Cargando…

Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria

Citizen science has become more popular in recent years, quickly taking on a variety of potentially conflicting characteristics: a way to collect massive data sets at relatively low cost, a way to break science out of the ivory tower and better engage the public, an approach to educate lay people in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pettibone, Lisa, Vohland, Katrin, Ziegler, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28654930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178778
_version_ 1783246428074672128
author Pettibone, Lisa
Vohland, Katrin
Ziegler, David
author_facet Pettibone, Lisa
Vohland, Katrin
Ziegler, David
author_sort Pettibone, Lisa
collection PubMed
description Citizen science has become more popular in recent years, quickly taking on a variety of potentially conflicting characteristics: a way to collect massive data sets at relatively low cost, a way to break science out of the ivory tower and better engage the public, an approach to educate lay people in scientific methods. But the extent of current citizen science practice—the types of actors and scientific disciplines who take part—is still poorly understood. This article builds on recent surveys of citizen science in PLOS One by analyzing citizen science practice in Germany and Austria through the projects on two online platforms. We find evidence supporting previous findings that citizen science is a phenomenon strongest in biodiversity and environmental monitoring research, but at home in a number of scientific fields, such as history and geography. In addition, our survey method yields new insights into citizen science projects initiated by non-scientific actors. We close by discussing additional methodological considerations in attempting to present a cross-disciplinary overview of citizen science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5487260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54872602017-07-11 Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria Pettibone, Lisa Vohland, Katrin Ziegler, David PLoS One Research Article Citizen science has become more popular in recent years, quickly taking on a variety of potentially conflicting characteristics: a way to collect massive data sets at relatively low cost, a way to break science out of the ivory tower and better engage the public, an approach to educate lay people in scientific methods. But the extent of current citizen science practice—the types of actors and scientific disciplines who take part—is still poorly understood. This article builds on recent surveys of citizen science in PLOS One by analyzing citizen science practice in Germany and Austria through the projects on two online platforms. We find evidence supporting previous findings that citizen science is a phenomenon strongest in biodiversity and environmental monitoring research, but at home in a number of scientific fields, such as history and geography. In addition, our survey method yields new insights into citizen science projects initiated by non-scientific actors. We close by discussing additional methodological considerations in attempting to present a cross-disciplinary overview of citizen science. Public Library of Science 2017-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5487260/ /pubmed/28654930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178778 Text en © 2017 Pettibone et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pettibone, Lisa
Vohland, Katrin
Ziegler, David
Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria
title Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria
title_full Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria
title_fullStr Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria
title_short Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria
title_sort understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: a survey of current practice in germany and austria
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28654930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178778
work_keys_str_mv AT pettibonelisa understandingtheinterdisciplinaryandinstitutionaldiversityofcitizenscienceasurveyofcurrentpracticeingermanyandaustria
AT vohlandkatrin understandingtheinterdisciplinaryandinstitutionaldiversityofcitizenscienceasurveyofcurrentpracticeingermanyandaustria
AT zieglerdavid understandingtheinterdisciplinaryandinstitutionaldiversityofcitizenscienceasurveyofcurrentpracticeingermanyandaustria