Cargando…
A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing
Ten years ago, researchers using event‐related brain potentials (ERPs) to study language comprehension were puzzled by what looked like a Semantic Illusion: Semantically anomalous, but structurally well‐formed sentences did not affect the N400 component—traditionally taken to reflect semantic integr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28000963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12461 |
_version_ | 1783245863282278400 |
---|---|
author | Brouwer, Harm Crocker, Matthew W. Venhuizen, Noortje J. Hoeks, John C. J. |
author_facet | Brouwer, Harm Crocker, Matthew W. Venhuizen, Noortje J. Hoeks, John C. J. |
author_sort | Brouwer, Harm |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ten years ago, researchers using event‐related brain potentials (ERPs) to study language comprehension were puzzled by what looked like a Semantic Illusion: Semantically anomalous, but structurally well‐formed sentences did not affect the N400 component—traditionally taken to reflect semantic integration—but instead produced a P600 effect, which is generally linked to syntactic processing. This finding led to a considerable amount of debate, and a number of complex processing models have been proposed as an explanation. What these models have in common is that they postulate two or more separate processing streams, in order to reconcile the Semantic Illusion and other semantically induced P600 effects with the traditional interpretations of the N400 and the P600. Recently, however, these multi‐stream models have been called into question, and a simpler single‐stream model has been proposed. According to this alternative model, the N400 component reflects the retrieval of word meaning from semantic memory, and the P600 component indexes the integration of this meaning into the unfolding utterance interpretation. In the present paper, we provide support for this “Retrieval–Integration (RI)” account by instantiating it as a neurocomputational model. This neurocomputational model is the first to successfully simulate the N400 and P600 amplitude in language comprehension, and simulations with this model provide a proof of concept of the single‐stream RI account of semantically induced patterns of N400 and P600 modulations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5484319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54843192017-07-10 A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing Brouwer, Harm Crocker, Matthew W. Venhuizen, Noortje J. Hoeks, John C. J. Cogn Sci Regular Articles Ten years ago, researchers using event‐related brain potentials (ERPs) to study language comprehension were puzzled by what looked like a Semantic Illusion: Semantically anomalous, but structurally well‐formed sentences did not affect the N400 component—traditionally taken to reflect semantic integration—but instead produced a P600 effect, which is generally linked to syntactic processing. This finding led to a considerable amount of debate, and a number of complex processing models have been proposed as an explanation. What these models have in common is that they postulate two or more separate processing streams, in order to reconcile the Semantic Illusion and other semantically induced P600 effects with the traditional interpretations of the N400 and the P600. Recently, however, these multi‐stream models have been called into question, and a simpler single‐stream model has been proposed. According to this alternative model, the N400 component reflects the retrieval of word meaning from semantic memory, and the P600 component indexes the integration of this meaning into the unfolding utterance interpretation. In the present paper, we provide support for this “Retrieval–Integration (RI)” account by instantiating it as a neurocomputational model. This neurocomputational model is the first to successfully simulate the N400 and P600 amplitude in language comprehension, and simulations with this model provide a proof of concept of the single‐stream RI account of semantically induced patterns of N400 and P600 modulations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-12-21 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5484319/ /pubmed/28000963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12461 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Cognitive Science is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the Cognitive Science Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Regular Articles Brouwer, Harm Crocker, Matthew W. Venhuizen, Noortje J. Hoeks, John C. J. A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing |
title | A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing |
title_full | A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing |
title_fullStr | A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing |
title_full_unstemmed | A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing |
title_short | A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing |
title_sort | neurocomputational model of the n400 and the p600 in language processing |
topic | Regular Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28000963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12461 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brouwerharm aneurocomputationalmodelofthen400andthep600inlanguageprocessing AT crockermattheww aneurocomputationalmodelofthen400andthep600inlanguageprocessing AT venhuizennoortjej aneurocomputationalmodelofthen400andthep600inlanguageprocessing AT hoeksjohncj aneurocomputationalmodelofthen400andthep600inlanguageprocessing AT brouwerharm neurocomputationalmodelofthen400andthep600inlanguageprocessing AT crockermattheww neurocomputationalmodelofthen400andthep600inlanguageprocessing AT venhuizennoortjej neurocomputationalmodelofthen400andthep600inlanguageprocessing AT hoeksjohncj neurocomputationalmodelofthen400andthep600inlanguageprocessing |