Cargando…

Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess in vitro the influence of the CO(2) laser and of the type of ceramic bracket on the shear bond strength (SBS) to enamel. METHODS: A total of 60 enamel test surfaces were obtained from bovine incisors and randomly assigned to two groups, according to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romano, Fábio Lourenço, Pessoti, Giovanna, Galo, Rodrigo, Gomes-Silva, Jaciara Miranda, Lucisano, Marília Pacífico, Borsatto, Maria Cristina, Nelson-Filho, Paulo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.055-060.oar
_version_ 1783245852261744640
author Romano, Fábio Lourenço
Pessoti, Giovanna
Galo, Rodrigo
Gomes-Silva, Jaciara Miranda
Lucisano, Marília Pacífico
Borsatto, Maria Cristina
Nelson-Filho, Paulo
author_facet Romano, Fábio Lourenço
Pessoti, Giovanna
Galo, Rodrigo
Gomes-Silva, Jaciara Miranda
Lucisano, Marília Pacífico
Borsatto, Maria Cristina
Nelson-Filho, Paulo
author_sort Romano, Fábio Lourenço
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess in vitro the influence of the CO(2) laser and of the type of ceramic bracket on the shear bond strength (SBS) to enamel. METHODS: A total of 60 enamel test surfaces were obtained from bovine incisors and randomly assigned to two groups, according to the ceramic bracket used: Allure (A); Transcend (T). Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (n = 15): L, laser (10W, 3s); C, no laser, or control. Twenty-four hours after the bonding protocol using Transbond XT, SBS was tested at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min in a universal testing machine. After debonding, the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was evaluated at 10 x magnification and compared among the groups. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s, Mann-Whitney’s and Kruskal-Wallis tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Mean SBS in MPa were: AL = 0.88 ± 0.84; AC = 12.22 ± 3.45; TL = 12.10 ± 5.11; TC = 17.71 ± 6.16. ARI analysis showed that 73% of the specimens presented the entire adhesive remaining on the tooth surfaces (score 3). TC group presented significantly higher SBS than the other groups. The lased specimens showed significantly lower bond strength than the non-lased groups for both tested brackets. CONCLUSION: CO(2) laser irradiation decreased SBS values of the polycrystalline ceramic brackets, mainly Allure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5484270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54842702017-06-30 Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets? Romano, Fábio Lourenço Pessoti, Giovanna Galo, Rodrigo Gomes-Silva, Jaciara Miranda Lucisano, Marília Pacífico Borsatto, Maria Cristina Nelson-Filho, Paulo Dental Press J Orthod Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess in vitro the influence of the CO(2) laser and of the type of ceramic bracket on the shear bond strength (SBS) to enamel. METHODS: A total of 60 enamel test surfaces were obtained from bovine incisors and randomly assigned to two groups, according to the ceramic bracket used: Allure (A); Transcend (T). Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (n = 15): L, laser (10W, 3s); C, no laser, or control. Twenty-four hours after the bonding protocol using Transbond XT, SBS was tested at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min in a universal testing machine. After debonding, the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was evaluated at 10 x magnification and compared among the groups. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s, Mann-Whitney’s and Kruskal-Wallis tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Mean SBS in MPa were: AL = 0.88 ± 0.84; AC = 12.22 ± 3.45; TL = 12.10 ± 5.11; TC = 17.71 ± 6.16. ARI analysis showed that 73% of the specimens presented the entire adhesive remaining on the tooth surfaces (score 3). TC group presented significantly higher SBS than the other groups. The lased specimens showed significantly lower bond strength than the non-lased groups for both tested brackets. CONCLUSION: CO(2) laser irradiation decreased SBS values of the polycrystalline ceramic brackets, mainly Allure. Dental Press International 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5484270/ /pubmed/28658356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.055-060.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Articles
Romano, Fábio Lourenço
Pessoti, Giovanna
Galo, Rodrigo
Gomes-Silva, Jaciara Miranda
Lucisano, Marília Pacífico
Borsatto, Maria Cristina
Nelson-Filho, Paulo
Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets?
title Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets?
title_full Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets?
title_fullStr Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets?
title_full_unstemmed Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets?
title_short Does the CO(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets?
title_sort does the co(2) laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets?
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.055-060.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT romanofabiolourenco doestheco2laserreducebondstrengthindifferenttypesofceramicbrackets
AT pessotigiovanna doestheco2laserreducebondstrengthindifferenttypesofceramicbrackets
AT galorodrigo doestheco2laserreducebondstrengthindifferenttypesofceramicbrackets
AT gomessilvajaciaramiranda doestheco2laserreducebondstrengthindifferenttypesofceramicbrackets
AT lucisanomariliapacifico doestheco2laserreducebondstrengthindifferenttypesofceramicbrackets
AT borsattomariacristina doestheco2laserreducebondstrengthindifferenttypesofceramicbrackets
AT nelsonfilhopaulo doestheco2laserreducebondstrengthindifferenttypesofceramicbrackets