Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan

SUMMARY: Model-based economic evaluation was performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid. Although zoledronic acid was dominated by alendronate, the incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was quite small in extent. Considering the advantage of once-yearly injection of zoledr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moriwaki, K., Mouri, M., Hagino, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3973-8
_version_ 1783246363002142720
author Moriwaki, K.
Mouri, M.
Hagino, H.
author_facet Moriwaki, K.
Mouri, M.
Hagino, H.
author_sort Moriwaki, K.
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: Model-based economic evaluation was performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid. Although zoledronic acid was dominated by alendronate, the incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was quite small in extent. Considering the advantage of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid in persistence, zoledronic acid might be a cost-effective treatment option compared to once-weekly oral alendronate. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan. METHODS: A patient-level state-transition model was developed to predict the outcome of patients with osteoporosis who have experienced a previous vertebral fracture. The efficacy of zoledronic acid was derived from a published network meta-analysis. Lifetime cost and QALYs were estimated for patients who had received zoledronic acid, alendronate, or basic treatment alone. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of zoledronic acid was estimated. RESULTS: For patients 70 years of age, zoledronic acid was dominated by alendronate with incremental QALY of −0.004 to −0.000 and incremental cost of 430 USD to 493 USD. Deterministic sensitivity analysis indicated that the relative risk of hip fracture and drug cost strongly affected the cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid compared to alendronate. Scenario analysis considering treatment persistence showed that the ICER of zoledronic acid compared to alendronate was estimated to be 47,435 USD, 27,018 USD, and 10,749 USD per QALY gained for patients with a T-score of −2.0, −2.5, or −3.0, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although zoledronic acid is dominated by alendronate, the incremental QALY is quite small in extent. Considering the advantage of annual zoledronic acid treatment in compliance and persistence, zoledronic acid may be a cost-effective treatment option compared to alendronate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00198-017-3973-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5486933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54869332017-07-17 Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan Moriwaki, K. Mouri, M. Hagino, H. Osteoporos Int Original Article SUMMARY: Model-based economic evaluation was performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid. Although zoledronic acid was dominated by alendronate, the incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was quite small in extent. Considering the advantage of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid in persistence, zoledronic acid might be a cost-effective treatment option compared to once-weekly oral alendronate. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan. METHODS: A patient-level state-transition model was developed to predict the outcome of patients with osteoporosis who have experienced a previous vertebral fracture. The efficacy of zoledronic acid was derived from a published network meta-analysis. Lifetime cost and QALYs were estimated for patients who had received zoledronic acid, alendronate, or basic treatment alone. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of zoledronic acid was estimated. RESULTS: For patients 70 years of age, zoledronic acid was dominated by alendronate with incremental QALY of −0.004 to −0.000 and incremental cost of 430 USD to 493 USD. Deterministic sensitivity analysis indicated that the relative risk of hip fracture and drug cost strongly affected the cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid compared to alendronate. Scenario analysis considering treatment persistence showed that the ICER of zoledronic acid compared to alendronate was estimated to be 47,435 USD, 27,018 USD, and 10,749 USD per QALY gained for patients with a T-score of −2.0, −2.5, or −3.0, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although zoledronic acid is dominated by alendronate, the incremental QALY is quite small in extent. Considering the advantage of annual zoledronic acid treatment in compliance and persistence, zoledronic acid may be a cost-effective treatment option compared to alendronate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00198-017-3973-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer London 2017-03-06 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5486933/ /pubmed/28265718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3973-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Moriwaki, K.
Mouri, M.
Hagino, H.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in japan
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3973-8
work_keys_str_mv AT moriwakik costeffectivenessanalysisofonceyearlyinjectionofzoledronicacidforthetreatmentofosteoporosisinjapan
AT mourim costeffectivenessanalysisofonceyearlyinjectionofzoledronicacidforthetreatmentofosteoporosisinjapan
AT haginoh costeffectivenessanalysisofonceyearlyinjectionofzoledronicacidforthetreatmentofosteoporosisinjapan