Cargando…

Prokinetics for the treatment of functional dyspepsia: Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Controversies persist regarding the effect of prokinetics for the treatment of functional dyspepsia (FD). This study aimed to assess the comparative efficacy of prokinetic agents for the treatment of FD. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of prokinetics for the treatment of FD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Young Joo, Bang, Chang Seok, Baik, Gwang Ho, Park, Tae Young, Shin, Suk Pyo, Suk, Ki Tae, Kim, Dong Joon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5485548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28651565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0639-0
_version_ 1783246088520597504
author Yang, Young Joo
Bang, Chang Seok
Baik, Gwang Ho
Park, Tae Young
Shin, Suk Pyo
Suk, Ki Tae
Kim, Dong Joon
author_facet Yang, Young Joo
Bang, Chang Seok
Baik, Gwang Ho
Park, Tae Young
Shin, Suk Pyo
Suk, Ki Tae
Kim, Dong Joon
author_sort Yang, Young Joo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Controversies persist regarding the effect of prokinetics for the treatment of functional dyspepsia (FD). This study aimed to assess the comparative efficacy of prokinetic agents for the treatment of FD. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of prokinetics for the treatment of FD were identified from core databases. Symptom response rates were extracted and analyzed using odds ratios (ORs). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method in WinBUGS and NetMetaXL. RESULTS: In total, 25 RCTs, which included 4473 patients with FD who were treated with 6 different prokinetics or placebo, were identified and analyzed. Metoclopramide showed the best surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability (92.5%), followed by trimebutine (74.5%) and mosapride (63.3%). However, the therapeutic efficacy of metoclopramide was not significantly different from that of trimebutine (OR:1.32, 95% credible interval: 0.27–6.06), mosapride (OR: 1.99, 95% credible interval: 0.87–4.72), or domperidone (OR: 2.04, 95% credible interval: 0.92–4.60). Metoclopramide showed better efficacy than itopride (OR: 2.79, 95% credible interval: 1.29–6.21) and acotiamide (OR: 3.07, 95% credible interval: 1.43–6.75). Domperidone (SUCRA probability 62.9%) showed better efficacy than itopride (OR: 1.37, 95% credible interval: 1.07–1.77) and acotiamide (OR: 1.51, 95% credible interval: 1.04–2.18). CONCLUSIONS: Metoclopramide, trimebutine, mosapride, and domperidone showed better efficacy for the treatment of FD than itopride or acotiamide. Considering the adverse events related to metoclopramide or domperidone, the short-term use of these agents or the alternative use of trimebutine or mosapride could be recommended for the symptomatic relief of FD. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12876-017-0639-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5485548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54855482017-06-30 Prokinetics for the treatment of functional dyspepsia: Bayesian network meta-analysis Yang, Young Joo Bang, Chang Seok Baik, Gwang Ho Park, Tae Young Shin, Suk Pyo Suk, Ki Tae Kim, Dong Joon BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Controversies persist regarding the effect of prokinetics for the treatment of functional dyspepsia (FD). This study aimed to assess the comparative efficacy of prokinetic agents for the treatment of FD. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of prokinetics for the treatment of FD were identified from core databases. Symptom response rates were extracted and analyzed using odds ratios (ORs). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method in WinBUGS and NetMetaXL. RESULTS: In total, 25 RCTs, which included 4473 patients with FD who were treated with 6 different prokinetics or placebo, were identified and analyzed. Metoclopramide showed the best surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability (92.5%), followed by trimebutine (74.5%) and mosapride (63.3%). However, the therapeutic efficacy of metoclopramide was not significantly different from that of trimebutine (OR:1.32, 95% credible interval: 0.27–6.06), mosapride (OR: 1.99, 95% credible interval: 0.87–4.72), or domperidone (OR: 2.04, 95% credible interval: 0.92–4.60). Metoclopramide showed better efficacy than itopride (OR: 2.79, 95% credible interval: 1.29–6.21) and acotiamide (OR: 3.07, 95% credible interval: 1.43–6.75). Domperidone (SUCRA probability 62.9%) showed better efficacy than itopride (OR: 1.37, 95% credible interval: 1.07–1.77) and acotiamide (OR: 1.51, 95% credible interval: 1.04–2.18). CONCLUSIONS: Metoclopramide, trimebutine, mosapride, and domperidone showed better efficacy for the treatment of FD than itopride or acotiamide. Considering the adverse events related to metoclopramide or domperidone, the short-term use of these agents or the alternative use of trimebutine or mosapride could be recommended for the symptomatic relief of FD. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12876-017-0639-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5485548/ /pubmed/28651565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0639-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Young Joo
Bang, Chang Seok
Baik, Gwang Ho
Park, Tae Young
Shin, Suk Pyo
Suk, Ki Tae
Kim, Dong Joon
Prokinetics for the treatment of functional dyspepsia: Bayesian network meta-analysis
title Prokinetics for the treatment of functional dyspepsia: Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full Prokinetics for the treatment of functional dyspepsia: Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prokinetics for the treatment of functional dyspepsia: Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prokinetics for the treatment of functional dyspepsia: Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_short Prokinetics for the treatment of functional dyspepsia: Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_sort prokinetics for the treatment of functional dyspepsia: bayesian network meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5485548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28651565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0639-0
work_keys_str_mv AT yangyoungjoo prokineticsforthetreatmentoffunctionaldyspepsiabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT bangchangseok prokineticsforthetreatmentoffunctionaldyspepsiabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT baikgwangho prokineticsforthetreatmentoffunctionaldyspepsiabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT parktaeyoung prokineticsforthetreatmentoffunctionaldyspepsiabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT shinsukpyo prokineticsforthetreatmentoffunctionaldyspepsiabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT sukkitae prokineticsforthetreatmentoffunctionaldyspepsiabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT kimdongjoon prokineticsforthetreatmentoffunctionaldyspepsiabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis