Cargando…
Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria
Citizen science has become more popular in recent years, quickly taking on a variety of potentially conflicting characteristics: a way to collect massive data sets at relatively low cost, a way to break science out of the ivory tower and better engage the public, an approach to educate lay people in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28654930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178778 |
_version_ | 1783246428074672128 |
---|---|
author | Pettibone, Lisa Vohland, Katrin Ziegler, David |
author_facet | Pettibone, Lisa Vohland, Katrin Ziegler, David |
author_sort | Pettibone, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Citizen science has become more popular in recent years, quickly taking on a variety of potentially conflicting characteristics: a way to collect massive data sets at relatively low cost, a way to break science out of the ivory tower and better engage the public, an approach to educate lay people in scientific methods. But the extent of current citizen science practice—the types of actors and scientific disciplines who take part—is still poorly understood. This article builds on recent surveys of citizen science in PLOS One by analyzing citizen science practice in Germany and Austria through the projects on two online platforms. We find evidence supporting previous findings that citizen science is a phenomenon strongest in biodiversity and environmental monitoring research, but at home in a number of scientific fields, such as history and geography. In addition, our survey method yields new insights into citizen science projects initiated by non-scientific actors. We close by discussing additional methodological considerations in attempting to present a cross-disciplinary overview of citizen science. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5487260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54872602017-07-11 Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria Pettibone, Lisa Vohland, Katrin Ziegler, David PLoS One Research Article Citizen science has become more popular in recent years, quickly taking on a variety of potentially conflicting characteristics: a way to collect massive data sets at relatively low cost, a way to break science out of the ivory tower and better engage the public, an approach to educate lay people in scientific methods. But the extent of current citizen science practice—the types of actors and scientific disciplines who take part—is still poorly understood. This article builds on recent surveys of citizen science in PLOS One by analyzing citizen science practice in Germany and Austria through the projects on two online platforms. We find evidence supporting previous findings that citizen science is a phenomenon strongest in biodiversity and environmental monitoring research, but at home in a number of scientific fields, such as history and geography. In addition, our survey method yields new insights into citizen science projects initiated by non-scientific actors. We close by discussing additional methodological considerations in attempting to present a cross-disciplinary overview of citizen science. Public Library of Science 2017-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5487260/ /pubmed/28654930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178778 Text en © 2017 Pettibone et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pettibone, Lisa Vohland, Katrin Ziegler, David Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria |
title | Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria |
title_full | Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria |
title_fullStr | Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria |
title_short | Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria |
title_sort | understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: a survey of current practice in germany and austria |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28654930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178778 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pettibonelisa understandingtheinterdisciplinaryandinstitutionaldiversityofcitizenscienceasurveyofcurrentpracticeingermanyandaustria AT vohlandkatrin understandingtheinterdisciplinaryandinstitutionaldiversityofcitizenscienceasurveyofcurrentpracticeingermanyandaustria AT zieglerdavid understandingtheinterdisciplinaryandinstitutionaldiversityofcitizenscienceasurveyofcurrentpracticeingermanyandaustria |