric journals with the highest impact factors were selected from the Science Citation Index (SCI) in Web of Science from 2001 to 2015. The information visualization software Sci(2) was used to conduct co-word and clustering analyses on these articles. The articles were divided into 3 periods: 2001 to 2005, 2006 to 2010, and 2011 to 2015. Each bibliographic record contained a title, author names, abstract, keywords, references, and other information. During the 3 periods between 2001 and 2015, child and adolescent psychiatry, major depression, schizophrenia, and prefrontal cortex were constant research foci. The brain and meta-analysis gradually became new research foci, although research on symptoms slowly decreased. Molecular genetics was also an area of interest. Using scientometrics technology to visualize research foci can provide us with new ideas and research methods. Co-word analysis for the preliminary exploration of research foci and developmental trends in psychiatry is helpful in finding developmental rules, choices of topics, and innovative research. Our study had some limitations. In the future, we should expand our research scope and use a variety of research methods to enrich our results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5484261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54842612017-07-06 Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis Wu, Ying Jin, Xing Xue, Yunzhen Medicine (Baltimore) 5000 With the rapid increase in the incidence of mental disorders and mental issues, psychiatry has become one of the fastest growing clinical medical disciplines. Development priorities and research foci in this field have evolved over different periods. All the articles in 10 psychiatric journals with the highest impact factors were selected from the Science Citation Index (SCI) in Web of Science from 2001 to 2015. The information visualization software Sci(2) was used to conduct co-word and clustering analyses on these articles. The articles were divided into 3 periods: 2001 to 2005, 2006 to 2010, and 2011 to 2015. Each bibliographic record contained a title, author names, abstract, keywords, references, and other information. During the 3 periods between 2001 and 2015, child and adolescent psychiatry, major depression, schizophrenia, and prefrontal cortex were constant research foci. The brain and meta-analysis gradually became new research foci, although research on symptoms slowly decreased. Molecular genetics was also an area of interest. Using scientometrics technology to visualize research foci can provide us with new ideas and research methods. Co-word analysis for the preliminary exploration of research foci and developmental trends in psychiatry is helpful in finding developmental rules, choices of topics, and innovative research. Our study had some limitations. In the future, we should expand our research scope and use a variety of research methods to enrich our results. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5484261/ /pubmed/28640150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007349 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 5000
Wu, Ying
Jin, Xing
Xue, Yunzhen
Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis
title Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis
title_full Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis
title_short Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis
title_sort evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis
topic 5000
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007349
work_keys_str_mv AT wuying evaluationofresearchtopicevolutioninpsychiatryusingcowordanalysis
AT jinxing evaluationofresearchtopicevolutioninpsychiatryusingcowordanalysis
AT xueyunzhen evaluationofresearchtopicevolutioninpsychiatryusingcowordanalysis