Cargando…
Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation
AIM: To assess the accuracy of serum procalcitionin (PCT) as a diagnostic marker in verifying upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation (GIP). METHODS: This retrospective study included 46 patients from the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical Uni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i24.4422 |
_version_ | 1783246477603110912 |
---|---|
author | Gao, Yang Yu, Kai-Jiang Kang, Kai Liu, Hai-Tao Zhang, Xing Huang, Rui Qu, Jing-Dong Wang, Si-Cong Liu, Rui-Jin Liu, Yan-Song Wang, Hong-Liang |
author_facet | Gao, Yang Yu, Kai-Jiang Kang, Kai Liu, Hai-Tao Zhang, Xing Huang, Rui Qu, Jing-Dong Wang, Si-Cong Liu, Rui-Jin Liu, Yan-Song Wang, Hong-Liang |
author_sort | Gao, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To assess the accuracy of serum procalcitionin (PCT) as a diagnostic marker in verifying upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation (GIP). METHODS: This retrospective study included 46 patients from the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University who were confirmed to have GIP between June 2013 and December 2016. Demographic and clinical patient data were recorded on admission to ICU. Patients were divided into upper (n = 19) and lower (n = 27) GIP groups according to the perforation site (above or below Treitz ligament). PCT and WBC count was obtained before laparotomy and then compared between groups. Meanwhile, the diagnostic accuracy of PCT was analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with lower GIP exhibited significantly higher APACHE II score, SOFA score and serum PCT level than patients with upper GIP (P = 0.017, 0.004, and 0.001, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation between serum PCT level and APACHE II score or SOFA score (r = 0.715 and r = 0.611, respectively), while there was a significant negative correlation between serum PCT level and prognosis (r = -0.414). WBC count was not significantly different between the two groups, and WBC count showed no significant correlation with serum PCT level, APACHE II score, SOFA score or prognosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of PCT level to distinguish upper or lower GIP was 0.778. Patients with a serum PCT level above 17.94 ng/dL had a high likelihood of lower GIP, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 42.1%. CONCLUSION: Serum PCT level is a reliable and accurate diagnostic marker in identifying upper or lower GIP before laparotomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5487506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54875062017-07-13 Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation Gao, Yang Yu, Kai-Jiang Kang, Kai Liu, Hai-Tao Zhang, Xing Huang, Rui Qu, Jing-Dong Wang, Si-Cong Liu, Rui-Jin Liu, Yan-Song Wang, Hong-Liang World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Study AIM: To assess the accuracy of serum procalcitionin (PCT) as a diagnostic marker in verifying upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation (GIP). METHODS: This retrospective study included 46 patients from the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University who were confirmed to have GIP between June 2013 and December 2016. Demographic and clinical patient data were recorded on admission to ICU. Patients were divided into upper (n = 19) and lower (n = 27) GIP groups according to the perforation site (above or below Treitz ligament). PCT and WBC count was obtained before laparotomy and then compared between groups. Meanwhile, the diagnostic accuracy of PCT was analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with lower GIP exhibited significantly higher APACHE II score, SOFA score and serum PCT level than patients with upper GIP (P = 0.017, 0.004, and 0.001, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation between serum PCT level and APACHE II score or SOFA score (r = 0.715 and r = 0.611, respectively), while there was a significant negative correlation between serum PCT level and prognosis (r = -0.414). WBC count was not significantly different between the two groups, and WBC count showed no significant correlation with serum PCT level, APACHE II score, SOFA score or prognosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of PCT level to distinguish upper or lower GIP was 0.778. Patients with a serum PCT level above 17.94 ng/dL had a high likelihood of lower GIP, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 42.1%. CONCLUSION: Serum PCT level is a reliable and accurate diagnostic marker in identifying upper or lower GIP before laparotomy. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-06-28 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5487506/ /pubmed/28706425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i24.4422 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Study Gao, Yang Yu, Kai-Jiang Kang, Kai Liu, Hai-Tao Zhang, Xing Huang, Rui Qu, Jing-Dong Wang, Si-Cong Liu, Rui-Jin Liu, Yan-Song Wang, Hong-Liang Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation |
title | Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation |
title_full | Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation |
title_fullStr | Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation |
title_full_unstemmed | Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation |
title_short | Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation |
title_sort | procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation |
topic | Retrospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i24.4422 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaoyang procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation AT yukaijiang procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation AT kangkai procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation AT liuhaitao procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation AT zhangxing procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation AT huangrui procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation AT qujingdong procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation AT wangsicong procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation AT liuruijin procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation AT liuyansong procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation AT wanghongliang procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation |