Cargando…
Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges
Ultraviolet (UV) is one of the environmental pathogenic factors causing skin damage. Aiming to assess the risk of face skin exposure to UV irradiance from different rotation angles, a rotating model was used to monitor the exposure of the skin on the face to UV irradiance, with skin damage action sp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28587318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060606 |
_version_ | 1783246230709600256 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Fang Gao, Qian Deng, Yan Chen, Rentong Liu, Yang |
author_facet | Wang, Fang Gao, Qian Deng, Yan Chen, Rentong Liu, Yang |
author_sort | Wang, Fang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ultraviolet (UV) is one of the environmental pathogenic factors causing skin damage. Aiming to assess the risk of face skin exposure to UV irradiance from different rotation angles, a rotating model was used to monitor the exposure of the skin on the face to UV irradiance, with skin damage action spectra used to determine the biologically effective UV irradiance (UVBE(skin)) and UVBE(skin) radiant exposure (HBE(skin)) causing skin damage. The results indicate that the UVBE(skin) is directly influenced by variations in rotation angles. A significant decrease of approximately 52.70% and 52.10% in UVBE(skin) was found when the cheek and nose measurement sites was rotated from 0° to 90°, while a decrease of approximately 62.70% was shown when the forehead measurement sites was rotated from an angle of 0° to 108°. When HBE(skin) was compared to the exposure limits (ELs; 30 J·m(−2)), the maximum relative risk ratios (RR) for cheek, nose, and forehead were found to be approximately 2.01, 2.40, and 2.90, respectively, which were all measured at a rotation angle of 0°. The maximal increase in the percentage of the average HBE(skin) for rotation angles of 60°, 120°, 180°, and 360° facing the sun to ELs were found to be approximately 62.10%, 52.72%, 43.43%, and 26.27% for the cheek; approximately 130.61%, 109.68%, 86.43%, and 50.06% for the nose; and approximately 178.61%, 159.19%, 134.38%, and 83.41% for the forehead, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5486292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54862922017-06-30 Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges Wang, Fang Gao, Qian Deng, Yan Chen, Rentong Liu, Yang Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Ultraviolet (UV) is one of the environmental pathogenic factors causing skin damage. Aiming to assess the risk of face skin exposure to UV irradiance from different rotation angles, a rotating model was used to monitor the exposure of the skin on the face to UV irradiance, with skin damage action spectra used to determine the biologically effective UV irradiance (UVBE(skin)) and UVBE(skin) radiant exposure (HBE(skin)) causing skin damage. The results indicate that the UVBE(skin) is directly influenced by variations in rotation angles. A significant decrease of approximately 52.70% and 52.10% in UVBE(skin) was found when the cheek and nose measurement sites was rotated from 0° to 90°, while a decrease of approximately 62.70% was shown when the forehead measurement sites was rotated from an angle of 0° to 108°. When HBE(skin) was compared to the exposure limits (ELs; 30 J·m(−2)), the maximum relative risk ratios (RR) for cheek, nose, and forehead were found to be approximately 2.01, 2.40, and 2.90, respectively, which were all measured at a rotation angle of 0°. The maximal increase in the percentage of the average HBE(skin) for rotation angles of 60°, 120°, 180°, and 360° facing the sun to ELs were found to be approximately 62.10%, 52.72%, 43.43%, and 26.27% for the cheek; approximately 130.61%, 109.68%, 86.43%, and 50.06% for the nose; and approximately 178.61%, 159.19%, 134.38%, and 83.41% for the forehead, respectively. MDPI 2017-06-06 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5486292/ /pubmed/28587318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060606 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Fang Gao, Qian Deng, Yan Chen, Rentong Liu, Yang Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges |
title | Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges |
title_full | Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges |
title_fullStr | Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges |
title_short | Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges |
title_sort | risk assessment of face skin exposure to uv irradiance from different rotation angle ranges |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28587318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060606 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangfang riskassessmentoffaceskinexposuretouvirradiancefromdifferentrotationangleranges AT gaoqian riskassessmentoffaceskinexposuretouvirradiancefromdifferentrotationangleranges AT dengyan riskassessmentoffaceskinexposuretouvirradiancefromdifferentrotationangleranges AT chenrentong riskassessmentoffaceskinexposuretouvirradiancefromdifferentrotationangleranges AT liuyang riskassessmentoffaceskinexposuretouvirradiancefromdifferentrotationangleranges |