Cargando…
Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction?
BACKGROUND: Results of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUBD) are unknown in case of proximal stricture. The aim is to assess clinical outcomes of EUBD in patients with malignant hilar obstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing EUBD with hilar strictures were prospectively included. Pri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28804514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756283X17702614 |
_version_ | 1783245882789986304 |
---|---|
author | Moryoussef, Frédérick Sportes, Adrien Leblanc, Sarah Bachet, Jean Baptiste Chaussade, Stanislas Prat, Frédéric |
author_facet | Moryoussef, Frédérick Sportes, Adrien Leblanc, Sarah Bachet, Jean Baptiste Chaussade, Stanislas Prat, Frédéric |
author_sort | Moryoussef, Frédérick |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Results of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUBD) are unknown in case of proximal stricture. The aim is to assess clinical outcomes of EUBD in patients with malignant hilar obstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing EUBD with hilar strictures were prospectively included. Primary outcome was clinical success at 7 and 30 days (defined by 50% bilirubin decrease). Secondary outcomes were technical success, procedure-related complications, length of hospital stay, reintervention rate, survival and chemotherapy administration. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with a mean age of 68.8 years were included. On 15 classable stenosis, 7 (47%) were noted Bismuth I–II, 7 (47%) Bismuth III, and 1 (6.7%) Bismuth IV. Reasons for EUBD were surgically modified anatomy in 10 patients (55.6%), impassable stricture at ERCP in 7 (38.9%) and duodenal obstruction in 1 (5.6%). Only hepaticogastrostomy was performed. Clinical success was at day 7 and 30 respectively 72.2% and 68.8%. Technical success was 94%. Complications occurred in 3 (16.7%) patients. Median (range) length of hospital stay was 10 (6–35) days. Reintervention rate was 16.7%. Median (range) survival was 79 (5–390) days. Chemotherapy was possible in 10 (55.6%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: EUBD is feasible for hilar obstruction for surgically altered anatomy or after ERCP failure. Clinical outcome is satisfactory when considering underlying advanced disease, allowing chemotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5484435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54844352017-08-12 Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction? Moryoussef, Frédérick Sportes, Adrien Leblanc, Sarah Bachet, Jean Baptiste Chaussade, Stanislas Prat, Frédéric Therap Adv Gastroenterol Original Research BACKGROUND: Results of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUBD) are unknown in case of proximal stricture. The aim is to assess clinical outcomes of EUBD in patients with malignant hilar obstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing EUBD with hilar strictures were prospectively included. Primary outcome was clinical success at 7 and 30 days (defined by 50% bilirubin decrease). Secondary outcomes were technical success, procedure-related complications, length of hospital stay, reintervention rate, survival and chemotherapy administration. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with a mean age of 68.8 years were included. On 15 classable stenosis, 7 (47%) were noted Bismuth I–II, 7 (47%) Bismuth III, and 1 (6.7%) Bismuth IV. Reasons for EUBD were surgically modified anatomy in 10 patients (55.6%), impassable stricture at ERCP in 7 (38.9%) and duodenal obstruction in 1 (5.6%). Only hepaticogastrostomy was performed. Clinical success was at day 7 and 30 respectively 72.2% and 68.8%. Technical success was 94%. Complications occurred in 3 (16.7%) patients. Median (range) length of hospital stay was 10 (6–35) days. Reintervention rate was 16.7%. Median (range) survival was 79 (5–390) days. Chemotherapy was possible in 10 (55.6%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: EUBD is feasible for hilar obstruction for surgically altered anatomy or after ERCP failure. Clinical outcome is satisfactory when considering underlying advanced disease, allowing chemotherapy. SAGE Publications 2017-04-20 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5484435/ /pubmed/28804514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756283X17702614 Text en © The Author(s), 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Moryoussef, Frédérick Sportes, Adrien Leblanc, Sarah Bachet, Jean Baptiste Chaussade, Stanislas Prat, Frédéric Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction? |
title | Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction? |
title_full | Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction? |
title_fullStr | Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction? |
title_short | Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction? |
title_sort | is eus-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28804514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756283X17702614 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moryousseffrederick iseusguideddrainageasuitablealternativetechniqueincaseofproximalbiliaryobstruction AT sportesadrien iseusguideddrainageasuitablealternativetechniqueincaseofproximalbiliaryobstruction AT leblancsarah iseusguideddrainageasuitablealternativetechniqueincaseofproximalbiliaryobstruction AT bachetjeanbaptiste iseusguideddrainageasuitablealternativetechniqueincaseofproximalbiliaryobstruction AT chaussadestanislas iseusguideddrainageasuitablealternativetechniqueincaseofproximalbiliaryobstruction AT pratfrederic iseusguideddrainageasuitablealternativetechniqueincaseofproximalbiliaryobstruction |