Cargando…

The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy

The ability to speak and communicate with one’s voice is a unique human characteristic and is fundamental to many activities of daily living, such as talking on the phone and speaking to loved ones. When the larynx is removed during a total laryngectomy (TL), loss of voice can lead to a devastating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaye, Rachel, Tang, Christopher G, Sinclair, Catherine F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28684925
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S133225
_version_ 1783245905581834240
author Kaye, Rachel
Tang, Christopher G
Sinclair, Catherine F
author_facet Kaye, Rachel
Tang, Christopher G
Sinclair, Catherine F
author_sort Kaye, Rachel
collection PubMed
description The ability to speak and communicate with one’s voice is a unique human characteristic and is fundamental to many activities of daily living, such as talking on the phone and speaking to loved ones. When the larynx is removed during a total laryngectomy (TL), loss of voice can lead to a devastating decrease in a patient’s quality of life, and precipitate significant frustration over their inability to communicate with others effectively. Over the past 50 years there have been many advances in techniques of voice restoration after TL. Currently, there are three main methods of voice restoration: the electrolarynx, esophageal speech, and tracheoesophageal speech through a tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) with voice prosthesis. Although TEP voice is the current gold standard for vocal rehabilitation, a significant minority of patients cannot use or obtain TEP speech for various reasons. As such, the electrolarynx is a viable and useful alternative for these patients. This article will focus on voice restoration using an electrolarynx with the following objectives: 1) To provide an understanding of the importance of voice restoration after total laryngectomy. 2) To discuss how the electrolarynx may be used to restore voice following total laryngectomy. 3) To outline some of the current electrolarynx devices available, including their mechanism of action and limitations. 4) To compare pros and cons of electrolaryngeal speech to TEP and esophageal speech.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5484568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54845682017-07-06 The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy Kaye, Rachel Tang, Christopher G Sinclair, Catherine F Med Devices (Auckl) Review The ability to speak and communicate with one’s voice is a unique human characteristic and is fundamental to many activities of daily living, such as talking on the phone and speaking to loved ones. When the larynx is removed during a total laryngectomy (TL), loss of voice can lead to a devastating decrease in a patient’s quality of life, and precipitate significant frustration over their inability to communicate with others effectively. Over the past 50 years there have been many advances in techniques of voice restoration after TL. Currently, there are three main methods of voice restoration: the electrolarynx, esophageal speech, and tracheoesophageal speech through a tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) with voice prosthesis. Although TEP voice is the current gold standard for vocal rehabilitation, a significant minority of patients cannot use or obtain TEP speech for various reasons. As such, the electrolarynx is a viable and useful alternative for these patients. This article will focus on voice restoration using an electrolarynx with the following objectives: 1) To provide an understanding of the importance of voice restoration after total laryngectomy. 2) To discuss how the electrolarynx may be used to restore voice following total laryngectomy. 3) To outline some of the current electrolarynx devices available, including their mechanism of action and limitations. 4) To compare pros and cons of electrolaryngeal speech to TEP and esophageal speech. Dove Medical Press 2017-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5484568/ /pubmed/28684925 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S133225 Text en © 2017 Kaye et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Kaye, Rachel
Tang, Christopher G
Sinclair, Catherine F
The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy
title The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy
title_full The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy
title_fullStr The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy
title_full_unstemmed The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy
title_short The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy
title_sort electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28684925
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S133225
work_keys_str_mv AT kayerachel theelectrolarynxvoicerestorationaftertotallaryngectomy
AT tangchristopherg theelectrolarynxvoicerestorationaftertotallaryngectomy
AT sinclaircatherinef theelectrolarynxvoicerestorationaftertotallaryngectomy
AT kayerachel electrolarynxvoicerestorationaftertotallaryngectomy
AT tangchristopherg electrolarynxvoicerestorationaftertotallaryngectomy
AT sinclaircatherinef electrolarynxvoicerestorationaftertotallaryngectomy