Cargando…

Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation

AIM: To assess the accuracy of serum procalcitionin (PCT) as a diagnostic marker in verifying upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation (GIP). METHODS: This retrospective study included 46 patients from the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical Uni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Yang, Yu, Kai-Jiang, Kang, Kai, Liu, Hai-Tao, Zhang, Xing, Huang, Rui, Qu, Jing-Dong, Wang, Si-Cong, Liu, Rui-Jin, Liu, Yan-Song, Wang, Hong-Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706425
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i24.4422
_version_ 1783246477603110912
author Gao, Yang
Yu, Kai-Jiang
Kang, Kai
Liu, Hai-Tao
Zhang, Xing
Huang, Rui
Qu, Jing-Dong
Wang, Si-Cong
Liu, Rui-Jin
Liu, Yan-Song
Wang, Hong-Liang
author_facet Gao, Yang
Yu, Kai-Jiang
Kang, Kai
Liu, Hai-Tao
Zhang, Xing
Huang, Rui
Qu, Jing-Dong
Wang, Si-Cong
Liu, Rui-Jin
Liu, Yan-Song
Wang, Hong-Liang
author_sort Gao, Yang
collection PubMed
description AIM: To assess the accuracy of serum procalcitionin (PCT) as a diagnostic marker in verifying upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation (GIP). METHODS: This retrospective study included 46 patients from the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University who were confirmed to have GIP between June 2013 and December 2016. Demographic and clinical patient data were recorded on admission to ICU. Patients were divided into upper (n = 19) and lower (n = 27) GIP groups according to the perforation site (above or below Treitz ligament). PCT and WBC count was obtained before laparotomy and then compared between groups. Meanwhile, the diagnostic accuracy of PCT was analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with lower GIP exhibited significantly higher APACHE II score, SOFA score and serum PCT level than patients with upper GIP (P = 0.017, 0.004, and 0.001, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation between serum PCT level and APACHE II score or SOFA score (r = 0.715 and r = 0.611, respectively), while there was a significant negative correlation between serum PCT level and prognosis (r = -0.414). WBC count was not significantly different between the two groups, and WBC count showed no significant correlation with serum PCT level, APACHE II score, SOFA score or prognosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of PCT level to distinguish upper or lower GIP was 0.778. Patients with a serum PCT level above 17.94 ng/dL had a high likelihood of lower GIP, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 42.1%. CONCLUSION: Serum PCT level is a reliable and accurate diagnostic marker in identifying upper or lower GIP before laparotomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5487506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54875062017-07-13 Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation Gao, Yang Yu, Kai-Jiang Kang, Kai Liu, Hai-Tao Zhang, Xing Huang, Rui Qu, Jing-Dong Wang, Si-Cong Liu, Rui-Jin Liu, Yan-Song Wang, Hong-Liang World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Study AIM: To assess the accuracy of serum procalcitionin (PCT) as a diagnostic marker in verifying upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation (GIP). METHODS: This retrospective study included 46 patients from the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University who were confirmed to have GIP between June 2013 and December 2016. Demographic and clinical patient data were recorded on admission to ICU. Patients were divided into upper (n = 19) and lower (n = 27) GIP groups according to the perforation site (above or below Treitz ligament). PCT and WBC count was obtained before laparotomy and then compared between groups. Meanwhile, the diagnostic accuracy of PCT was analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with lower GIP exhibited significantly higher APACHE II score, SOFA score and serum PCT level than patients with upper GIP (P = 0.017, 0.004, and 0.001, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation between serum PCT level and APACHE II score or SOFA score (r = 0.715 and r = 0.611, respectively), while there was a significant negative correlation between serum PCT level and prognosis (r = -0.414). WBC count was not significantly different between the two groups, and WBC count showed no significant correlation with serum PCT level, APACHE II score, SOFA score or prognosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of PCT level to distinguish upper or lower GIP was 0.778. Patients with a serum PCT level above 17.94 ng/dL had a high likelihood of lower GIP, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 42.1%. CONCLUSION: Serum PCT level is a reliable and accurate diagnostic marker in identifying upper or lower GIP before laparotomy. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-06-28 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5487506/ /pubmed/28706425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i24.4422 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Gao, Yang
Yu, Kai-Jiang
Kang, Kai
Liu, Hai-Tao
Zhang, Xing
Huang, Rui
Qu, Jing-Dong
Wang, Si-Cong
Liu, Rui-Jin
Liu, Yan-Song
Wang, Hong-Liang
Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation
title Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation
title_full Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation
title_fullStr Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation
title_full_unstemmed Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation
title_short Procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation
title_sort procalcitionin as a diagnostic marker to distinguish upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706425
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i24.4422
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoyang procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation
AT yukaijiang procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation
AT kangkai procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation
AT liuhaitao procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation
AT zhangxing procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation
AT huangrui procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation
AT qujingdong procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation
AT wangsicong procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation
AT liuruijin procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation
AT liuyansong procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation
AT wanghongliang procalcitioninasadiagnosticmarkertodistinguishupperandlowergastrointestinalperforation