Cargando…

Modulation of iTBS after-effects via concurrent directional TDCS: A proof of principle study

BACKGROUND: Polarising currents can modulate membrane potentials in animals, affecting the after-effect of theta burst stimulation (TBS) on synaptic strength. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether a similar phenomenon could also be observed in human motor cortex (M1) using transcranial direct current stimu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tremblay, Sara, Hannah, Ricci, Rawji, Vishal, Rothwell, John C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28404455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.03.009
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Polarising currents can modulate membrane potentials in animals, affecting the after-effect of theta burst stimulation (TBS) on synaptic strength. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether a similar phenomenon could also be observed in human motor cortex (M1) using transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) during monophasic intermittent TBS (iTBS). METHODS: TDCS was applied during posterior-anterior iTBS using three different conditions: posterior-anterior TDCS (anode 3.5 cm posterior to M1, cathode 3.5 cm anterior to M1), anterior-posterior TDCS (cathode 3.5 cm posterior to M1, anode 3.5 cm anterior to M1), and sham TDCS. RESULTS: When the direction of TDCS (posterior-anterior) matched the direction of the electrical field induced by iTBS, we found a 19% non-significant increase in excitability changes in comparison with iTBS combined with sham TDCS. When the TDCS was reversed (anterior-posterior), the excitatory effect of iTBS was abolished. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that excitatory after-effects of iTBS can be modulated by directionally-specific TDCS.