Cargando…

Diffusion-weighted imaging of suspicious (BI-RADS 4) breast lesions: stratification based on histopathology

OBJECTIVE: To test the use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in stratifying suspicious breast lesions (BI-RADS 4), correlating them with histopathology. We also investigated the performance of DWI related to the main enhancement patterns (mass and non-mass) and tested its reproducibility. MATERIAL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Almeida, João Ricardo Maltez, Gomes, André Boechat, Barros, Thomas Pitangueira, Fahel, Paulo Eduardo, Rocha, Mario de Souza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28670026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0224
_version_ 1783246421536800768
author de Almeida, João Ricardo Maltez
Gomes, André Boechat
Barros, Thomas Pitangueira
Fahel, Paulo Eduardo
Rocha, Mario de Souza
author_facet de Almeida, João Ricardo Maltez
Gomes, André Boechat
Barros, Thomas Pitangueira
Fahel, Paulo Eduardo
Rocha, Mario de Souza
author_sort de Almeida, João Ricardo Maltez
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To test the use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in stratifying suspicious breast lesions (BI-RADS 4), correlating them with histopathology. We also investigated the performance of DWI related to the main enhancement patterns (mass and non-mass) and tested its reproducibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients presented 92 lesions during the sampling period. Two independent examiners reviewed magnetic resonance imaging studies, described the lesions, and determined the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Differences among benign, indeterminate- to high-risk, and malignant findings, in terms of the ADCs, were assessed by analysis of variance. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we compared the performance of ADC values in masses and non-mass lesions, and tested the reproducibility of measurements by determining the coefficient of variation and smallest real difference. RESULTS: Among the 92 lesions evaluated, the histopathology showed that 37 were benign, 11 were indeterminate- to high-risk, and 44 were malignant. The mean ADC differed significantly among those histopathological groups, the value obtained for the malignant lesions (1.10 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) being significantly lower than that obtained for the other groups (p < 0.001). ROC curves demonstrated that DWI performed better when applied to masses than when applied to non-mass lesions (area under the curve, 0.88 vs. 0.67). Reproducibility was good (coefficient of variation, 7.03%; and smallest real difference, ± 0.242 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s). CONCLUSION: DWI can differentiate between malignant and nonmalignant (benign or indeterminate- to high-risk) lesions, showing better performance for masses. Nevertheless, stratification based on histopathological criteria that are more refined has yet to be achieved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5487229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54872292017-06-30 Diffusion-weighted imaging of suspicious (BI-RADS 4) breast lesions: stratification based on histopathology de Almeida, João Ricardo Maltez Gomes, André Boechat Barros, Thomas Pitangueira Fahel, Paulo Eduardo Rocha, Mario de Souza Radiol Bras Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To test the use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in stratifying suspicious breast lesions (BI-RADS 4), correlating them with histopathology. We also investigated the performance of DWI related to the main enhancement patterns (mass and non-mass) and tested its reproducibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients presented 92 lesions during the sampling period. Two independent examiners reviewed magnetic resonance imaging studies, described the lesions, and determined the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Differences among benign, indeterminate- to high-risk, and malignant findings, in terms of the ADCs, were assessed by analysis of variance. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we compared the performance of ADC values in masses and non-mass lesions, and tested the reproducibility of measurements by determining the coefficient of variation and smallest real difference. RESULTS: Among the 92 lesions evaluated, the histopathology showed that 37 were benign, 11 were indeterminate- to high-risk, and 44 were malignant. The mean ADC differed significantly among those histopathological groups, the value obtained for the malignant lesions (1.10 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) being significantly lower than that obtained for the other groups (p < 0.001). ROC curves demonstrated that DWI performed better when applied to masses than when applied to non-mass lesions (area under the curve, 0.88 vs. 0.67). Reproducibility was good (coefficient of variation, 7.03%; and smallest real difference, ± 0.242 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s). CONCLUSION: DWI can differentiate between malignant and nonmalignant (benign or indeterminate- to high-risk) lesions, showing better performance for masses. Nevertheless, stratification based on histopathological criteria that are more refined has yet to be achieved. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5487229/ /pubmed/28670026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0224 Text en © Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
de Almeida, João Ricardo Maltez
Gomes, André Boechat
Barros, Thomas Pitangueira
Fahel, Paulo Eduardo
Rocha, Mario de Souza
Diffusion-weighted imaging of suspicious (BI-RADS 4) breast lesions: stratification based on histopathology
title Diffusion-weighted imaging of suspicious (BI-RADS 4) breast lesions: stratification based on histopathology
title_full Diffusion-weighted imaging of suspicious (BI-RADS 4) breast lesions: stratification based on histopathology
title_fullStr Diffusion-weighted imaging of suspicious (BI-RADS 4) breast lesions: stratification based on histopathology
title_full_unstemmed Diffusion-weighted imaging of suspicious (BI-RADS 4) breast lesions: stratification based on histopathology
title_short Diffusion-weighted imaging of suspicious (BI-RADS 4) breast lesions: stratification based on histopathology
title_sort diffusion-weighted imaging of suspicious (bi-rads 4) breast lesions: stratification based on histopathology
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28670026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0224
work_keys_str_mv AT dealmeidajoaoricardomaltez diffusionweightedimagingofsuspiciousbirads4breastlesionsstratificationbasedonhistopathology
AT gomesandreboechat diffusionweightedimagingofsuspiciousbirads4breastlesionsstratificationbasedonhistopathology
AT barrosthomaspitangueira diffusionweightedimagingofsuspiciousbirads4breastlesionsstratificationbasedonhistopathology
AT fahelpauloeduardo diffusionweightedimagingofsuspiciousbirads4breastlesionsstratificationbasedonhistopathology
AT rochamariodesouza diffusionweightedimagingofsuspiciousbirads4breastlesionsstratificationbasedonhistopathology