Cargando…
Polygamy slows down population divergence in shorebirds
Sexual selection may act as a promotor of speciation since divergent mate choice and competition for mates can rapidly lead to reproductive isolation. Alternatively, sexual selection may also retard speciation since polygamous individuals can access additional mates by increased breeding dispersal....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.13212 |
_version_ | 1783245982485446656 |
---|---|
author | D'Urban Jackson, Josephine dos Remedios, Natalie Maher, Kathryn H. Zefania, Sama Haig, Susan Oyler‐McCance, Sara Blomqvist, Donald Burke, Terry Bruford, Michael W. Székely, Tamás Küpper, Clemens |
author_facet | D'Urban Jackson, Josephine dos Remedios, Natalie Maher, Kathryn H. Zefania, Sama Haig, Susan Oyler‐McCance, Sara Blomqvist, Donald Burke, Terry Bruford, Michael W. Székely, Tamás Küpper, Clemens |
author_sort | D'Urban Jackson, Josephine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sexual selection may act as a promotor of speciation since divergent mate choice and competition for mates can rapidly lead to reproductive isolation. Alternatively, sexual selection may also retard speciation since polygamous individuals can access additional mates by increased breeding dispersal. High breeding dispersal should hence increase gene flow and reduce diversification in polygamous species. Here, we test how polygamy predicts diversification in shorebirds using genetic differentiation and subspecies richness as proxies for population divergence. Examining microsatellite data from 79 populations in 10 plover species (Genus: Charadrius) we found that polygamous species display significantly less genetic structure and weaker isolation‐by‐distance effects than monogamous species. Consistent with this result, a comparative analysis including 136 shorebird species showed significantly fewer subspecies for polygamous than for monogamous species. By contrast, migratory behavior neither predicted genetic differentiation nor subspecies richness. Taken together, our results suggest that dispersal associated with polygamy may facilitate gene flow and limit population divergence. Therefore, intense sexual selection, as occurs in polygamous species, may act as a brake rather than an engine of speciation in shorebirds. We discuss alternative explanations for these results and call for further studies to understand the relationships between sexual selection, dispersal, and diversification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5484996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54849962017-07-10 Polygamy slows down population divergence in shorebirds D'Urban Jackson, Josephine dos Remedios, Natalie Maher, Kathryn H. Zefania, Sama Haig, Susan Oyler‐McCance, Sara Blomqvist, Donald Burke, Terry Bruford, Michael W. Székely, Tamás Küpper, Clemens Evolution Original Articles Sexual selection may act as a promotor of speciation since divergent mate choice and competition for mates can rapidly lead to reproductive isolation. Alternatively, sexual selection may also retard speciation since polygamous individuals can access additional mates by increased breeding dispersal. High breeding dispersal should hence increase gene flow and reduce diversification in polygamous species. Here, we test how polygamy predicts diversification in shorebirds using genetic differentiation and subspecies richness as proxies for population divergence. Examining microsatellite data from 79 populations in 10 plover species (Genus: Charadrius) we found that polygamous species display significantly less genetic structure and weaker isolation‐by‐distance effects than monogamous species. Consistent with this result, a comparative analysis including 136 shorebird species showed significantly fewer subspecies for polygamous than for monogamous species. By contrast, migratory behavior neither predicted genetic differentiation nor subspecies richness. Taken together, our results suggest that dispersal associated with polygamy may facilitate gene flow and limit population divergence. Therefore, intense sexual selection, as occurs in polygamous species, may act as a brake rather than an engine of speciation in shorebirds. We discuss alternative explanations for these results and call for further studies to understand the relationships between sexual selection, dispersal, and diversification. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-10 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5484996/ /pubmed/28233288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.13212 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Evolution published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Society for the Study of Evolution. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles D'Urban Jackson, Josephine dos Remedios, Natalie Maher, Kathryn H. Zefania, Sama Haig, Susan Oyler‐McCance, Sara Blomqvist, Donald Burke, Terry Bruford, Michael W. Székely, Tamás Küpper, Clemens Polygamy slows down population divergence in shorebirds |
title | Polygamy slows down population divergence in shorebirds |
title_full | Polygamy slows down population divergence in shorebirds |
title_fullStr | Polygamy slows down population divergence in shorebirds |
title_full_unstemmed | Polygamy slows down population divergence in shorebirds |
title_short | Polygamy slows down population divergence in shorebirds |
title_sort | polygamy slows down population divergence in shorebirds |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5484996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.13212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT durbanjacksonjosephine polygamyslowsdownpopulationdivergenceinshorebirds AT dosremediosnatalie polygamyslowsdownpopulationdivergenceinshorebirds AT maherkathrynh polygamyslowsdownpopulationdivergenceinshorebirds AT zefaniasama polygamyslowsdownpopulationdivergenceinshorebirds AT haigsusan polygamyslowsdownpopulationdivergenceinshorebirds AT oylermccancesara polygamyslowsdownpopulationdivergenceinshorebirds AT blomqvistdonald polygamyslowsdownpopulationdivergenceinshorebirds AT burketerry polygamyslowsdownpopulationdivergenceinshorebirds AT brufordmichaelw polygamyslowsdownpopulationdivergenceinshorebirds AT szekelytamas polygamyslowsdownpopulationdivergenceinshorebirds AT kupperclemens polygamyslowsdownpopulationdivergenceinshorebirds |