Cargando…

Subjective facial analysis and its correlation with dental relationships

INTRODUCTION: Subjective facial analysis is a diagnostic method that provides morphological analysis of the face. Thus, the aim of the present study was to compare the facial and dental diagnoses and investigate their relationship. METHODS: This sample consisted of 151 children (7 to 13 years old),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siécola, Gustavo Silva, Capelozza, Leopoldino, Lorenzoni, Diego Coelho, Janson, Guilherme, Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.087-094.oar
_version_ 1783245853234823168
author Siécola, Gustavo Silva
Capelozza, Leopoldino
Lorenzoni, Diego Coelho
Janson, Guilherme
Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
author_facet Siécola, Gustavo Silva
Capelozza, Leopoldino
Lorenzoni, Diego Coelho
Janson, Guilherme
Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
author_sort Siécola, Gustavo Silva
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Subjective facial analysis is a diagnostic method that provides morphological analysis of the face. Thus, the aim of the present study was to compare the facial and dental diagnoses and investigate their relationship. METHODS: This sample consisted of 151 children (7 to 13 years old), without previous orthodontic treatment, analyzed by an orthodontist. Standardized extraoral and intraoral photographs were taken for the subjective facial classification according to Facial Pattern classification and occlusal analyses. It has been researched the occurrence of different Facial Patterns, the relationship between Facial Pattern classification in frontal and profile views, the relationship between Facial Patterns and Angle classification, and between anterior open bite and Long Face Pattern. RESULTS: Facial Pattern I was verified in 64.24% of the children, Pattern II in 21.29%, Pattern III in 6.62%, Long Face Pattern in 5.96% and Short Face Pattern in 1.99%. A substantial strength of agreement of approximately 84% between frontal and profile classification of Facial Pattern was observed (Kappa = 0.69). Agreement between the Angle classification and the Facial Pattern was seen in approximately 63% of the cases (Kappa = 0.27). Long Face Pattern did not present more open bite prevalence. CONCLUSION: Facial Patterns I and II were the most prevalent in children and the less prevalent was the Short Face Pattern. A significant concordance was observed between profile and frontal subjective facial analysis. There was slight concordance between the Facial Pattern and the sagittal dental relationships. The anterior open bite (AOB) was not significantly prevalent in any Facial Pattern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5484274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54842742017-06-30 Subjective facial analysis and its correlation with dental relationships Siécola, Gustavo Silva Capelozza, Leopoldino Lorenzoni, Diego Coelho Janson, Guilherme Henriques, José Fernando Castanha Dental Press J Orthod Articles INTRODUCTION: Subjective facial analysis is a diagnostic method that provides morphological analysis of the face. Thus, the aim of the present study was to compare the facial and dental diagnoses and investigate their relationship. METHODS: This sample consisted of 151 children (7 to 13 years old), without previous orthodontic treatment, analyzed by an orthodontist. Standardized extraoral and intraoral photographs were taken for the subjective facial classification according to Facial Pattern classification and occlusal analyses. It has been researched the occurrence of different Facial Patterns, the relationship between Facial Pattern classification in frontal and profile views, the relationship between Facial Patterns and Angle classification, and between anterior open bite and Long Face Pattern. RESULTS: Facial Pattern I was verified in 64.24% of the children, Pattern II in 21.29%, Pattern III in 6.62%, Long Face Pattern in 5.96% and Short Face Pattern in 1.99%. A substantial strength of agreement of approximately 84% between frontal and profile classification of Facial Pattern was observed (Kappa = 0.69). Agreement between the Angle classification and the Facial Pattern was seen in approximately 63% of the cases (Kappa = 0.27). Long Face Pattern did not present more open bite prevalence. CONCLUSION: Facial Patterns I and II were the most prevalent in children and the less prevalent was the Short Face Pattern. A significant concordance was observed between profile and frontal subjective facial analysis. There was slight concordance between the Facial Pattern and the sagittal dental relationships. The anterior open bite (AOB) was not significantly prevalent in any Facial Pattern. Dental Press International 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5484274/ /pubmed/28658360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.087-094.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Articles
Siécola, Gustavo Silva
Capelozza, Leopoldino
Lorenzoni, Diego Coelho
Janson, Guilherme
Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
Subjective facial analysis and its correlation with dental relationships
title Subjective facial analysis and its correlation with dental relationships
title_full Subjective facial analysis and its correlation with dental relationships
title_fullStr Subjective facial analysis and its correlation with dental relationships
title_full_unstemmed Subjective facial analysis and its correlation with dental relationships
title_short Subjective facial analysis and its correlation with dental relationships
title_sort subjective facial analysis and its correlation with dental relationships
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.087-094.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT siecolagustavosilva subjectivefacialanalysisanditscorrelationwithdentalrelationships
AT capelozzaleopoldino subjectivefacialanalysisanditscorrelationwithdentalrelationships
AT lorenzonidiegocoelho subjectivefacialanalysisanditscorrelationwithdentalrelationships
AT jansonguilherme subjectivefacialanalysisanditscorrelationwithdentalrelationships
AT henriquesjosefernandocastanha subjectivefacialanalysisanditscorrelationwithdentalrelationships