Cargando…
Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis
With the rapid increase in the incidence of mental disorders and mental issues, psychiatry has become one of the fastest growing clinical medical disciplines. Development priorities and research foci in this field have evolved over different periods. All the articles in 10 psychiatric journals with...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007349 |
_version_ | 1783245850145718272 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Ying Jin, Xing Xue, Yunzhen |
author_facet | Wu, Ying Jin, Xing Xue, Yunzhen |
author_sort | Wu, Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the rapid increase in the incidence of mental disorders and mental issues, psychiatry has become one of the fastest growing clinical medical disciplines. Development priorities and research foci in this field have evolved over different periods. All the articles in 10 psychiatric journals with the highest impact factors were selected from the Science Citation Index (SCI) in Web of Science from 2001 to 2015. The information visualization software Sci(2) was used to conduct co-word and clustering analyses on these articles. The articles were divided into 3 periods: 2001 to 2005, 2006 to 2010, and 2011 to 2015. Each bibliographic record contained a title, author names, abstract, keywords, references, and other information. During the 3 periods between 2001 and 2015, child and adolescent psychiatry, major depression, schizophrenia, and prefrontal cortex were constant research foci. The brain and meta-analysis gradually became new research foci, although research on symptoms slowly decreased. Molecular genetics was also an area of interest. Using scientometrics technology to visualize research foci can provide us with new ideas and research methods. Co-word analysis for the preliminary exploration of research foci and developmental trends in psychiatry is helpful in finding developmental rules, choices of topics, and innovative research. Our study had some limitations. In the future, we should expand our research scope and use a variety of research methods to enrich our results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5484261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54842612017-07-06 Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis Wu, Ying Jin, Xing Xue, Yunzhen Medicine (Baltimore) 5000 With the rapid increase in the incidence of mental disorders and mental issues, psychiatry has become one of the fastest growing clinical medical disciplines. Development priorities and research foci in this field have evolved over different periods. All the articles in 10 psychiatric journals with the highest impact factors were selected from the Science Citation Index (SCI) in Web of Science from 2001 to 2015. The information visualization software Sci(2) was used to conduct co-word and clustering analyses on these articles. The articles were divided into 3 periods: 2001 to 2005, 2006 to 2010, and 2011 to 2015. Each bibliographic record contained a title, author names, abstract, keywords, references, and other information. During the 3 periods between 2001 and 2015, child and adolescent psychiatry, major depression, schizophrenia, and prefrontal cortex were constant research foci. The brain and meta-analysis gradually became new research foci, although research on symptoms slowly decreased. Molecular genetics was also an area of interest. Using scientometrics technology to visualize research foci can provide us with new ideas and research methods. Co-word analysis for the preliminary exploration of research foci and developmental trends in psychiatry is helpful in finding developmental rules, choices of topics, and innovative research. Our study had some limitations. In the future, we should expand our research scope and use a variety of research methods to enrich our results. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5484261/ /pubmed/28640150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007349 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5000 Wu, Ying Jin, Xing Xue, Yunzhen Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis |
title | Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis |
title_full | Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis |
title_short | Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis |
title_sort | evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis |
topic | 5000 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007349 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuying evaluationofresearchtopicevolutioninpsychiatryusingcowordanalysis AT jinxing evaluationofresearchtopicevolutioninpsychiatryusingcowordanalysis AT xueyunzhen evaluationofresearchtopicevolutioninpsychiatryusingcowordanalysis |