Cargando…
Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of collagen cross-linking (CXL) one year after treatment for keratoconus compared to no treatment by summarizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using a systematic review. METHODS: Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised, and the data were e...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5485290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28691035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8145651 |
_version_ | 1783246030746157056 |
---|---|
author | Kobashi, Hidenaga Rong, Shi Song |
author_facet | Kobashi, Hidenaga Rong, Shi Song |
author_sort | Kobashi, Hidenaga |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of collagen cross-linking (CXL) one year after treatment for keratoconus compared to no treatment by summarizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using a systematic review. METHODS: Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised, and the data were extracted by two independent authors. The outcome parameters included maximum keratometry (K(max)), corneal thickness at the thinnest point, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), spherical equivalent (SE) refraction, and cylindrical refraction one year after CXL. We compared the changes in the above parameters with the control group. RESULTS: We identified five RCTs involving 289 eyes that met the eligibility criteria for this systematic review. The changes in BSCVA from baseline to one year exhibited a significant difference between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for changes in corneal thickness and cylindrical refraction. We did not conduct a meta-analysis in K(max), UCVA, and SE refraction because their I(2) values were greater than 50%. CONCLUSIONS: According to the systematic review, CXL may be effective in halting the progression of keratoconus for one year under certain conditions, although evidence is limited due to the significant heterogeneity and paucity of RCTs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5485290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54852902017-07-09 Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review Kobashi, Hidenaga Rong, Shi Song Biomed Res Int Review Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of collagen cross-linking (CXL) one year after treatment for keratoconus compared to no treatment by summarizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using a systematic review. METHODS: Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised, and the data were extracted by two independent authors. The outcome parameters included maximum keratometry (K(max)), corneal thickness at the thinnest point, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), spherical equivalent (SE) refraction, and cylindrical refraction one year after CXL. We compared the changes in the above parameters with the control group. RESULTS: We identified five RCTs involving 289 eyes that met the eligibility criteria for this systematic review. The changes in BSCVA from baseline to one year exhibited a significant difference between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for changes in corneal thickness and cylindrical refraction. We did not conduct a meta-analysis in K(max), UCVA, and SE refraction because their I(2) values were greater than 50%. CONCLUSIONS: According to the systematic review, CXL may be effective in halting the progression of keratoconus for one year under certain conditions, although evidence is limited due to the significant heterogeneity and paucity of RCTs. Hindawi 2017 2017-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5485290/ /pubmed/28691035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8145651 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hidenaga Kobashi and Shi Song Rong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Kobashi, Hidenaga Rong, Shi Song Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review |
title | Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review |
title_full | Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review |
title_short | Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review |
title_sort | corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5485290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28691035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8145651 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kobashihidenaga cornealcollagencrosslinkingforkeratoconussystematicreview AT rongshisong cornealcollagencrosslinkingforkeratoconussystematicreview |