Cargando…

Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges

Ultraviolet (UV) is one of the environmental pathogenic factors causing skin damage. Aiming to assess the risk of face skin exposure to UV irradiance from different rotation angles, a rotating model was used to monitor the exposure of the skin on the face to UV irradiance, with skin damage action sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Fang, Gao, Qian, Deng, Yan, Chen, Rentong, Liu, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28587318
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060606
_version_ 1783246230709600256
author Wang, Fang
Gao, Qian
Deng, Yan
Chen, Rentong
Liu, Yang
author_facet Wang, Fang
Gao, Qian
Deng, Yan
Chen, Rentong
Liu, Yang
author_sort Wang, Fang
collection PubMed
description Ultraviolet (UV) is one of the environmental pathogenic factors causing skin damage. Aiming to assess the risk of face skin exposure to UV irradiance from different rotation angles, a rotating model was used to monitor the exposure of the skin on the face to UV irradiance, with skin damage action spectra used to determine the biologically effective UV irradiance (UVBE(skin)) and UVBE(skin) radiant exposure (HBE(skin)) causing skin damage. The results indicate that the UVBE(skin) is directly influenced by variations in rotation angles. A significant decrease of approximately 52.70% and 52.10% in UVBE(skin) was found when the cheek and nose measurement sites was rotated from 0° to 90°, while a decrease of approximately 62.70% was shown when the forehead measurement sites was rotated from an angle of 0° to 108°. When HBE(skin) was compared to the exposure limits (ELs; 30 J·m(−2)), the maximum relative risk ratios (RR) for cheek, nose, and forehead were found to be approximately 2.01, 2.40, and 2.90, respectively, which were all measured at a rotation angle of 0°. The maximal increase in the percentage of the average HBE(skin) for rotation angles of 60°, 120°, 180°, and 360° facing the sun to ELs were found to be approximately 62.10%, 52.72%, 43.43%, and 26.27% for the cheek; approximately 130.61%, 109.68%, 86.43%, and 50.06% for the nose; and approximately 178.61%, 159.19%, 134.38%, and 83.41% for the forehead, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5486292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54862922017-06-30 Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges Wang, Fang Gao, Qian Deng, Yan Chen, Rentong Liu, Yang Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Ultraviolet (UV) is one of the environmental pathogenic factors causing skin damage. Aiming to assess the risk of face skin exposure to UV irradiance from different rotation angles, a rotating model was used to monitor the exposure of the skin on the face to UV irradiance, with skin damage action spectra used to determine the biologically effective UV irradiance (UVBE(skin)) and UVBE(skin) radiant exposure (HBE(skin)) causing skin damage. The results indicate that the UVBE(skin) is directly influenced by variations in rotation angles. A significant decrease of approximately 52.70% and 52.10% in UVBE(skin) was found when the cheek and nose measurement sites was rotated from 0° to 90°, while a decrease of approximately 62.70% was shown when the forehead measurement sites was rotated from an angle of 0° to 108°. When HBE(skin) was compared to the exposure limits (ELs; 30 J·m(−2)), the maximum relative risk ratios (RR) for cheek, nose, and forehead were found to be approximately 2.01, 2.40, and 2.90, respectively, which were all measured at a rotation angle of 0°. The maximal increase in the percentage of the average HBE(skin) for rotation angles of 60°, 120°, 180°, and 360° facing the sun to ELs were found to be approximately 62.10%, 52.72%, 43.43%, and 26.27% for the cheek; approximately 130.61%, 109.68%, 86.43%, and 50.06% for the nose; and approximately 178.61%, 159.19%, 134.38%, and 83.41% for the forehead, respectively. MDPI 2017-06-06 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5486292/ /pubmed/28587318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060606 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Fang
Gao, Qian
Deng, Yan
Chen, Rentong
Liu, Yang
Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges
title Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges
title_full Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges
title_fullStr Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges
title_full_unstemmed Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges
title_short Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges
title_sort risk assessment of face skin exposure to uv irradiance from different rotation angle ranges
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28587318
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060606
work_keys_str_mv AT wangfang riskassessmentoffaceskinexposuretouvirradiancefromdifferentrotationangleranges
AT gaoqian riskassessmentoffaceskinexposuretouvirradiancefromdifferentrotationangleranges
AT dengyan riskassessmentoffaceskinexposuretouvirradiancefromdifferentrotationangleranges
AT chenrentong riskassessmentoffaceskinexposuretouvirradiancefromdifferentrotationangleranges
AT liuyang riskassessmentoffaceskinexposuretouvirradiancefromdifferentrotationangleranges