Cargando…

Comparing Proteolytic Fingerprints of Antigen-Presenting Cells during Allergen Processing

Endolysosomal processing has a critical influence on immunogenicity as well as immune polarization of protein antigens. In industrialized countries, allergies affect around 25% of the population. For the rational design of protein-based allergy therapeutics for immunotherapy, a good knowledge of T c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hofer, Heidi, Weidinger, Tamara, Briza, Peter, Asam, Claudia, Wolf, Martin, Twaroch, Teresa E., Stolz, Frank, Neubauer, Angela, Dall, Elfriede, Hammerl, Peter, Jacquet, Alain, Wallner, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594355
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061225
_version_ 1783246188438355968
author Hofer, Heidi
Weidinger, Tamara
Briza, Peter
Asam, Claudia
Wolf, Martin
Twaroch, Teresa E.
Stolz, Frank
Neubauer, Angela
Dall, Elfriede
Hammerl, Peter
Jacquet, Alain
Wallner, Michael
author_facet Hofer, Heidi
Weidinger, Tamara
Briza, Peter
Asam, Claudia
Wolf, Martin
Twaroch, Teresa E.
Stolz, Frank
Neubauer, Angela
Dall, Elfriede
Hammerl, Peter
Jacquet, Alain
Wallner, Michael
author_sort Hofer, Heidi
collection PubMed
description Endolysosomal processing has a critical influence on immunogenicity as well as immune polarization of protein antigens. In industrialized countries, allergies affect around 25% of the population. For the rational design of protein-based allergy therapeutics for immunotherapy, a good knowledge of T cell-reactive regions on allergens is required. Thus, we sought to analyze endolysosomal degradation patterns of inhalant allergens. Four major allergens from ragweed, birch, as well as house dust mites were produced as recombinant proteins. Endolysosomal proteases were purified by differential centrifugation from dendritic cells, macrophages, and B cells, and combined with allergens for proteolytic processing. Thereafter, endolysosomal proteolysis was monitored by protein gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. We found that the overall proteolytic activity of specific endolysosomal fractions differed substantially, whereas the degradation patterns of the four model allergens obtained with the different proteases were extremely similar. Moreover, previously identified T cell epitopes were assigned to endolysosomal peptides and indeed showed a good overlap with known T cell epitopes for all four candidate allergens. Thus, we propose that the degradome assay can be used as a predictor to determine antigenic peptides as potential T cell epitopes, which will help in the rational design of protein-based allergy vaccine candidates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5486048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54860482017-06-29 Comparing Proteolytic Fingerprints of Antigen-Presenting Cells during Allergen Processing Hofer, Heidi Weidinger, Tamara Briza, Peter Asam, Claudia Wolf, Martin Twaroch, Teresa E. Stolz, Frank Neubauer, Angela Dall, Elfriede Hammerl, Peter Jacquet, Alain Wallner, Michael Int J Mol Sci Article Endolysosomal processing has a critical influence on immunogenicity as well as immune polarization of protein antigens. In industrialized countries, allergies affect around 25% of the population. For the rational design of protein-based allergy therapeutics for immunotherapy, a good knowledge of T cell-reactive regions on allergens is required. Thus, we sought to analyze endolysosomal degradation patterns of inhalant allergens. Four major allergens from ragweed, birch, as well as house dust mites were produced as recombinant proteins. Endolysosomal proteases were purified by differential centrifugation from dendritic cells, macrophages, and B cells, and combined with allergens for proteolytic processing. Thereafter, endolysosomal proteolysis was monitored by protein gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. We found that the overall proteolytic activity of specific endolysosomal fractions differed substantially, whereas the degradation patterns of the four model allergens obtained with the different proteases were extremely similar. Moreover, previously identified T cell epitopes were assigned to endolysosomal peptides and indeed showed a good overlap with known T cell epitopes for all four candidate allergens. Thus, we propose that the degradome assay can be used as a predictor to determine antigenic peptides as potential T cell epitopes, which will help in the rational design of protein-based allergy vaccine candidates. MDPI 2017-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5486048/ /pubmed/28594355 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061225 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hofer, Heidi
Weidinger, Tamara
Briza, Peter
Asam, Claudia
Wolf, Martin
Twaroch, Teresa E.
Stolz, Frank
Neubauer, Angela
Dall, Elfriede
Hammerl, Peter
Jacquet, Alain
Wallner, Michael
Comparing Proteolytic Fingerprints of Antigen-Presenting Cells during Allergen Processing
title Comparing Proteolytic Fingerprints of Antigen-Presenting Cells during Allergen Processing
title_full Comparing Proteolytic Fingerprints of Antigen-Presenting Cells during Allergen Processing
title_fullStr Comparing Proteolytic Fingerprints of Antigen-Presenting Cells during Allergen Processing
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Proteolytic Fingerprints of Antigen-Presenting Cells during Allergen Processing
title_short Comparing Proteolytic Fingerprints of Antigen-Presenting Cells during Allergen Processing
title_sort comparing proteolytic fingerprints of antigen-presenting cells during allergen processing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594355
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061225
work_keys_str_mv AT hoferheidi comparingproteolyticfingerprintsofantigenpresentingcellsduringallergenprocessing
AT weidingertamara comparingproteolyticfingerprintsofantigenpresentingcellsduringallergenprocessing
AT brizapeter comparingproteolyticfingerprintsofantigenpresentingcellsduringallergenprocessing
AT asamclaudia comparingproteolyticfingerprintsofantigenpresentingcellsduringallergenprocessing
AT wolfmartin comparingproteolyticfingerprintsofantigenpresentingcellsduringallergenprocessing
AT twarochteresae comparingproteolyticfingerprintsofantigenpresentingcellsduringallergenprocessing
AT stolzfrank comparingproteolyticfingerprintsofantigenpresentingcellsduringallergenprocessing
AT neubauerangela comparingproteolyticfingerprintsofantigenpresentingcellsduringallergenprocessing
AT dallelfriede comparingproteolyticfingerprintsofantigenpresentingcellsduringallergenprocessing
AT hammerlpeter comparingproteolyticfingerprintsofantigenpresentingcellsduringallergenprocessing
AT jacquetalain comparingproteolyticfingerprintsofantigenpresentingcellsduringallergenprocessing
AT wallnermichael comparingproteolyticfingerprintsofantigenpresentingcellsduringallergenprocessing