Cargando…

Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction?

BACKGROUND: Results of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUBD) are unknown in case of proximal stricture. The aim is to assess clinical outcomes of EUBD in patients with malignant hilar obstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing EUBD with hilar strictures were prospectively included. Pri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moryoussef, Frédérick, Sportes, Adrien, Leblanc, Sarah, Bachet, Jean Baptiste, Chaussade, Stanislas, Prat, Frédéric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28804514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756283X17702614
_version_ 1783245882789986304
author Moryoussef, Frédérick
Sportes, Adrien
Leblanc, Sarah
Bachet, Jean Baptiste
Chaussade, Stanislas
Prat, Frédéric
author_facet Moryoussef, Frédérick
Sportes, Adrien
Leblanc, Sarah
Bachet, Jean Baptiste
Chaussade, Stanislas
Prat, Frédéric
author_sort Moryoussef, Frédérick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Results of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUBD) are unknown in case of proximal stricture. The aim is to assess clinical outcomes of EUBD in patients with malignant hilar obstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing EUBD with hilar strictures were prospectively included. Primary outcome was clinical success at 7 and 30 days (defined by 50% bilirubin decrease). Secondary outcomes were technical success, procedure-related complications, length of hospital stay, reintervention rate, survival and chemotherapy administration. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with a mean age of 68.8 years were included. On 15 classable stenosis, 7 (47%) were noted Bismuth I–II, 7 (47%) Bismuth III, and 1 (6.7%) Bismuth IV. Reasons for EUBD were surgically modified anatomy in 10 patients (55.6%), impassable stricture at ERCP in 7 (38.9%) and duodenal obstruction in 1 (5.6%). Only hepaticogastrostomy was performed. Clinical success was at day 7 and 30 respectively 72.2% and 68.8%. Technical success was 94%. Complications occurred in 3 (16.7%) patients. Median (range) length of hospital stay was 10 (6–35) days. Reintervention rate was 16.7%. Median (range) survival was 79 (5–390) days. Chemotherapy was possible in 10 (55.6%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: EUBD is feasible for hilar obstruction for surgically altered anatomy or after ERCP failure. Clinical outcome is satisfactory when considering underlying advanced disease, allowing chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5484435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54844352017-08-12 Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction? Moryoussef, Frédérick Sportes, Adrien Leblanc, Sarah Bachet, Jean Baptiste Chaussade, Stanislas Prat, Frédéric Therap Adv Gastroenterol Original Research BACKGROUND: Results of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUBD) are unknown in case of proximal stricture. The aim is to assess clinical outcomes of EUBD in patients with malignant hilar obstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing EUBD with hilar strictures were prospectively included. Primary outcome was clinical success at 7 and 30 days (defined by 50% bilirubin decrease). Secondary outcomes were technical success, procedure-related complications, length of hospital stay, reintervention rate, survival and chemotherapy administration. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with a mean age of 68.8 years were included. On 15 classable stenosis, 7 (47%) were noted Bismuth I–II, 7 (47%) Bismuth III, and 1 (6.7%) Bismuth IV. Reasons for EUBD were surgically modified anatomy in 10 patients (55.6%), impassable stricture at ERCP in 7 (38.9%) and duodenal obstruction in 1 (5.6%). Only hepaticogastrostomy was performed. Clinical success was at day 7 and 30 respectively 72.2% and 68.8%. Technical success was 94%. Complications occurred in 3 (16.7%) patients. Median (range) length of hospital stay was 10 (6–35) days. Reintervention rate was 16.7%. Median (range) survival was 79 (5–390) days. Chemotherapy was possible in 10 (55.6%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: EUBD is feasible for hilar obstruction for surgically altered anatomy or after ERCP failure. Clinical outcome is satisfactory when considering underlying advanced disease, allowing chemotherapy. SAGE Publications 2017-04-20 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5484435/ /pubmed/28804514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756283X17702614 Text en © The Author(s), 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Moryoussef, Frédérick
Sportes, Adrien
Leblanc, Sarah
Bachet, Jean Baptiste
Chaussade, Stanislas
Prat, Frédéric
Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction?
title Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction?
title_full Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction?
title_fullStr Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction?
title_full_unstemmed Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction?
title_short Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction?
title_sort is eus-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28804514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756283X17702614
work_keys_str_mv AT moryousseffrederick iseusguideddrainageasuitablealternativetechniqueincaseofproximalbiliaryobstruction
AT sportesadrien iseusguideddrainageasuitablealternativetechniqueincaseofproximalbiliaryobstruction
AT leblancsarah iseusguideddrainageasuitablealternativetechniqueincaseofproximalbiliaryobstruction
AT bachetjeanbaptiste iseusguideddrainageasuitablealternativetechniqueincaseofproximalbiliaryobstruction
AT chaussadestanislas iseusguideddrainageasuitablealternativetechniqueincaseofproximalbiliaryobstruction
AT pratfrederic iseusguideddrainageasuitablealternativetechniqueincaseofproximalbiliaryobstruction