Cargando…
Comparison of duplex PCR and phenotypic analysis in differentiating Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans from oral samples
Candida dubliniensis shares a wide range of phenotypic characteristics with Candida albicans including a common trait called germ tube positivity. Hence, laboratory differentiation of these two species is cumbersome. Duplex PCR analyses for C. albicans and C. dubliniensis was performed directly on D...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0435-9 |
_version_ | 1783246433868054528 |
---|---|
author | Sampath, Asanga Weerasekera, Manjula Dilhari, Ayomi Gunasekara, Chinthika Bulugahapitiya, Uditha Fernando, Neluka Samaranayake, Lakshman |
author_facet | Sampath, Asanga Weerasekera, Manjula Dilhari, Ayomi Gunasekara, Chinthika Bulugahapitiya, Uditha Fernando, Neluka Samaranayake, Lakshman |
author_sort | Sampath, Asanga |
collection | PubMed |
description | Candida dubliniensis shares a wide range of phenotypic characteristics with Candida albicans including a common trait called germ tube positivity. Hence, laboratory differentiation of these two species is cumbersome. Duplex PCR analyses for C. albicans and C. dubliniensis was performed directly on DNA extracted from a total of 122 germ tube positive isolates derived from 100 concentrated oral rinse samples from a random cohort of diabetics attending a clinic in Sri Lanka. These results were confirmed by DNA sequencing of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA of the yeasts. Performance efficacy of duplex PCR was then compared with phenotypic identification using a standard battery of phenotypic tests. Of the 122 germ tube positive isolates three were identified by duplex PCR as C. dubliniensis and the remainder as C. albicans. On the contrary, when the standard phenotypic tests, sugar assimilation and chlamydospore formation, were used to differentiate the two species 13 germ tube positive isolates were erroneously identified as C. dubliniensis. Duplex PCR was found to be rapid, sensitive and more specific than phenotypic identification methods in discriminating C. dubliniensis from C. albicans. This is also the first report on the oral carriage of C. dubliniensis in a Sri Lankan population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5487313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54873132017-07-13 Comparison of duplex PCR and phenotypic analysis in differentiating Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans from oral samples Sampath, Asanga Weerasekera, Manjula Dilhari, Ayomi Gunasekara, Chinthika Bulugahapitiya, Uditha Fernando, Neluka Samaranayake, Lakshman AMB Express Original Article Candida dubliniensis shares a wide range of phenotypic characteristics with Candida albicans including a common trait called germ tube positivity. Hence, laboratory differentiation of these two species is cumbersome. Duplex PCR analyses for C. albicans and C. dubliniensis was performed directly on DNA extracted from a total of 122 germ tube positive isolates derived from 100 concentrated oral rinse samples from a random cohort of diabetics attending a clinic in Sri Lanka. These results were confirmed by DNA sequencing of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA of the yeasts. Performance efficacy of duplex PCR was then compared with phenotypic identification using a standard battery of phenotypic tests. Of the 122 germ tube positive isolates three were identified by duplex PCR as C. dubliniensis and the remainder as C. albicans. On the contrary, when the standard phenotypic tests, sugar assimilation and chlamydospore formation, were used to differentiate the two species 13 germ tube positive isolates were erroneously identified as C. dubliniensis. Duplex PCR was found to be rapid, sensitive and more specific than phenotypic identification methods in discriminating C. dubliniensis from C. albicans. This is also the first report on the oral carriage of C. dubliniensis in a Sri Lankan population. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5487313/ /pubmed/28658945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0435-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sampath, Asanga Weerasekera, Manjula Dilhari, Ayomi Gunasekara, Chinthika Bulugahapitiya, Uditha Fernando, Neluka Samaranayake, Lakshman Comparison of duplex PCR and phenotypic analysis in differentiating Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans from oral samples |
title | Comparison of duplex PCR and phenotypic analysis in differentiating Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans from oral samples |
title_full | Comparison of duplex PCR and phenotypic analysis in differentiating Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans from oral samples |
title_fullStr | Comparison of duplex PCR and phenotypic analysis in differentiating Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans from oral samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of duplex PCR and phenotypic analysis in differentiating Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans from oral samples |
title_short | Comparison of duplex PCR and phenotypic analysis in differentiating Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans from oral samples |
title_sort | comparison of duplex pcr and phenotypic analysis in differentiating candida dubliniensis from candida albicans from oral samples |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0435-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sampathasanga comparisonofduplexpcrandphenotypicanalysisindifferentiatingcandidadubliniensisfromcandidaalbicansfromoralsamples AT weerasekeramanjula comparisonofduplexpcrandphenotypicanalysisindifferentiatingcandidadubliniensisfromcandidaalbicansfromoralsamples AT dilhariayomi comparisonofduplexpcrandphenotypicanalysisindifferentiatingcandidadubliniensisfromcandidaalbicansfromoralsamples AT gunasekarachinthika comparisonofduplexpcrandphenotypicanalysisindifferentiatingcandidadubliniensisfromcandidaalbicansfromoralsamples AT bulugahapitiyauditha comparisonofduplexpcrandphenotypicanalysisindifferentiatingcandidadubliniensisfromcandidaalbicansfromoralsamples AT fernandoneluka comparisonofduplexpcrandphenotypicanalysisindifferentiatingcandidadubliniensisfromcandidaalbicansfromoralsamples AT samaranayakelakshman comparisonofduplexpcrandphenotypicanalysisindifferentiatingcandidadubliniensisfromcandidaalbicansfromoralsamples |