Prevalence and predictors of ventriculo-atrial conduction in structurally normal hearts

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of ventriculo-atrial (VA) conduction varies from 20% to 90%, depending on the population studied (Militianu et al., 1997; Inoue et al., 1985; Kazmierczak et al., 1993; Ciemniewski et al., 1990; Hayes and Furman, 1983; Westveer et al., 1984). This wide range is mostly based on studies done in patients with implanted devices or impaired atrioventricular conduction. However, the prevalence of VA conduction in structurally normal heart has not been well documented till date. OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence and identify predictors of retrograde conduction via the His-Purkinje system and AV node in structurally normal hearts. METHODS: We included 54 consecutive adults without structural heart disease who underwent electrophysiological (EP) study for various tachycardias. The basic parameters including PR, AH and HV intervals, atrioventricular Wenckebach point (AVWP) and anterograde effective refractory period (ERP) of atrioventricular node (AVNERP), were measured after ablation. The VA conduction was assessed basally and if absent, after isoprenaline. The VA Wenckebach point (VAWP) and retrograde ERP(VAERP) were recorded in patients showing VA conduction. RESULTS: The mean age was 37.1 ± 12.6years. Twenty five (46%) of the patients were men. VA conduction was present in 30 (55%) patients at baseline. Of the remaining 24 patients, 18 (34%) showed VA conduction after isoprenaline. Only 6 (11%) patients failed to reveal VA conduction even after adequate response to isoprenaline. Amongst all clinical and EP variables analysed, only the HV interval was shorter (p < 0.01) in patients with VA conduction. CONCLUSION: In structurally normal hearts, VA conduction was present at baseline in 55% of patients. Isoprenaline unmasked VA conduction in an additional 34% of the subjects. The HV interval was longer in patients without VA conduction.