Cargando…

RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies?

An implicit assumption of risk perception studies is that concerns expressed in questionnaires reflect concerns in everyday life. The aim of the present study is to check this assumption, i.e., the extrapolability of risk perceptions expressed in a survey, to risk perceptions in everyday life. To th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiedemann, Peter M., Freudenstein, Frederik, Böhmert, Christoph, Wiart, Joe, Croft, Rodney J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594366
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060620
_version_ 1783246234080772096
author Wiedemann, Peter M.
Freudenstein, Frederik
Böhmert, Christoph
Wiart, Joe
Croft, Rodney J.
author_facet Wiedemann, Peter M.
Freudenstein, Frederik
Böhmert, Christoph
Wiart, Joe
Croft, Rodney J.
author_sort Wiedemann, Peter M.
collection PubMed
description An implicit assumption of risk perception studies is that concerns expressed in questionnaires reflect concerns in everyday life. The aim of the present study is to check this assumption, i.e., the extrapolability of risk perceptions expressed in a survey, to risk perceptions in everyday life. To that end, risk perceptions were measured by a multidimensional approach. In addition to the traditional focus on measuring the magnitude of risk perceptions, the thematic relevance (how often people think about a risk issue) and the discursive relevance (how often people think about or discuss a risk issue) of risk perceptions were also collected. Taking into account this extended view of risk perception, an online survey was conducted in six European countries with 2454 respondents, referring to radio frequency electromagnetic field (RF EMF) risk potentials from base stations, and access points, such as WiFi routers and cell phones. The findings reveal that the present study’s multidimensional approach to measuring risk perception provides a more differentiated understanding of RF EMF risk perception. High levels of concerns expressed in questionnaires do not automatically imply that these concerns are thematically relevant in everyday life. We use thematic relevance to distinguish between enduringly concerned (high concern according to both questionnaire and thematic relevance) and not enduringly concerned participants (high concern according to questionnaire but no thematic relevance). Furthermore, we provide data for the empirical value of this distinction: Compared to other participants, enduringly concerned subjects consider radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure to a greater extent as a moral and affective issue. They also see themselves as highly exposed to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. However, despite these differences, subjects with high levels of thematic relevance are nevertheless sensitive to exposure reduction as a means for improving the acceptance of base stations in their neighborhood. This underlines the value of exposure reduction for the acceptance of radio frequency electromagnetic field communication technologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5486306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54863062017-06-30 RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies? Wiedemann, Peter M. Freudenstein, Frederik Böhmert, Christoph Wiart, Joe Croft, Rodney J. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article An implicit assumption of risk perception studies is that concerns expressed in questionnaires reflect concerns in everyday life. The aim of the present study is to check this assumption, i.e., the extrapolability of risk perceptions expressed in a survey, to risk perceptions in everyday life. To that end, risk perceptions were measured by a multidimensional approach. In addition to the traditional focus on measuring the magnitude of risk perceptions, the thematic relevance (how often people think about a risk issue) and the discursive relevance (how often people think about or discuss a risk issue) of risk perceptions were also collected. Taking into account this extended view of risk perception, an online survey was conducted in six European countries with 2454 respondents, referring to radio frequency electromagnetic field (RF EMF) risk potentials from base stations, and access points, such as WiFi routers and cell phones. The findings reveal that the present study’s multidimensional approach to measuring risk perception provides a more differentiated understanding of RF EMF risk perception. High levels of concerns expressed in questionnaires do not automatically imply that these concerns are thematically relevant in everyday life. We use thematic relevance to distinguish between enduringly concerned (high concern according to both questionnaire and thematic relevance) and not enduringly concerned participants (high concern according to questionnaire but no thematic relevance). Furthermore, we provide data for the empirical value of this distinction: Compared to other participants, enduringly concerned subjects consider radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure to a greater extent as a moral and affective issue. They also see themselves as highly exposed to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. However, despite these differences, subjects with high levels of thematic relevance are nevertheless sensitive to exposure reduction as a means for improving the acceptance of base stations in their neighborhood. This underlines the value of exposure reduction for the acceptance of radio frequency electromagnetic field communication technologies. MDPI 2017-06-08 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5486306/ /pubmed/28594366 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060620 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wiedemann, Peter M.
Freudenstein, Frederik
Böhmert, Christoph
Wiart, Joe
Croft, Rodney J.
RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies?
title RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies?
title_full RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies?
title_fullStr RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies?
title_full_unstemmed RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies?
title_short RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies?
title_sort rf emf risk perception revisited: is the focus on concern sufficient for risk perception studies?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594366
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060620
work_keys_str_mv AT wiedemannpeterm rfemfriskperceptionrevisitedisthefocusonconcernsufficientforriskperceptionstudies
AT freudensteinfrederik rfemfriskperceptionrevisitedisthefocusonconcernsufficientforriskperceptionstudies
AT bohmertchristoph rfemfriskperceptionrevisitedisthefocusonconcernsufficientforriskperceptionstudies
AT wiartjoe rfemfriskperceptionrevisitedisthefocusonconcernsufficientforriskperceptionstudies
AT croftrodneyj rfemfriskperceptionrevisitedisthefocusonconcernsufficientforriskperceptionstudies