Cargando…

Two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training

Selective attention supports the prioritized processing of relevant sensory information to facilitate goal-directed behavior. Studies in human subjects demonstrate that attentional gain of cortical responses can sufficiently account for attention-related improvements in behavior. On the other hand,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Itthipuripat, Sirawaj, Cha, Kexin, Byers, Anna, Serences, John T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28654635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001724
_version_ 1783246369866121216
author Itthipuripat, Sirawaj
Cha, Kexin
Byers, Anna
Serences, John T.
author_facet Itthipuripat, Sirawaj
Cha, Kexin
Byers, Anna
Serences, John T.
author_sort Itthipuripat, Sirawaj
collection PubMed
description Selective attention supports the prioritized processing of relevant sensory information to facilitate goal-directed behavior. Studies in human subjects demonstrate that attentional gain of cortical responses can sufficiently account for attention-related improvements in behavior. On the other hand, studies using highly trained nonhuman primates suggest that reductions in neural noise can better explain attentional facilitation of behavior. Given the importance of selective information processing in nearly all domains of cognition, we sought to reconcile these competing accounts by testing the hypothesis that extensive behavioral training alters the neural mechanisms that support selective attention. We tested this hypothesis using electroencephalography (EEG) to measure stimulus-evoked visual responses from human subjects while they performed a selective spatial attention task over the course of ~1 month. Early in training, spatial attention led to an increase in the gain of stimulus-evoked visual responses. Gain was apparent within ~100 ms of stimulus onset, and a quantitative model based on signal detection theory (SDT) successfully linked the magnitude of this gain modulation to attention-related improvements in behavior. However, after extensive training, this early attentional gain was eliminated even though there were still substantial attention-related improvements in behavior. Accordingly, the SDT-based model required noise reduction to account for the link between the stimulus-evoked visual responses and attentional modulations of behavior. These findings suggest that training can lead to fundamental changes in the way attention alters the early cortical responses that support selective information processing. Moreover, these data facilitate the translation of results across different species and across experimental procedures that employ different behavioral training regimes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5486967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54869672017-07-11 Two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training Itthipuripat, Sirawaj Cha, Kexin Byers, Anna Serences, John T. PLoS Biol Research Article Selective attention supports the prioritized processing of relevant sensory information to facilitate goal-directed behavior. Studies in human subjects demonstrate that attentional gain of cortical responses can sufficiently account for attention-related improvements in behavior. On the other hand, studies using highly trained nonhuman primates suggest that reductions in neural noise can better explain attentional facilitation of behavior. Given the importance of selective information processing in nearly all domains of cognition, we sought to reconcile these competing accounts by testing the hypothesis that extensive behavioral training alters the neural mechanisms that support selective attention. We tested this hypothesis using electroencephalography (EEG) to measure stimulus-evoked visual responses from human subjects while they performed a selective spatial attention task over the course of ~1 month. Early in training, spatial attention led to an increase in the gain of stimulus-evoked visual responses. Gain was apparent within ~100 ms of stimulus onset, and a quantitative model based on signal detection theory (SDT) successfully linked the magnitude of this gain modulation to attention-related improvements in behavior. However, after extensive training, this early attentional gain was eliminated even though there were still substantial attention-related improvements in behavior. Accordingly, the SDT-based model required noise reduction to account for the link between the stimulus-evoked visual responses and attentional modulations of behavior. These findings suggest that training can lead to fundamental changes in the way attention alters the early cortical responses that support selective information processing. Moreover, these data facilitate the translation of results across different species and across experimental procedures that employ different behavioral training regimes. Public Library of Science 2017-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5486967/ /pubmed/28654635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001724 Text en © 2017 Itthipuripat et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Itthipuripat, Sirawaj
Cha, Kexin
Byers, Anna
Serences, John T.
Two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training
title Two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training
title_full Two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training
title_fullStr Two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training
title_full_unstemmed Two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training
title_short Two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training
title_sort two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28654635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001724
work_keys_str_mv AT itthipuripatsirawaj twodifferentmechanismssupportselectiveattentionatdifferentphasesoftraining
AT chakexin twodifferentmechanismssupportselectiveattentionatdifferentphasesoftraining
AT byersanna twodifferentmechanismssupportselectiveattentionatdifferentphasesoftraining
AT serencesjohnt twodifferentmechanismssupportselectiveattentionatdifferentphasesoftraining