Cargando…

Dynamic In Vivo Profiling of DNA Damage and Repair after Radiotherapy Using Canine Patients as a Model

Time resolved data of DNA damage and repair after radiotherapy elucidates the relation between damage, repair, and cell survival. While well characterized in vitro, little is known about the time-course of DNA damage response in tumors sampled from individual patients. Kinetics of DNA damage after r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schulz, Nadine, Chaachouay, Hassan, Nytko, Katarzyna J., Weyland, Mathias S., Roos, Malgorzata, Füchslin, Rudolf M., Guscetti, Franco, Scheidegger, Stephan, Rohrer Bley, Carla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5485999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28587165
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061176
_version_ 1783246176117587968
author Schulz, Nadine
Chaachouay, Hassan
Nytko, Katarzyna J.
Weyland, Mathias S.
Roos, Malgorzata
Füchslin, Rudolf M.
Guscetti, Franco
Scheidegger, Stephan
Rohrer Bley, Carla
author_facet Schulz, Nadine
Chaachouay, Hassan
Nytko, Katarzyna J.
Weyland, Mathias S.
Roos, Malgorzata
Füchslin, Rudolf M.
Guscetti, Franco
Scheidegger, Stephan
Rohrer Bley, Carla
author_sort Schulz, Nadine
collection PubMed
description Time resolved data of DNA damage and repair after radiotherapy elucidates the relation between damage, repair, and cell survival. While well characterized in vitro, little is known about the time-course of DNA damage response in tumors sampled from individual patients. Kinetics of DNA damage after radiotherapy was assessed in eight dogs using repeated in vivo samples of tumor and co-irradiated normal tissue analyzed with comet assay and phosphorylated H2AX (γH2AX) immunohistochemistry. In vivo results were then compared (in silico) with a dynamic mathematical model for DNA damage formation and repair. Maximum %DNA in tail was observed at 15–60 min after irradiation, with a rapid decrease. Time-courses of γH2AX-foci paralleled these findings with a small time delay and were not influenced by covariates. The evolutionary parameter search based on %DNA in tail revealed a good fit of the DNA repair model to in vivo data for pooled sarcoma time-courses, but fits for individual sarcoma time-courses suffer from the heterogeneous nature of the in vivo data. It was possible to follow dynamics of comet tail intensity and γH2AX-foci during a course of radiation using a minimally invasive approach. DNA repair can be quantitatively investigated as time-courses of individual patients by integrating this resulting data into a dynamic mathematical model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5485999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54859992017-06-29 Dynamic In Vivo Profiling of DNA Damage and Repair after Radiotherapy Using Canine Patients as a Model Schulz, Nadine Chaachouay, Hassan Nytko, Katarzyna J. Weyland, Mathias S. Roos, Malgorzata Füchslin, Rudolf M. Guscetti, Franco Scheidegger, Stephan Rohrer Bley, Carla Int J Mol Sci Article Time resolved data of DNA damage and repair after radiotherapy elucidates the relation between damage, repair, and cell survival. While well characterized in vitro, little is known about the time-course of DNA damage response in tumors sampled from individual patients. Kinetics of DNA damage after radiotherapy was assessed in eight dogs using repeated in vivo samples of tumor and co-irradiated normal tissue analyzed with comet assay and phosphorylated H2AX (γH2AX) immunohistochemistry. In vivo results were then compared (in silico) with a dynamic mathematical model for DNA damage formation and repair. Maximum %DNA in tail was observed at 15–60 min after irradiation, with a rapid decrease. Time-courses of γH2AX-foci paralleled these findings with a small time delay and were not influenced by covariates. The evolutionary parameter search based on %DNA in tail revealed a good fit of the DNA repair model to in vivo data for pooled sarcoma time-courses, but fits for individual sarcoma time-courses suffer from the heterogeneous nature of the in vivo data. It was possible to follow dynamics of comet tail intensity and γH2AX-foci during a course of radiation using a minimally invasive approach. DNA repair can be quantitatively investigated as time-courses of individual patients by integrating this resulting data into a dynamic mathematical model. MDPI 2017-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5485999/ /pubmed/28587165 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061176 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schulz, Nadine
Chaachouay, Hassan
Nytko, Katarzyna J.
Weyland, Mathias S.
Roos, Malgorzata
Füchslin, Rudolf M.
Guscetti, Franco
Scheidegger, Stephan
Rohrer Bley, Carla
Dynamic In Vivo Profiling of DNA Damage and Repair after Radiotherapy Using Canine Patients as a Model
title Dynamic In Vivo Profiling of DNA Damage and Repair after Radiotherapy Using Canine Patients as a Model
title_full Dynamic In Vivo Profiling of DNA Damage and Repair after Radiotherapy Using Canine Patients as a Model
title_fullStr Dynamic In Vivo Profiling of DNA Damage and Repair after Radiotherapy Using Canine Patients as a Model
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic In Vivo Profiling of DNA Damage and Repair after Radiotherapy Using Canine Patients as a Model
title_short Dynamic In Vivo Profiling of DNA Damage and Repair after Radiotherapy Using Canine Patients as a Model
title_sort dynamic in vivo profiling of dna damage and repair after radiotherapy using canine patients as a model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5485999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28587165
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061176
work_keys_str_mv AT schulznadine dynamicinvivoprofilingofdnadamageandrepairafterradiotherapyusingcaninepatientsasamodel
AT chaachouayhassan dynamicinvivoprofilingofdnadamageandrepairafterradiotherapyusingcaninepatientsasamodel
AT nytkokatarzynaj dynamicinvivoprofilingofdnadamageandrepairafterradiotherapyusingcaninepatientsasamodel
AT weylandmathiass dynamicinvivoprofilingofdnadamageandrepairafterradiotherapyusingcaninepatientsasamodel
AT roosmalgorzata dynamicinvivoprofilingofdnadamageandrepairafterradiotherapyusingcaninepatientsasamodel
AT fuchslinrudolfm dynamicinvivoprofilingofdnadamageandrepairafterradiotherapyusingcaninepatientsasamodel
AT guscettifranco dynamicinvivoprofilingofdnadamageandrepairafterradiotherapyusingcaninepatientsasamodel
AT scheideggerstephan dynamicinvivoprofilingofdnadamageandrepairafterradiotherapyusingcaninepatientsasamodel
AT rohrerbleycarla dynamicinvivoprofilingofdnadamageandrepairafterradiotherapyusingcaninepatientsasamodel