Cargando…
Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence
The goal of this study was to survey optical and biochemical variation in cell populations deposited onto a surface through touch or contact and identify specific features that may be used to distinguish and then sort cell populations from separate contributors in a trace biological mixture. Althoug...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28516277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0364-0 |
_version_ | 1783246364223733760 |
---|---|
author | Katherine Philpott, M. Stanciu, Cristina E. Kwon, Ye Jin Bustamante, Eduardo E. Greenspoon, Susan A. Ehrhardt, Christopher J. |
author_facet | Katherine Philpott, M. Stanciu, Cristina E. Kwon, Ye Jin Bustamante, Eduardo E. Greenspoon, Susan A. Ehrhardt, Christopher J. |
author_sort | Katherine Philpott, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The goal of this study was to survey optical and biochemical variation in cell populations deposited onto a surface through touch or contact and identify specific features that may be used to distinguish and then sort cell populations from separate contributors in a trace biological mixture. Although we were not able to detect meaningful biochemical variation in touch samples deposited by different contributors through preliminary antibody surveys, we did observe distinct differences in red autofluorescence emissions (650–670 nm), with as much as a tenfold difference in mean fluorescence intensities observed between certain pairs of donors. Results indicate that the level of red autofluorescence in touch samples can be influenced by a donor’s contact with specific material prior to handling the substrate from which cells were collected. In particular, we observed increased red autofluorescence in cells deposited subsequent to handling laboratory gloves, plant material, and certain types of marker ink, which could be easily visualized microscopically or using flow cytometry, and persisted after hand washing. To test whether these observed optical differences could potentially be used as the basis for a cell separation workflow, a controlled two-person touch mixture was separated into two fractions via fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) using gating criteria based on intensity of 650–670 nm emissions and then subjected to DNA analysis. Genetic analysis of the sorted fractions provided partial DNA profiles that were consistent with separation of individual contributors from the mixture suggesting that variation in autofluorescence signatures, even if driven by extrinsic factors, may nonetheless be a useful means of isolating contributors to some touch mixtures. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-017-0364-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5486938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54869382017-07-17 Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence Katherine Philpott, M. Stanciu, Cristina E. Kwon, Ye Jin Bustamante, Eduardo E. Greenspoon, Susan A. Ehrhardt, Christopher J. Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper The goal of this study was to survey optical and biochemical variation in cell populations deposited onto a surface through touch or contact and identify specific features that may be used to distinguish and then sort cell populations from separate contributors in a trace biological mixture. Although we were not able to detect meaningful biochemical variation in touch samples deposited by different contributors through preliminary antibody surveys, we did observe distinct differences in red autofluorescence emissions (650–670 nm), with as much as a tenfold difference in mean fluorescence intensities observed between certain pairs of donors. Results indicate that the level of red autofluorescence in touch samples can be influenced by a donor’s contact with specific material prior to handling the substrate from which cells were collected. In particular, we observed increased red autofluorescence in cells deposited subsequent to handling laboratory gloves, plant material, and certain types of marker ink, which could be easily visualized microscopically or using flow cytometry, and persisted after hand washing. To test whether these observed optical differences could potentially be used as the basis for a cell separation workflow, a controlled two-person touch mixture was separated into two fractions via fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) using gating criteria based on intensity of 650–670 nm emissions and then subjected to DNA analysis. Genetic analysis of the sorted fractions provided partial DNA profiles that were consistent with separation of individual contributors from the mixture suggesting that variation in autofluorescence signatures, even if driven by extrinsic factors, may nonetheless be a useful means of isolating contributors to some touch mixtures. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-017-0364-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-05-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5486938/ /pubmed/28516277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0364-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Katherine Philpott, M. Stanciu, Cristina E. Kwon, Ye Jin Bustamante, Eduardo E. Greenspoon, Susan A. Ehrhardt, Christopher J. Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence |
title | Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence |
title_full | Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence |
title_fullStr | Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence |
title_short | Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence |
title_sort | analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28516277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0364-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katherinephilpottm analysisofcellularautofluorescenceintouchsamplesbyflowcytometryimplicationsforfrontendseparationoftracemixtureevidence AT stanciucristinae analysisofcellularautofluorescenceintouchsamplesbyflowcytometryimplicationsforfrontendseparationoftracemixtureevidence AT kwonyejin analysisofcellularautofluorescenceintouchsamplesbyflowcytometryimplicationsforfrontendseparationoftracemixtureevidence AT bustamanteeduardoe analysisofcellularautofluorescenceintouchsamplesbyflowcytometryimplicationsforfrontendseparationoftracemixtureevidence AT greenspoonsusana analysisofcellularautofluorescenceintouchsamplesbyflowcytometryimplicationsforfrontendseparationoftracemixtureevidence AT ehrhardtchristopherj analysisofcellularautofluorescenceintouchsamplesbyflowcytometryimplicationsforfrontendseparationoftracemixtureevidence |