Cargando…

Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence

The goal of this study was to survey optical and biochemical variation in cell populations deposited onto a surface through touch or contact and identify specific features that may be used to distinguish and then sort cell populations from separate contributors in a trace biological mixture. Althoug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katherine Philpott, M., Stanciu, Cristina E., Kwon, Ye Jin, Bustamante, Eduardo E., Greenspoon, Susan A., Ehrhardt, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28516277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0364-0
_version_ 1783246364223733760
author Katherine Philpott, M.
Stanciu, Cristina E.
Kwon, Ye Jin
Bustamante, Eduardo E.
Greenspoon, Susan A.
Ehrhardt, Christopher J.
author_facet Katherine Philpott, M.
Stanciu, Cristina E.
Kwon, Ye Jin
Bustamante, Eduardo E.
Greenspoon, Susan A.
Ehrhardt, Christopher J.
author_sort Katherine Philpott, M.
collection PubMed
description The goal of this study was to survey optical and biochemical variation in cell populations deposited onto a surface through touch or contact and identify specific features that may be used to distinguish and then sort cell populations from separate contributors in a trace biological mixture. Although we were not able to detect meaningful biochemical variation in touch samples deposited by different contributors through preliminary antibody surveys, we did observe distinct differences in red autofluorescence emissions (650–670 nm), with as much as a tenfold difference in mean fluorescence intensities observed between certain pairs of donors. Results indicate that the level of red autofluorescence in touch samples can be influenced by a donor’s contact with specific material prior to handling the substrate from which cells were collected. In particular, we observed increased red autofluorescence in cells deposited subsequent to handling laboratory gloves, plant material, and certain types of marker ink, which could be easily visualized microscopically or using flow cytometry, and persisted after hand washing. To test whether these observed optical differences could potentially be used as the basis for a cell separation workflow, a controlled two-person touch mixture was separated into two fractions via fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) using gating criteria based on intensity of 650–670 nm emissions and then subjected to DNA analysis. Genetic analysis of the sorted fractions provided partial DNA profiles that were consistent with separation of individual contributors from the mixture suggesting that variation in autofluorescence signatures, even if driven by extrinsic factors, may nonetheless be a useful means of isolating contributors to some touch mixtures. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-017-0364-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5486938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54869382017-07-17 Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence Katherine Philpott, M. Stanciu, Cristina E. Kwon, Ye Jin Bustamante, Eduardo E. Greenspoon, Susan A. Ehrhardt, Christopher J. Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper The goal of this study was to survey optical and biochemical variation in cell populations deposited onto a surface through touch or contact and identify specific features that may be used to distinguish and then sort cell populations from separate contributors in a trace biological mixture. Although we were not able to detect meaningful biochemical variation in touch samples deposited by different contributors through preliminary antibody surveys, we did observe distinct differences in red autofluorescence emissions (650–670 nm), with as much as a tenfold difference in mean fluorescence intensities observed between certain pairs of donors. Results indicate that the level of red autofluorescence in touch samples can be influenced by a donor’s contact with specific material prior to handling the substrate from which cells were collected. In particular, we observed increased red autofluorescence in cells deposited subsequent to handling laboratory gloves, plant material, and certain types of marker ink, which could be easily visualized microscopically or using flow cytometry, and persisted after hand washing. To test whether these observed optical differences could potentially be used as the basis for a cell separation workflow, a controlled two-person touch mixture was separated into two fractions via fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) using gating criteria based on intensity of 650–670 nm emissions and then subjected to DNA analysis. Genetic analysis of the sorted fractions provided partial DNA profiles that were consistent with separation of individual contributors from the mixture suggesting that variation in autofluorescence signatures, even if driven by extrinsic factors, may nonetheless be a useful means of isolating contributors to some touch mixtures. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-017-0364-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-05-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5486938/ /pubmed/28516277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0364-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Katherine Philpott, M.
Stanciu, Cristina E.
Kwon, Ye Jin
Bustamante, Eduardo E.
Greenspoon, Susan A.
Ehrhardt, Christopher J.
Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence
title Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence
title_full Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence
title_fullStr Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence
title_short Analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence
title_sort analysis of cellular autofluorescence in touch samples by flow cytometry: implications for front end separation of trace mixture evidence
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28516277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0364-0
work_keys_str_mv AT katherinephilpottm analysisofcellularautofluorescenceintouchsamplesbyflowcytometryimplicationsforfrontendseparationoftracemixtureevidence
AT stanciucristinae analysisofcellularautofluorescenceintouchsamplesbyflowcytometryimplicationsforfrontendseparationoftracemixtureevidence
AT kwonyejin analysisofcellularautofluorescenceintouchsamplesbyflowcytometryimplicationsforfrontendseparationoftracemixtureevidence
AT bustamanteeduardoe analysisofcellularautofluorescenceintouchsamplesbyflowcytometryimplicationsforfrontendseparationoftracemixtureevidence
AT greenspoonsusana analysisofcellularautofluorescenceintouchsamplesbyflowcytometryimplicationsforfrontendseparationoftracemixtureevidence
AT ehrhardtchristopherj analysisofcellularautofluorescenceintouchsamplesbyflowcytometryimplicationsforfrontendseparationoftracemixtureevidence