Cargando…
RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies?
An implicit assumption of risk perception studies is that concerns expressed in questionnaires reflect concerns in everyday life. The aim of the present study is to check this assumption, i.e., the extrapolability of risk perceptions expressed in a survey, to risk perceptions in everyday life. To th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594366 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060620 |
_version_ | 1783246234080772096 |
---|---|
author | Wiedemann, Peter M. Freudenstein, Frederik Böhmert, Christoph Wiart, Joe Croft, Rodney J. |
author_facet | Wiedemann, Peter M. Freudenstein, Frederik Böhmert, Christoph Wiart, Joe Croft, Rodney J. |
author_sort | Wiedemann, Peter M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | An implicit assumption of risk perception studies is that concerns expressed in questionnaires reflect concerns in everyday life. The aim of the present study is to check this assumption, i.e., the extrapolability of risk perceptions expressed in a survey, to risk perceptions in everyday life. To that end, risk perceptions were measured by a multidimensional approach. In addition to the traditional focus on measuring the magnitude of risk perceptions, the thematic relevance (how often people think about a risk issue) and the discursive relevance (how often people think about or discuss a risk issue) of risk perceptions were also collected. Taking into account this extended view of risk perception, an online survey was conducted in six European countries with 2454 respondents, referring to radio frequency electromagnetic field (RF EMF) risk potentials from base stations, and access points, such as WiFi routers and cell phones. The findings reveal that the present study’s multidimensional approach to measuring risk perception provides a more differentiated understanding of RF EMF risk perception. High levels of concerns expressed in questionnaires do not automatically imply that these concerns are thematically relevant in everyday life. We use thematic relevance to distinguish between enduringly concerned (high concern according to both questionnaire and thematic relevance) and not enduringly concerned participants (high concern according to questionnaire but no thematic relevance). Furthermore, we provide data for the empirical value of this distinction: Compared to other participants, enduringly concerned subjects consider radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure to a greater extent as a moral and affective issue. They also see themselves as highly exposed to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. However, despite these differences, subjects with high levels of thematic relevance are nevertheless sensitive to exposure reduction as a means for improving the acceptance of base stations in their neighborhood. This underlines the value of exposure reduction for the acceptance of radio frequency electromagnetic field communication technologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5486306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54863062017-06-30 RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies? Wiedemann, Peter M. Freudenstein, Frederik Böhmert, Christoph Wiart, Joe Croft, Rodney J. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article An implicit assumption of risk perception studies is that concerns expressed in questionnaires reflect concerns in everyday life. The aim of the present study is to check this assumption, i.e., the extrapolability of risk perceptions expressed in a survey, to risk perceptions in everyday life. To that end, risk perceptions were measured by a multidimensional approach. In addition to the traditional focus on measuring the magnitude of risk perceptions, the thematic relevance (how often people think about a risk issue) and the discursive relevance (how often people think about or discuss a risk issue) of risk perceptions were also collected. Taking into account this extended view of risk perception, an online survey was conducted in six European countries with 2454 respondents, referring to radio frequency electromagnetic field (RF EMF) risk potentials from base stations, and access points, such as WiFi routers and cell phones. The findings reveal that the present study’s multidimensional approach to measuring risk perception provides a more differentiated understanding of RF EMF risk perception. High levels of concerns expressed in questionnaires do not automatically imply that these concerns are thematically relevant in everyday life. We use thematic relevance to distinguish between enduringly concerned (high concern according to both questionnaire and thematic relevance) and not enduringly concerned participants (high concern according to questionnaire but no thematic relevance). Furthermore, we provide data for the empirical value of this distinction: Compared to other participants, enduringly concerned subjects consider radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure to a greater extent as a moral and affective issue. They also see themselves as highly exposed to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. However, despite these differences, subjects with high levels of thematic relevance are nevertheless sensitive to exposure reduction as a means for improving the acceptance of base stations in their neighborhood. This underlines the value of exposure reduction for the acceptance of radio frequency electromagnetic field communication technologies. MDPI 2017-06-08 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5486306/ /pubmed/28594366 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060620 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wiedemann, Peter M. Freudenstein, Frederik Böhmert, Christoph Wiart, Joe Croft, Rodney J. RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies? |
title | RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies? |
title_full | RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies? |
title_fullStr | RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies? |
title_full_unstemmed | RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies? |
title_short | RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies? |
title_sort | rf emf risk perception revisited: is the focus on concern sufficient for risk perception studies? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594366 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060620 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiedemannpeterm rfemfriskperceptionrevisitedisthefocusonconcernsufficientforriskperceptionstudies AT freudensteinfrederik rfemfriskperceptionrevisitedisthefocusonconcernsufficientforriskperceptionstudies AT bohmertchristoph rfemfriskperceptionrevisitedisthefocusonconcernsufficientforriskperceptionstudies AT wiartjoe rfemfriskperceptionrevisitedisthefocusonconcernsufficientforriskperceptionstudies AT croftrodneyj rfemfriskperceptionrevisitedisthefocusonconcernsufficientforriskperceptionstudies |