Cargando…
Modulation of iTBS after-effects via concurrent directional TDCS: A proof of principle study
BACKGROUND: Polarising currents can modulate membrane potentials in animals, affecting the after-effect of theta burst stimulation (TBS) on synaptic strength. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether a similar phenomenon could also be observed in human motor cortex (M1) using transcranial direct current stimu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28404455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.03.009 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Polarising currents can modulate membrane potentials in animals, affecting the after-effect of theta burst stimulation (TBS) on synaptic strength. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether a similar phenomenon could also be observed in human motor cortex (M1) using transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) during monophasic intermittent TBS (iTBS). METHODS: TDCS was applied during posterior-anterior iTBS using three different conditions: posterior-anterior TDCS (anode 3.5 cm posterior to M1, cathode 3.5 cm anterior to M1), anterior-posterior TDCS (cathode 3.5 cm posterior to M1, anode 3.5 cm anterior to M1), and sham TDCS. RESULTS: When the direction of TDCS (posterior-anterior) matched the direction of the electrical field induced by iTBS, we found a 19% non-significant increase in excitability changes in comparison with iTBS combined with sham TDCS. When the TDCS was reversed (anterior-posterior), the excitatory effect of iTBS was abolished. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that excitatory after-effects of iTBS can be modulated by directionally-specific TDCS. |
---|