Cargando…
The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy
The ability to speak and communicate with one’s voice is a unique human characteristic and is fundamental to many activities of daily living, such as talking on the phone and speaking to loved ones. When the larynx is removed during a total laryngectomy (TL), loss of voice can lead to a devastating...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28684925 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S133225 |
_version_ | 1783245905581834240 |
---|---|
author | Kaye, Rachel Tang, Christopher G Sinclair, Catherine F |
author_facet | Kaye, Rachel Tang, Christopher G Sinclair, Catherine F |
author_sort | Kaye, Rachel |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ability to speak and communicate with one’s voice is a unique human characteristic and is fundamental to many activities of daily living, such as talking on the phone and speaking to loved ones. When the larynx is removed during a total laryngectomy (TL), loss of voice can lead to a devastating decrease in a patient’s quality of life, and precipitate significant frustration over their inability to communicate with others effectively. Over the past 50 years there have been many advances in techniques of voice restoration after TL. Currently, there are three main methods of voice restoration: the electrolarynx, esophageal speech, and tracheoesophageal speech through a tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) with voice prosthesis. Although TEP voice is the current gold standard for vocal rehabilitation, a significant minority of patients cannot use or obtain TEP speech for various reasons. As such, the electrolarynx is a viable and useful alternative for these patients. This article will focus on voice restoration using an electrolarynx with the following objectives: 1) To provide an understanding of the importance of voice restoration after total laryngectomy. 2) To discuss how the electrolarynx may be used to restore voice following total laryngectomy. 3) To outline some of the current electrolarynx devices available, including their mechanism of action and limitations. 4) To compare pros and cons of electrolaryngeal speech to TEP and esophageal speech. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5484568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54845682017-07-06 The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy Kaye, Rachel Tang, Christopher G Sinclair, Catherine F Med Devices (Auckl) Review The ability to speak and communicate with one’s voice is a unique human characteristic and is fundamental to many activities of daily living, such as talking on the phone and speaking to loved ones. When the larynx is removed during a total laryngectomy (TL), loss of voice can lead to a devastating decrease in a patient’s quality of life, and precipitate significant frustration over their inability to communicate with others effectively. Over the past 50 years there have been many advances in techniques of voice restoration after TL. Currently, there are three main methods of voice restoration: the electrolarynx, esophageal speech, and tracheoesophageal speech through a tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) with voice prosthesis. Although TEP voice is the current gold standard for vocal rehabilitation, a significant minority of patients cannot use or obtain TEP speech for various reasons. As such, the electrolarynx is a viable and useful alternative for these patients. This article will focus on voice restoration using an electrolarynx with the following objectives: 1) To provide an understanding of the importance of voice restoration after total laryngectomy. 2) To discuss how the electrolarynx may be used to restore voice following total laryngectomy. 3) To outline some of the current electrolarynx devices available, including their mechanism of action and limitations. 4) To compare pros and cons of electrolaryngeal speech to TEP and esophageal speech. Dove Medical Press 2017-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5484568/ /pubmed/28684925 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S133225 Text en © 2017 Kaye et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Kaye, Rachel Tang, Christopher G Sinclair, Catherine F The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy |
title | The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy |
title_full | The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy |
title_fullStr | The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy |
title_short | The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy |
title_sort | electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28684925 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S133225 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kayerachel theelectrolarynxvoicerestorationaftertotallaryngectomy AT tangchristopherg theelectrolarynxvoicerestorationaftertotallaryngectomy AT sinclaircatherinef theelectrolarynxvoicerestorationaftertotallaryngectomy AT kayerachel electrolarynxvoicerestorationaftertotallaryngectomy AT tangchristopherg electrolarynxvoicerestorationaftertotallaryngectomy AT sinclaircatherinef electrolarynxvoicerestorationaftertotallaryngectomy |