Cargando…
Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets?
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess in vitro the influence of the CO(2) laser and of the type of ceramic bracket on the shear bond strength (SBS) to enamel. METHODS: A total of 60 enamel test surfaces were obtained from bovine incisors and randomly assigned to two groups, according to the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.055-060.oar |
_version_ | 1783245852261744640 |
---|---|
author | Romano, Fábio Lourenço Pessoti, Giovanna Galo, Rodrigo Gomes-Silva, Jaciara Miranda Lucisano, Marília Pacífico Borsatto, Maria Cristina Nelson-Filho, Paulo |
author_facet | Romano, Fábio Lourenço Pessoti, Giovanna Galo, Rodrigo Gomes-Silva, Jaciara Miranda Lucisano, Marília Pacífico Borsatto, Maria Cristina Nelson-Filho, Paulo |
author_sort | Romano, Fábio Lourenço |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess in vitro the influence of the CO(2) laser and of the type of ceramic bracket on the shear bond strength (SBS) to enamel. METHODS: A total of 60 enamel test surfaces were obtained from bovine incisors and randomly assigned to two groups, according to the ceramic bracket used: Allure (A); Transcend (T). Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (n = 15): L, laser (10W, 3s); C, no laser, or control. Twenty-four hours after the bonding protocol using Transbond XT, SBS was tested at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min in a universal testing machine. After debonding, the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was evaluated at 10 x magnification and compared among the groups. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s, Mann-Whitney’s and Kruskal-Wallis tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Mean SBS in MPa were: AL = 0.88 ± 0.84; AC = 12.22 ± 3.45; TL = 12.10 ± 5.11; TC = 17.71 ± 6.16. ARI analysis showed that 73% of the specimens presented the entire adhesive remaining on the tooth surfaces (score 3). TC group presented significantly higher SBS than the other groups. The lased specimens showed significantly lower bond strength than the non-lased groups for both tested brackets. CONCLUSION: CO(2) laser irradiation decreased SBS values of the polycrystalline ceramic brackets, mainly Allure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5484270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dental Press International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54842702017-06-30 Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets? Romano, Fábio Lourenço Pessoti, Giovanna Galo, Rodrigo Gomes-Silva, Jaciara Miranda Lucisano, Marília Pacífico Borsatto, Maria Cristina Nelson-Filho, Paulo Dental Press J Orthod Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess in vitro the influence of the CO(2) laser and of the type of ceramic bracket on the shear bond strength (SBS) to enamel. METHODS: A total of 60 enamel test surfaces were obtained from bovine incisors and randomly assigned to two groups, according to the ceramic bracket used: Allure (A); Transcend (T). Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (n = 15): L, laser (10W, 3s); C, no laser, or control. Twenty-four hours after the bonding protocol using Transbond XT, SBS was tested at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min in a universal testing machine. After debonding, the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was evaluated at 10 x magnification and compared among the groups. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s, Mann-Whitney’s and Kruskal-Wallis tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Mean SBS in MPa were: AL = 0.88 ± 0.84; AC = 12.22 ± 3.45; TL = 12.10 ± 5.11; TC = 17.71 ± 6.16. ARI analysis showed that 73% of the specimens presented the entire adhesive remaining on the tooth surfaces (score 3). TC group presented significantly higher SBS than the other groups. The lased specimens showed significantly lower bond strength than the non-lased groups for both tested brackets. CONCLUSION: CO(2) laser irradiation decreased SBS values of the polycrystalline ceramic brackets, mainly Allure. Dental Press International 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5484270/ /pubmed/28658356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.055-060.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Articles Romano, Fábio Lourenço Pessoti, Giovanna Galo, Rodrigo Gomes-Silva, Jaciara Miranda Lucisano, Marília Pacífico Borsatto, Maria Cristina Nelson-Filho, Paulo Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets? |
title | Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets? |
title_full | Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets? |
title_fullStr | Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets? |
title_short | Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets? |
title_sort | does the co(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets? |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.055-060.oar |
work_keys_str_mv | AT romanofabiolourenco doestheco2laserreducebondstrengthindifferenttypesofceramicbrackets AT pessotigiovanna doestheco2laserreducebondstrengthindifferenttypesofceramicbrackets AT galorodrigo doestheco2laserreducebondstrengthindifferenttypesofceramicbrackets AT gomessilvajaciaramiranda doestheco2laserreducebondstrengthindifferenttypesofceramicbrackets AT lucisanomariliapacifico doestheco2laserreducebondstrengthindifferenttypesofceramicbrackets AT borsattomariacristina doestheco2laserreducebondstrengthindifferenttypesofceramicbrackets AT nelsonfilhopaulo doestheco2laserreducebondstrengthindifferenttypesofceramicbrackets |