Cargando…

Does trajectory matter? A study looking into the relationship of trajectory with target engagement and error accommodation in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is now a key treatment choice for advanced Parkinson’s disease. The optimum target area within the STN is well established. However, no emphasis on the impact of trajectory exists. The ellipsoid shape of the STN and the off-ce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steel, David Anthony, Basu, Surajit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28361249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3151-y
_version_ 1783246288259645440
author Steel, David Anthony
Basu, Surajit
author_facet Steel, David Anthony
Basu, Surajit
author_sort Steel, David Anthony
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is now a key treatment choice for advanced Parkinson’s disease. The optimum target area within the STN is well established. However, no emphasis on the impact of trajectory exists. The ellipsoid shape of the STN and the off-centre traditional target point mean that variation in the electrode inclination should affect STN engagement. Understanding of this relationship could inform trajectory selection during planning by improving STN engagements and margins for error. METHOD: We simulated electrode placement at the clinical target through a set of trial trajectories. Twelve three-dimensionally reconstructed STNs were created from magnetic resonance imaging data of six patients. An appropriate target within each STN was then chosen. Each STN was approached through 56 simulated trajectories arranged in a grid covering a quadrant of skull around and in front of the coronal suture. A subset of 20 viable trajectories was reassessed for depth of engagement in each STN whilst approaching the chosen target. RESULTS: Group averages for each trajectory are presented as traffic light maps and as an overlaid skull mask illustrating recommended electrode entry sites. Trajectories under 30 degrees anterior to the bregma and between 10 to 30 degrees off the midline accommodated over 2.4 degrees of wobble. A mean engagement of 6 mm was possible in half of the subset. The longest engagements are on trajectories which saddle the coronal suture, extending to 40 degrees lateral. Microelectrode tracts of 14 additional STNs were collated using the above protocol and engagement exceeded 5 mm in all central trajectories without capsular side effects, suggesting placement away from STN borders. CONCLUSIONS: Trajectory selection influences engagement and flexibility to accommodate electrode wobble or brain shift whilst approaching a chosen STN target. We recommend having the first trial trajectory 20 degrees anterior to the bregma, moving postero-laterally in successive trials to balance both error and engagement. When wider margins for error are beneficial (e.g. second side during bilateral procedures), trajectories nearer the coronal suture and around 25 degrees off the midline are advised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5486602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54866022017-07-11 Does trajectory matter? A study looking into the relationship of trajectory with target engagement and error accommodation in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation Steel, David Anthony Basu, Surajit Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Functional BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is now a key treatment choice for advanced Parkinson’s disease. The optimum target area within the STN is well established. However, no emphasis on the impact of trajectory exists. The ellipsoid shape of the STN and the off-centre traditional target point mean that variation in the electrode inclination should affect STN engagement. Understanding of this relationship could inform trajectory selection during planning by improving STN engagements and margins for error. METHOD: We simulated electrode placement at the clinical target through a set of trial trajectories. Twelve three-dimensionally reconstructed STNs were created from magnetic resonance imaging data of six patients. An appropriate target within each STN was then chosen. Each STN was approached through 56 simulated trajectories arranged in a grid covering a quadrant of skull around and in front of the coronal suture. A subset of 20 viable trajectories was reassessed for depth of engagement in each STN whilst approaching the chosen target. RESULTS: Group averages for each trajectory are presented as traffic light maps and as an overlaid skull mask illustrating recommended electrode entry sites. Trajectories under 30 degrees anterior to the bregma and between 10 to 30 degrees off the midline accommodated over 2.4 degrees of wobble. A mean engagement of 6 mm was possible in half of the subset. The longest engagements are on trajectories which saddle the coronal suture, extending to 40 degrees lateral. Microelectrode tracts of 14 additional STNs were collated using the above protocol and engagement exceeded 5 mm in all central trajectories without capsular side effects, suggesting placement away from STN borders. CONCLUSIONS: Trajectory selection influences engagement and flexibility to accommodate electrode wobble or brain shift whilst approaching a chosen STN target. We recommend having the first trial trajectory 20 degrees anterior to the bregma, moving postero-laterally in successive trials to balance both error and engagement. When wider margins for error are beneficial (e.g. second side during bilateral procedures), trajectories nearer the coronal suture and around 25 degrees off the midline are advised. Springer Vienna 2017-03-30 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5486602/ /pubmed/28361249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3151-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article - Functional
Steel, David Anthony
Basu, Surajit
Does trajectory matter? A study looking into the relationship of trajectory with target engagement and error accommodation in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation
title Does trajectory matter? A study looking into the relationship of trajectory with target engagement and error accommodation in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation
title_full Does trajectory matter? A study looking into the relationship of trajectory with target engagement and error accommodation in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation
title_fullStr Does trajectory matter? A study looking into the relationship of trajectory with target engagement and error accommodation in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Does trajectory matter? A study looking into the relationship of trajectory with target engagement and error accommodation in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation
title_short Does trajectory matter? A study looking into the relationship of trajectory with target engagement and error accommodation in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation
title_sort does trajectory matter? a study looking into the relationship of trajectory with target engagement and error accommodation in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation
topic Original Article - Functional
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28361249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3151-y
work_keys_str_mv AT steeldavidanthony doestrajectorymatterastudylookingintotherelationshipoftrajectorywithtargetengagementanderroraccommodationinsubthalamicnucleusdeepbrainstimulation
AT basusurajit doestrajectorymatterastudylookingintotherelationshipoftrajectorywithtargetengagementanderroraccommodationinsubthalamicnucleusdeepbrainstimulation