Cargando…

Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of collagen cross-linking (CXL) one year after treatment for keratoconus compared to no treatment by summarizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using a systematic review. METHODS: Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised, and the data were e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobashi, Hidenaga, Rong, Shi Song
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5485290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28691035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8145651
_version_ 1783246030746157056
author Kobashi, Hidenaga
Rong, Shi Song
author_facet Kobashi, Hidenaga
Rong, Shi Song
author_sort Kobashi, Hidenaga
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of collagen cross-linking (CXL) one year after treatment for keratoconus compared to no treatment by summarizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using a systematic review. METHODS: Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised, and the data were extracted by two independent authors. The outcome parameters included maximum keratometry (K(max)), corneal thickness at the thinnest point, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), spherical equivalent (SE) refraction, and cylindrical refraction one year after CXL. We compared the changes in the above parameters with the control group. RESULTS: We identified five RCTs involving 289 eyes that met the eligibility criteria for this systematic review. The changes in BSCVA from baseline to one year exhibited a significant difference between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for changes in corneal thickness and cylindrical refraction. We did not conduct a meta-analysis in K(max), UCVA, and SE refraction because their I(2) values were greater than 50%. CONCLUSIONS: According to the systematic review, CXL may be effective in halting the progression of keratoconus for one year under certain conditions, although evidence is limited due to the significant heterogeneity and paucity of RCTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5485290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54852902017-07-09 Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review Kobashi, Hidenaga Rong, Shi Song Biomed Res Int Review Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of collagen cross-linking (CXL) one year after treatment for keratoconus compared to no treatment by summarizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using a systematic review. METHODS: Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised, and the data were extracted by two independent authors. The outcome parameters included maximum keratometry (K(max)), corneal thickness at the thinnest point, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), spherical equivalent (SE) refraction, and cylindrical refraction one year after CXL. We compared the changes in the above parameters with the control group. RESULTS: We identified five RCTs involving 289 eyes that met the eligibility criteria for this systematic review. The changes in BSCVA from baseline to one year exhibited a significant difference between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for changes in corneal thickness and cylindrical refraction. We did not conduct a meta-analysis in K(max), UCVA, and SE refraction because their I(2) values were greater than 50%. CONCLUSIONS: According to the systematic review, CXL may be effective in halting the progression of keratoconus for one year under certain conditions, although evidence is limited due to the significant heterogeneity and paucity of RCTs. Hindawi 2017 2017-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5485290/ /pubmed/28691035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8145651 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hidenaga Kobashi and Shi Song Rong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Kobashi, Hidenaga
Rong, Shi Song
Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review
title Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review
title_full Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review
title_short Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review
title_sort corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5485290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28691035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8145651
work_keys_str_mv AT kobashihidenaga cornealcollagencrosslinkingforkeratoconussystematicreview
AT rongshisong cornealcollagencrosslinkingforkeratoconussystematicreview